Office for Environmental Programs - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 1 of 1
-
ItemA cautious approach to GMO regulation( 2013)The constant human population and events such as climate change hinder the achievement of global food security and threaten the effectiveness of current agricultural practices. To address this issues the need for technological intervention is necessary. That is the case of GM technology, which is being highly implemented around the globe to increase crops' yields, enhance nutrimental value in foods and feed, increase crops resistance to extreme conditions and pesticides among other activities. Nevertheless, the implementation of GMOs involves risks such as toxicity, the creation of super-weeds and genetic contamination. GMOs can bring multiple benefits and represent one of the most promising strategies to achieve global food security. In order to take advantage of such benefits and avoid the risks that GMOs involve they should be managed with precaution. It is through proper regulation that this cautious approach can be achieved. Examples of current regulations are evidence of the lack of precaution and the consequences of it. Such regulations include the Law on the Production, Certification and Commerce of Seeds, the Law on Plant Health and the General Law of Ecological Equilibrium. This Mexican frameworks stand out for its almost non existent precaution regarding the management of GMOs. Consequences of such thoughtless regulations can be summarised in the Mexican maize tragedy. An event triggered by the signature of the NAFTA treaty in 1994 that lead to economic crisis headed by the genetic contamination of GM maize imported from the United States, the country had poor and deceiving precautionary regulations. On the other hand, examples of highly strict regulations are evidence of how inflexibility can hinder the elution of technology. Such regulations includes the Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release of GMOs into the environment, the Regulation (EC) 258/97 on novel foods and food ingredients, the Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 on novel food and feed and the Regulation (EC) 1830/2003 on traceability and labelling of GMOs an GM products (Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release of GMOs [2001]). These regulations lead the EU approach to a state of 'suspended animation' regarding the advances in GM technology. The description of a 'proper GMO regulation' provided in the present document was obtained by analysing and comparing both approaches. Proper legislation can be defined as uncertainty-wise regulatory frameworks that implements the precautionary principle and risk assessment measures in a coherent-safe directed way, implements a cautious but flexible rigour and is highly specific. In the same way, a proper regulatory framework should also be shaped by safety-relevant stake holders, those advocating for the prevalence of biological diversity, environmental health, sustainability and hunger alleviation rather that those advocating for personal interests and the enrichment of a few. GMOs and such technology should serve not lucrative purposes but those of sustainability and famine alleviation. Under a proper regulatory framework as the one described above is how a cautious approach to GMO legislation can allow the exploitation of the GM benefits in order to increase the effectiveness of agricultural practices and achieve global food security in the light of major challenges such as climate change, the continuous grow of the human population as well as the exhaustion of natural resources whilst avoiding the risks that GM technology involves