Obstetrics and Gynaecology - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemPriorities for alleviating menopausal symptoms after cancer(LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2023-02)OBJECTIVE: To determine treatment priorities in women cancer patients attending a dedicated Menopausal Symptoms After Cancer service. METHODS: Cancer type and stage were abstracted from medical records. Women ranked up to three symptoms as treatment priorities from the list "hot flushes/night sweats," "mood changes," "vaginal dryness or soreness," "sleep disturbances," "feeling tired or worn out (fatigue)," "sexual problems and/or pain with intercourse," "joint pain," and "something else" with free-text response. For each prioritized symptom, patients completed standardized patient-reported outcome measures to determine symptom severity and impact. RESULTS: Of 189 patients, most had breast cancer (48.7%, n = 92), followed by hematological (25.8%, n = 49), gynecological (18.0%, n = 34), or colorectal (2.6%, n = 5). The highest (first-ranked) treatment priority was vasomotor symptoms (33.9%, n = 64), followed by fatigue (18.0%, n = 34), vaginal dryness/soreness (9.5%, n = 18), and sexual problems/pain with intercourse (9.5%, n = 18). Symptoms most often selected in the top three ("prioritized") were fatigue (57.7%, n = 109), vasomotor symptoms (57.1%, n = 108), and sleep disturbance (49.2%, n = 93). In patients who prioritized vasomotor symptoms, medians on the "problem," "distress," and "interference" dimensions of the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale were, respectively, 6.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 5.0-8.0), 5.5 (IQR, 3.0-8.0), and 5.0 (IQR, 3.-7.0), indicating moderate severity. In patients who prioritized fatigue, the median Fatigue Scale score was 28 (IQR, 19-36), 37% worse than general population. CONCLUSIONS: Vasomotor symptoms, fatigue, sexual problems, and vaginal dryness/soreness were the leading priorities for treatment. Understanding symptom severity and patient priorities will inform better care for this growing population.
-
ItemHealth, social and economic implications of adolescent risk behaviours/states: protocol for Raine Study Gen2 cohort data linkage study(Bristol University Press, 2022)Background: Risk-taking behaviours are a major contributor to youth morbidity and mortality. Vulnerability to these negative outcomes is constructed from individual behaviour including risktaking, and from social context, ecological determinants, early life experience, developmental capacity and mental health, contributing to a state of higher risk. However, although risktaking is part of normal adolescent development, there is no systematic way to distinguish young people with a high probability of serious adverse outcomes, hindering the capacity to screen and intervene. This study aims to explore the association between risk behaviours/states in adolescence and negative health, social and economic outcomes through young adulthood. Methods: The Raine Study is a prospective cohort study which recruited pregnant women in 1989–91, in Perth, Western Australia. The offspring cohort (N = 2,868) was followed up at regular intervals from 1 to 27 years of age. These data will be linked to State government health and welfare administrative data.We will empirically examine relationships across multiple domains of risk (for example, substance use, sexual behaviour, driving) with health and social outcomes (for instance, roadcrash injury, educational underachievement). Microsimulation models will measure the impact of risk-taking on educational attainment and labour force outcomes. Discussion: Comprehensive preventive child health programmes and policy prioritise a healthy start to life. This is the first linkage study focusing on adolescence to adopt a multidomain approach, and to integrate health economic modelling. This approach captures a more complete picture of health and social impacts of risk behaviour/ states in adolescence and young adulthood.