Centre for Youth Mental Health - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Associations of depression and regional brain structure across the adult lifespan: Pooled analyses of six population-based and two clinical cohort studies in the European Lifebrain consortium
    Binnewies, J ; Nawijn, L ; Brandmaier, AM ; Baare, WFC ; Bartres-Faz, D ; Drevon, CA ; Duezel, S ; Fjell, AM ; Han, LKM ; Knights, E ; Lindenberger, U ; Milaneschi, Y ; Mowinckel, AM ; Nyberg, L ; Plachti, A ; Madsen, KS ; Sole-Padulles, C ; Suri, S ; Walhovd, KB ; Zsoldos, E ; Ebmeier, KP ; Penninx, BWJH (ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2022)
    OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder has been associated with lower prefrontal thickness and hippocampal volume, but it is unknown whether this association also holds for depressive symptoms in the general population. We investigated associations of depressive symptoms and depression status with brain structures across population-based and patient-control cohorts, and explored whether these associations are similar over the lifespan and across sexes. METHODS: We included 3,447 participants aged 18-89 years from six population-based and two clinical patient-control cohorts of the European Lifebrain consortium. Cross-sectional meta-analyses using individual person data were performed for associations of depressive symptoms and depression status with FreeSurfer-derived thickness of bilateral rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) and medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), and hippocampal and total grey matter volume (GMV), separately for population-based and clinical cohorts. RESULTS: Across patient-control cohorts, depressive symptoms and presence of mild-to-severe depression were associated with lower mOFC thickness (rsymptoms = -0.15/ rstatus = -0.22), rACC thickness (rsymptoms = -0.20/ rstatus = -0.25), hippocampal volume (rsymptoms = -0.13/ rstatus = 0.13) and total GMV (rsymptoms = -0.21/ rstatus = -0.25). Effect sizes were slightly larger for presence of moderate-to-severe depression. Associations were similar across age groups and sex. Across population-based cohorts, no associations between depression and brain structures were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Fitting with previous meta-analyses, depressive symptoms and depression status were associated with lower mOFC, rACC thickness, and hippocampal and total grey matter volume in clinical patient-control cohorts, although effect sizes were small. The absence of consistent associations in population-based cohorts with mostly mild depressive symptoms, suggests that significantly lower thickness and volume of the studied brain structures are only detectable in clinical populations with more severe depressive symptoms.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The association between clinical and biological characteristics of depression and structural brain alterations
    Toenders, YJ ; Schmaal, L ; Nawijn, L ; Han, LKM ; Binnewies, J ; van der Wee, NJA ; van Tol, M-J ; Veltman, DJ ; Milaneschi, Y ; Lamers, F ; Penninx, BWJH (ELSEVIER, 2022-09-01)
    BACKGROUND: Structural brain alterations are observed in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, MDD is a highly heterogeneous disorder and specific clinical or biological characteristics of depression might relate to specific structural brain alterations. Clinical symptom subtypes of depression, as well as immuno-metabolic dysregulation associated with subtypes of depression, have been associated with brain alterations. Therefore, we examined if specific clinical and biological characteristics of depression show different brain alterations compared to overall depression. METHOD: Individuals with and without depressive and/or anxiety disorders from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) (328 participants from three timepoints leading to 541 observations) and the Mood Treatment with Antidepressants or Running (MOTAR) study (123 baseline participants) were included. Symptom profiles (atypical energy-related profile, melancholic profile and depression severity) and biological indices (inflammatory, metabolic syndrome, and immuno-metabolic indices) were created. The associations of the clinical and biological profiles with depression-related