Victorian College of the Arts

WHO’S AFRAID OF ABORIGINAL ART? investigated how intercultural curatorial models reframe and redefine narratives and understandings of Aboriginal art. Through a series of three original curated exhibition projects, this practice-led research expanded the framework through which the curation of Aboriginal art has historically been approached and/or confined. Each exhibition brought together diverse Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australian visual art practices to generate profound intercultural resonances. Furthermore, each curatorial model was informed by an Indigenous worldview that acknowledges the interconnection and interdependency of life, materiality, and place. Collectively, the exhibitions form the core creative outcomes of this practice-led research and comprise 'one (&) another' (2020–22), 'In and of this place' (2021–22), and 'breathing space' (2021–22). Each exhibition deployed a different intercultural curatorial model for the presentation of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australian art as a means of investigating how Aboriginal art is presented and how Aboriginal artists are represented in the broader context of Australian art. This was achieved through a visual and spatial levelling of artworld hierarchies (such as those that are identity-based, geographic, and/or medium-specific) that have historically informed the selection and display of Aboriginal art. For the purposes of this practice-led research, this exegesis presents each exhibition outcome within a respective chapter – “Chapter 1: one (&) another”, “Chapter 2: In and of this place”, and “Chapter 3: breathing space”. While the exegesis presents the exhibitions sequentially, they evolved concurrently. “Chapter 1: one (&) another” presents a dual-format exhibition featuring two distinct bodies of work: a collection of brightly coloured fibre baskets by Tjanpi Desert Weavers (Aboriginal) and a series of video works by Taree Mackenzie (non-Aboriginal). By bringing Tjanpi baskets together with Mackenzie’s video works, the exhibition interrupted artworld categories and binaries to emphasise the importance of opening up curatorial engagement with Aboriginal art that moves beyond the generalised identity-based tropes. “Chapter 2: In and of this place” is focused on an online collection-based exhibition that included a series of twelve “artwork pairings” that each comprised a historical landscape painting from the Benalla Art Gallery Collection (non-Aboriginal) and a work of art by a contemporary Aboriginal artist responding to Country in varying ways. This model disrupted the hierarchical power dynamics typical within collection-based exhibitions of Australian art. “Chapter 3: breathing space” examines a group-format exhibition that featured video, sculpture, text-based work, installation, and audio by four Aboriginal artists and two non-Aboriginal artists. The exhibition interrupted hierarchical curatorial notions of expertise by considering Australian contemporary art within an Indigenous knowledge framework that understands knowledge as collective as opposed to individualistic, and that operates across time and place. This practice-led research emerged from the curatorial hesitation that often exists between works of art by Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australian artists in exhibitions, particularly in the context of Australian art. Each exhibition disrupted standard institutional curatorial methods of approaching, viewing, and understanding Aboriginal art. Collectively, they engaged a broader conversation about the curatorship of Australian art. As a diplomatic action in alignment with Indigenous protocols, each chapter begins with a contextual discussion that provides a synthesis of a range of curatorial histories and exhibition precedents. These initial discussions frame an in-depth curatorial reflection on each intercultural curatorial model and exhibition outcome because it is important that the reader understand my practice in the context of a lineage of curatorship of Aboriginal art and Indigenous curation.

Modern Australian identity is impacted by historically romanticised images and narratives of the occident which in post-colonial Australia remain oddly familiar and unfamiliar at the same time. This research explores certain romanticised narratives as the question of their reliability becomes the catalyst for a collision between art, lived-experience, identity and representation. ‘Heidegger’s hesitations: Mise-en-scenes of unreliable narration’ examines this concern primarily through interrogating the effects of this collision. As a figure of substantial philosophical consequence whose ideas have significantly informed art theory, Heidegger and his Greek sojourn is pursued through the retracing as being experientially-unanalysed. If ‘retracing’ is the ‘way of the image’, what if anything, can be specifically recuperated from retracing philosopher Martin Heidegger’s 1962 sojourn across Greece that might inform art today? In the European Spring of 2017, the project of retracing followed Heidegger’s journey to Greece uncovering a series of points that provided the basis for a critique of his concept of aletheia. Tourism emerged as a practical method for exploring certain narratives. Metaphorically, tourism provided a useful image for the exploration of ideas. For the tourist, a dislocation occurs that characterises an un-belonging. It is this sense of un-belonging that is apparent in the many hesitations Heidegger recalls in his narrative account ‘Sojourns: The journey to Greece’. Both Heidegger’s sojourn and the retracing of it, are explored as mise en scenes of unreliable narration where the abjectness of each romanticisation is formed in the perceived authority of narrative imagery, asking why is it that certain narratives hold weight and are carried whilst others are jettisoned, dropped or simply forgotten?

Victorian College of the Arts - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

Filters

Date

Author

Subject

Type

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Statistics

Citations

Search Results