General Practice and Primary Care - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemSupporting primary care practitioners to promote dementia risk reduction in Australian general practice: development and pilot evaluation of a practice change intervention and targeted implementation approach( 2023-10)Background. People in Australia have limited awareness of the potential for dementia risk reduction. General practice is an appropriate setting for promoting dementia risk reduction, yet it is not routinely discussed. The objectives of the Preventing Cognitive Impairment in Practice Project were to (1) develop an intervention for promoting dementia risk reduction in Australian general practice, (2) assess barriers to implementing the intervention, (3) develop an implementation approach in which strategies to mitigate assessed barriers were selected, operationalised, and introduced progressively, and (4) pilot the intervention and implementation approach in Australian general practices. Methods. The project was guided by a range of frameworks (eg, the Knowledge-to-Action Framework, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research). The project comprised six separate studies, including two scoping reviews, qualitative interviews with Australian primary care practitioners, retrospective analysis of discussion board posts from non-medically trained enrollees in a free online educational course about dementia risk reduction, development of an intervention and targeted implementation approach based on evidence and stakeholder consultation, and a pilot evaluation of implementation outcomes in five general practices in Melbourne, Australia. Results. The intervention comprised a patient survey to be completed in the waiting room and patient information cards to be used during consultations, both of which were designed to prompt specific practitioner actions. The implementation approach combined educational materials, outreach visits, local consensus discussions about whether dementia risk reduction was important and whether the proposed practice changes were appropriate, champions to drive implementation within general practices, and capturing and sharing knowledge across general practices. On piloting, implementation outcomes were mixed. Both the intervention and implementation approach were broadly acceptable and feasible, but penetration (‘reach’) was low. Discussion. The Preventing Cognitive Impairment in Practice Project led to an acceptable and feasible practice change intervention and targeted implementation approach that can support the promotion of dementia risk reduction in Australian general practices. Interpretation of the evaluation data identified opportunities for refinements to the intervention and implementation approach. Female participants and self-selected participants interested in DRR were overrepresented throughout the project. Future research could examine hypotheses about implementation outcomes arising from the pilot study, consider additional implementation outcomes, and adapt the intervention and targeted implementation approach for other contexts and populations.
-
ItemAssessing and addressing diabetes distress during type 2 diabetes care: Design and implementation of a digital health solution in general practice( 2023-04)Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects 1.2 million (4.5%) Australians. It is estimated that up to 36% of people with T2D experience diabetes distress, the negative emotional experience resulting from the challenges of living with the demands of diabetes. Diabetes distress impacts diabetes self management and glycaemia. Healthcare professionals can assess diabetes distress using the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) scale. Given that most people with T2D attend general practice, it is important to understand and optimise general practice approaches to assessing and addressing diabetes distress. Aim: This thesis aims to explore current practices for assessing and addressing diabetes distress in Australian general practice and develop an intervention to optimise these. Methods: Following a literature review, I conducted five related studies in two phases aligned with the Knowledge to Action framework. The first phase comprises three studies: a systematic review, interviews with people with T2D, and a survey of general practitioners (GPs). The first study was a systematic review of studies using a Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) to assess depressive symptoms or diabetes distress during T2D care. In study two, I explored people with T2D experiences of emotional support in general practice using qualitative interviews. In study three, an online survey of GPs, I explored the current practices for assessing diabetes distress. In phase two of the thesis, I addressed key gaps identified in phase one in a series of design sessions and a case study to design and implement a digital health solution, PROM-GP. Results: There was a paucity of studies exploring if using the PAID scale during T2D care was associated with improvements in clinical and process outcomes in general practice. People with T2D do not recall completing the PAID scale in consultations with their GP. However, they acknowledged that the GP-patient relationship supported emotional health discussions. People with T2D speculated that the PAID scale would support the discussion if this relationship were absent. Three-quarters of GPs recognise their role in diabetes distress assessment. However, only a quarter GPs routinely ask about or assess for diabetes distress, and only 1.9% use the PAID scale. Health professionals key design preference was supportive language to minimise patients’ negative emotional responses when completing the PAID scale. Implementing PROM-GP was part of an ongoing relationship, with practices inviting people with T2D whom they deemed suitable. COVID-19 impacted healthcare professionals’ capacity to engage with the implementation of PROM-GP. Conclusions: Despite most GPs recognising their role, few routinely ask about or assess diabetes distress. When general practice healthcare professionals use the PAID scale, it is with a limited subset of people with T2D with an existing relationship. This limits the PAID scale use with people without an existing relationship who want to be asked. Healthcare professionals are concerned that asking and completing the PAID scale will elicit a negative emotional, unlike people with T2D who view it as a questionnaire. Competing interests hindered sustained implementation. Future research can focus on systematically implementing the PAID scale with automation during all T2D annual reviews.