structural brain measures (anterior cingulate cortex [ACC], orbitofrontal cortex, insula, and nucleus accumbens) were examined dimensionally in both studies and meta-analysed. RESULTS: Depression severity was negatively associated with rostral ACC thickness (B = -0.55, pFDR = 0.03), and melancholic symptoms were negatively associated with caudal ACC thickness (B = -0.42, pFDR = 0.03). The atypical energy-related symptom profile and immuno-metabolic indices did not show a consistent association with structural brain measures across studies. CONCLUSION: Overall depression- and melancholic symptom severity showed a dose-response relationship with reduced ACC thickness. No associations between immuno-metabolic dysregulation and structural brain alterations were found, suggesting that although both are associated with depression, distinct mechanisms may be involved.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A large-scale ENIGMA multisite replication study of brain age in depression
    Han, LKM ; Dinga, R ; Leenings, R ; Hahn, T ; Cole, JH ; Aftanas, LI ; Amod, AR ; Besteher, B ; Colle, R ; Corruble, E ; Couvy-Duchesne, B ; Danilenko, KV ; Fuentes-Claramonte, P ; Gonul, AS ; Gotlib, IH ; Goya-Maldonado, R ; Groenewold, NA ; Hamilton, P ; Ichikawa, N ; Ipser, JC ; Itai, E ; Koopowitz, S-M ; Li, M ; Okada, G ; Okamoto, Y ; Churikova, OS ; Osipov, EA ; Penninx, BWJH ; Pomarol-Clotet, E ; Rodríguez-Cano, E ; Sacchet, MD ; Shinzato, H ; Sim, K ; Stein, DJ ; Uyar-Demir, A ; Veltman, DJ ; Schmaal, L (Elsevier BV, 2022-12)
    Background: Several studies have evaluated whether depressed persons have older appearing brains than their nondepressed peers. However, the estimated neuroimaging-derived “brain age gap” has varied from study to study, likely driven by differences in training and testing sample (size), age range, and used modality/features. To validate our previously developed ENIGMA brain age model and the identified brain age gap, we aim to replicate the presence and effect size estimate previously found in the largest study in depression to date (N = 2126 controls & N = 2675 cases; +1.08 years [SE 0.22], Cohen’s d = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.08–0.20), in independent cohorts that were not part of the original study. Methods: A previously trained brain age model (www.photon-ai.com/enigma_brainage) based on 77 FreeSurfer brain regions of interest was used to obtain unbiased brain age predictions in 751 controls and 766 persons with depression (18–75 years) from 13 new cohorts collected from 20 different scanners. Meta-regressions were used to examine potential moderating effects of basic cohort characteristics (e.g., clinical and scan technical) on the brain age gap. Results: Our ENIGMA MDD brain age model generalized reasonably well to controls from the new cohorts (predicted age vs. age: r = 0.73, R2 = 0.47, MAE = 7.50 years), although the performance varied from cohort to cohort. In these new cohorts, on average, depressed persons showed a significantly higher brain age gap of +1 year (SE 0.35) (Cohen’s d = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05–0.25) compared with controls, highly similar to our previous finding. Significant moderating effects of FreeSurfer version 6.0 (d = 0.41, p = 0.007) and Philips scanner vendor (d = 0.50, p < 0.0001) were found, leading to more positive effect size estimates. Conclusions: This study further validates our previously developed ENIGMA brain age algorithm. Importantly, we replicated the brain age gap in depression with a comparable effect size. Thus, two large-scale independent mega-analyses across in total 32 cohorts and >3400 patients and >2800 controls worldwide show reliable but subtle effects of brain aging in adult depression. Future studies are needed to identify factors that may further explain the brain age gap variance between cohorts.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    eLife's new model and its impact on science communication
    Urban, L ; De Niz, M ; Fernandez-Chiappe, F ; Ebrahimi, H ; Han, LKM ; Mehta, D ; Mencia, R ; Mittal, D ; Ochola, E ; Quezada, C ; Romani, F ; Sinapayen, L ; Tay, A ; Varma, A ; Elkheir, LYM (eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD, 2022-12-08)
    The eLife Early-Career Advisory Group discusses eLife's new peer review and publishing model, and how the whole process of scientific communication could be improved for the benefit of early-career researchers and the entire scientific community.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Assessment of brain age in posttraumatic stress disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA PTSD and brain age working groups
    Clausen, AN ; Fercho, KA ; Monsour, M ; Disner, S ; Salminen, L ; Haswell, CC ; Rubright, EC ; Watts, AA ; Buckley, MN ; Maron-Katz, A ; Sierk, A ; Manthey, A ; Suarez-Jimenez, B ; Olatunji, BO ; Averill, CL ; Hofmann, D ; Veltman, DJ ; Olson, EA ; Li, G ; Forster, GL ; Walter, H ; Fitzgerald, J ; Theberge, J ; Simons, JS ; Bomyea, JA ; Frijling, JL ; Krystal, JH ; Baker, JT ; Phan, KL ; Ressler, K ; Han, LKM ; Nawijn, L ; Lebois, LAM ; Schmaall, L ; Densmore, M ; Shenton, ME ; van Zuiden, M ; Stein, M ; Fani, N ; Simons, RM ; Neufeld, RWJ ; Lanius, R ; van Rooij, S ; Koch, SBJ ; Bonomo, S ; Jovanovic, T ; DeRoon-Cassini, T ; Ely, TD ; Magnotta, VA ; He, X ; Abdallah, CG ; Etkin, A ; Schmahl, C ; Larson, C ; Rosso, IM ; Blackford, JU ; Stevens, JS ; Daniels, JK ; Herzog, J ; Kaufman, ML ; Olff, M ; Davidson, RJ ; Sponheim, SR ; Mueller, SC ; Straube, T ; Zhu, X ; Neria, Y ; Baugh, LA ; Cole, JH ; Thompson, PM ; Morey, RA (WILEY, 2022-01)
    BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with markers of accelerated aging. Estimates of brain age, compared to chronological age, may clarify the effects of PTSD on the brain and may inform treatment approaches targeting the neurobiology of aging in the context of PTSD. METHOD: Adult subjects (N = 2229; 56.2% male) aged 18-69 years (mean = 35.6, SD = 11.0) from 21 ENIGMA-PGC PTSD sites underwent T1-weighted brain structural magnetic resonance imaging, and PTSD assessment (PTSD+, n = 884). Previously trained voxel-wise (brainageR) and region-of-interest (BARACUS and PHOTON) machine learning pipelines were compared in a subset of control subjects (n = 386). Linear mixed effects models were conducted in the full sample (those with and without PTSD) to examine the effect of PTSD on brain predicted age difference (brain PAD; brain age - chronological age) controlling for chronological age, sex, and scan site. RESULTS: BrainageR most accurately predicted brain age in a subset (n = 386) of controls (brainageR: ICC = 0.71, R = 0.72, MAE = 5.68; PHOTON: ICC = 0.61, R = 0.62, MAE = 6.37; BARACUS: ICC = 0.47, R = 0.64, MAE = 8.80). Using brainageR, a three-way interaction revealed that young males with PTSD exhibited higher brain PAD relative to male controls in young and old age groups; old males with PTSD exhibited lower brain PAD compared to male controls of all ages. DISCUSSION: Differential impact of PTSD on brain PAD in younger versus older males may indicate a critical window when PTSD impacts brain aging, followed by age-related brain changes that are consonant with individuals without PTSD. Future longitudinal research is warranted to understand how PTSD impacts brain aging across the lifespan.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Mind the gap: Performance metric evaluation in brain-age prediction
    de Lange, A-MG ; Anaturk, M ; Rokicki, J ; Han, LKM ; Franke, K ; Alnaes, D ; Ebmeier, KP ; Draganski, B ; Kaufmann, T ; Westlye, LT ; Hahn, T ; Cole, JH (WILEY, 2022-07)
    Estimating age based on neuroimaging-derived data has become a popular approach to developing markers for brain integrity and health. While a variety of machine-learning algorithms can provide accurate predictions of age based on brain characteristics, there is significant variation in model accuracy reported across studies. We predicted age in two population-based datasets, and assessed the effects of age range, sample size and age-bias correction on the model performance metrics Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), the coefficient of determination (R2 ), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The results showed that these metrics vary considerably depending on cohort age range; r and R2 values are lower when measured in samples with a narrower age range. RMSE and MAE are also lower in samples with a narrower age range due to smaller errors/brain age delta values when predictions are closer to the mean age of the group. Across subsets with different age ranges, performance metrics improve with increasing sample size. Performance metrics further vary depending on prediction variance as well as mean age difference between training and test sets, and age-bias corrected metrics indicate high accuracy-also for models showing poor initial performance. In conclusion, performance metrics used for evaluating age prediction models depend on cohort and study-specific data characteristics, and cannot be directly compared across different studies. Since age-bias corrected metrics generally indicate high accuracy, even for poorly performing models, inspection of uncorrected model results provides important information about underlying model attributes such as prediction variance.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Genetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan
    Brouwer, RM ; Klein, M ; Grasby, KL ; Schnack, HG ; Jahanshad, N ; Teeuw, J ; Thomopoulos, SI ; Sprooten, E ; Franz, CE ; Gogtay, N ; Kremen, WS ; Panizzon, MS ; Olde Loohuis, LM ; Whelan, CD ; Aghajani, M ; Alloza, C ; Alanaes, D ; Artiges, E ; Ayesa-Arriola, R ; Barker, GJ ; Bastin, ME ; Blok, E ; Boen, E ; Breukelaar, IA ; Bright, JK ; Buimer, EEL ; Bulow, R ; Cannon, DM ; Ciufolini, S ; Crossley, NA ; Damatac, CG ; Dazzan, P ; de Mol, CL ; de Zwarte, SMC ; Desrivieres, S ; Diaz-Caneja, CM ; Doan, NT ; Dohm, K ; Froehner, JH ; Goltermann, J ; Grigis, A ; Grotegerd, D ; Han, LKM ; Harris, MA ; Hartman, CA ; Heany, SJ ; Heindel, W ; Heslenfeld, DJ ; Hohmann, S ; Ittermann, B ; Jansen, PR ; Janssen, J ; Jia, T ; Jiang, J ; Jockwitz, C ; Karali, T ; Keeser, D ; Koevoets, MGJC ; Lenroot, RK ; Malchow, B ; Mandl, RCW ; Medel, V ; Meinert, S ; Morgan, CA ; Muehleisen, TW ; Nabulsi, L ; Opel, N ; de la Foz, VO-G ; Overs, BJ ; Paillere Martinot, M-L ; Redlich, R ; Marques, TR ; Repple, J ; Roberts, G ; Roshchupkin, GV ; Setiaman, N ; Shumskaya, E ; Stein, F ; Sudre, G ; Takahashi, S ; Thalamuthu, A ; Tordesillas-Gutierrez, D ; van der Lugt, A ; van Haren, NEM ; Wardlaw, JM ; Wen, W ; Westeneng, H-J ; Wittfeld, K ; Zhu, AH ; Zugman, A ; Armstrong, NJ ; Bonfiglio, G ; Bralten, J ; Dalvie, S ; Davies, G ; Di Forti, M ; Ding, L ; Donohoe, G ; Forstner, AJ ; Gonzalez-Penas, J ; Guimaraes, JPOFT ; Homuth, G ; Hottenga, J-J ; Knol, MJ ; Kwok, JBJ ; Le Hellard, S ; Mather, KA ; Milaneschi, Y ; Morris, DW ; Noethen, MM ; Papiol, S ; Rietschel, M ; Santoro, ML ; Steen, VM ; Stein, JL ; Streit, F ; Tankard, RM ; Teumer, A ; van 't Ent, D ; van der Meer, D ; van Eijk, KR ; Vassos, E ; Vazquez-Bourgon, J ; Witt, SH ; Adams, HHH ; Agartz, I ; Ames, D ; Amunts, K ; Andreassen, OA ; Arango, C ; Banaschewski, T ; Baune, BT ; Belangero, SI ; Bokde, ALW ; Boomsma, DI ; Bressan, RA ; Brodaty, H ; Buitelaar, JK ; Cahn, W ; Caspers, S ; Cichon, S ; Crespo-Facorro, B ; Cox, SR ; Dannlowski, U ; Elvsashagen, T ; Espeseth, T ; Falkai, PG ; Fisher, SE ; Flor, H ; Fullerton, JM ; Garavan, H ; Gowland, PA ; Grabe, HJ ; Hahn, T ; Heinz, A ; Hillegers, M ; Hoare, J ; Hoekstra, PJ ; Ikram, MA ; Jackowski, AP ; Jansen, A ; Jonsson, EG ; Kahn, RS ; Kircher, T ; Korgaonkar, MS ; Krug, A ; Lemaitre, H ; Malt, UF ; Martinot, J-L ; McDonald, C ; Mitchell, PB ; Muetzel, RL ; Murray, RM ; Nees, F ; Nenadic, I ; Oosterlaan, J ; Ophoff, RA ; Pan, PM ; Penninx, BWJH ; Poustka, L ; Sachdev, PS ; Salum, GA ; Schofield, PR ; Schumann, G ; Shaw, P ; Sim, K ; Smolka, MN ; Stein, DJ ; Trollor, JN ; van den Berg, LH ; Veldink, JH ; Walter, H ; Westlye, LT ; Whelan, R ; White, T ; Wright, MJ ; Medland, SE ; Franke, B ; Thompson, PM ; Hulshoff Pol, HE (NATURE PORTFOLIO, 2022-04)
    Human brain structure changes throughout the lifespan. Altered brain growth or rates of decline are implicated in a vast range of psychiatric, developmental and neurodegenerative diseases. In this study, we identified common genetic variants that affect rates of brain growth or atrophy in what is, to our knowledge, the first genome-wide association meta-analysis of changes in brain morphology across the lifespan. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging data from 15,640 individuals were used to compute rates of change for 15 brain structures. The most robustly identified genes GPR139, DACH1 and APOE are associated with metabolic processes. We demonstrate global genetic overlap with depression, schizophrenia, cognitive functioning, insomnia, height, body mass index and smoking. Gene set findings implicate both early brain development and neurodegenerative processes in the rates of brain changes. Identifying variants involved in structural brain changes may help to determine biological pathways underlying optimal and dysfunctional brain development and aging.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Charting brain growth and aging at high spatial precision
    Rutherford, S ; Fraza, C ; Dinga, R ; Kia, SM ; Wolfers, T ; Zabihi, M ; Berthet, P ; Worker, A ; Verdi, S ; Andrews, D ; Han, LK ; Bayer, JM ; Dazzan, P ; McGuire, P ; Mocking, RT ; Schene, A ; Sripada, C ; Tso, IF ; Duval, ER ; Chang, S-E ; Penninx, BW ; Heitzeg, MM ; Burt, SA ; Hyde, LW ; Amaral, D ; Nordahl, CW ; Andreasssen, OA ; Westlye, LT ; Zahn, R ; Ruhe, HG ; Beckmann, C ; Marquand, AF (eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD, 2022-02-01)
    Defining reference models for population variation, and the ability to study individual deviations is essential for understanding inter-individual variability and its relation to the onset and progression of medical conditions. In this work, we assembled a reference cohort of neuroimaging data from 82 sites (N=58,836; ages 2-100) and used normative modeling to characterize lifespan trajectories of cortical thickness and subcortical volume. Models are validated against a manually quality checked subset (N=24,354) and we provide an interface for transferring to new data sources. We showcase the clinical value by applying the models to a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample (N=1985), showing they can be used to quantify variability underlying multiple disorders whilst also refining case-control inferences. These models will be augmented with additional samples and imaging modalities as they become available. This provides a common reference platform to bind results from different studies and ultimately paves the way for personalized clinical decision-making.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    FreeSurfer-based segmentation of hippocampal subfields: A review of methods and applications, with a novel quality control procedure for ENIGMA studies and other collaborative efforts
    Samann, PG ; Iglesias, JE ; Gutman, B ; Grotegerd, D ; Leenings, R ; Flint, C ; Dannlowski, U ; Clarke-Rubright, EK ; Morey, RA ; van Erp, TGM ; Whelan, CD ; Han, LKM ; van Velzen, LS ; Cao, B ; Augustinack, JC ; Thompson, PM ; Jahanshad, N ; Schmaal, L (WILEY, 2022-01)
    Structural hippocampal abnormalities are common in many neurological and psychiatric disorders, and variation in hippocampal measures is related to cognitive performance and other complex phenotypes such as stress sensitivity. Hippocampal subregions are increasingly studied, as automated algorithms have become available for mapping and volume quantification. In the context of the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta Analysis Consortium, several Disease Working Groups are using the FreeSurfer software to analyze hippocampal subregion (subfield) volumes in patients with neurological and psychiatric conditions along with data from matched controls. In this overview, we explain the algorithm's principles, summarize measurement reliability studies, and demonstrate two additional aspects (subfield autocorrelation and volume/reliability correlation) with illustrative data. We then explain the rationale for a standardized hippocampal subfield segmentation quality control (QC) procedure for improved pipeline harmonization. To guide researchers to make optimal use of the algorithm, we discuss how global size and age effects can be modeled, how QC steps can be incorporated and how subfields may be aggregated into composite volumes. This discussion is based on a synopsis of 162 published neuroimaging studies (01/2013-12/2019) that applied the FreeSurfer hippocampal subfield segmentation in a broad range of domains including cognition and healthy aging, brain development and neurodegeneration, affective disorders, psychosis, stress regulation, neurotoxicity, epilepsy, inflammatory disease, childhood adversity and posttraumatic stress disorder, and candidate and whole genome (epi-)genetics. Finally, we highlight points where FreeSurfer-based hippocampal subfield studies may be optimized.