Centre for Youth Mental Health - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4
-
ItemDoes co-occurring borderline personality disorder influence acute phase treatment for first-episode psychosis?(WILEY, 2018-12)BACKGROUND: This aims of this study were: (1) to determine the prevalence of co-occurring borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a first-episode psychosis (FEP) sample; (2) to determine differences between patients with and without BPD on demographics, comorbidities and clinical risks and other variables; and (3) to examine whether BPD comorbidity influenced treatment received by patients for FEP during their first 3 months after service entry to a specialist early psychosis service. METHODS: A file audit was conducted for 100 consecutive admissions to an early psychosis service. Patients with a clinician-rated co-occurring diagnosis of BPD were compared with patients without clinician-rated BPD on a range of variables. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of the FEP sample was diagnosed with co-occurring BPD by clinician ratings. The FEP group with co-occurring BPD was found to be younger, more likely to have other comorbidities, and were at higher risk of suicide and violent behaviour. Group differences were found in treatment received for FEP, whereby patients with co-occurring BPD had poorer access to standard treatment, including guideline concordant antipsychotic medication prescription. CONCLUSION: Young people with co-occurring clinician-rated BPD and FEP experienced greater difficulty accessing standard care for FEP and received relatively different treatment, including different pharmacotherapy, compared with those FEP patients without BPD. There is a need to develop new clinical guidelines and effective treatments for this specific subgroup with early psychosis and co-occurring BPD that take into account interpersonal and "premorbid" aspects of their presenting problems.
-
ItemA Comparison of Vocational Engagement Among Young People with Psychosis, Depression and Borderline Personality Pathology(SPRINGER, 2018-08)Poor vocational engagement is well documented among young people experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP). The aim of the present study was to establish and compare rates of vocational engagement across young people with first-episode psychosis, depression, and borderline personality pathology. A file audit was used to collect vocational data of young people aged 15-25 entering tertiary mental health treatment in 2011. Rates of vocational engagement were similar across groups, indicating that like those with FEP, young people with depression and borderline personality pathology experience impaired vocational engagement and are in need of targeted vocational interventions. Post hoc analysis indicated that that the depression group had significantly more people who were partially vocationally engaged compared with the psychosis group, suggesting that vocational interventions might need to be targeted differently across different diagnostic groups. Future research should explore risk factors for vocational disengagement across diagnostic groups in order to inform intervention development.
-
ItemA psychoeducational group intervention for family and friends of youth with borderline personality disorder features: protocol for a randomised controlled trial(BMC, 2018-07-25)BACKGROUND: Caring for a person with borderline personality disorder is associated with poor outcomes including elevated psychological distress and burden. This study will compare the effectiveness of two brief psychoeducational programs for carers of youth presenting for early intervention for borderline personality disorder features. The protocol for this study is presented here. METHODS: The study is a single-centre parallel group, randomised controlled trial. As a family unit, relatives, partners and friends ('carers') are randomly allocated to one of two treatment arms to receive either an online borderline personality disorder psychoeducation program, or both the online psychoeducation group and a face-to-face group program, Making Sense of Borderline Personality Disorder. Carers are assessed at baseline and follow-up (4 weeks after the intervention). It is expected that participants who received the combined group and online programs will have better outcomes than those who received the online program alone. The primary outcome is carer burden, assessed using the negative appraisal subscales of the Experience of Caregiving Inventory. Secondary outcomes include positive experiences of caregiving, coping, self-rated personality disorder knowledge, psychological distress, expressed emotion and quality of life. DISCUSSION: This will be the first published evaluation of a psychoeducational intervention for carers of youth with borderline personality disorder features using a randomised controlled trial design. The results have the potential to inform clinicians and carers about the effectiveness of brief interventions designed to support families and friends of young people with borderline personality disorder, and what medium those interventions should utilise. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12616000304437 on 08 March 2016.
-
ItemYouth Depression Alleviation-Augmentation with an anti-inflammatory agent (YoDA-A): protocol and rationale for a placebo-controlled randomized trial of rosuvastatin and aspirin(WILEY, 2018-02)AIM: There is growing support for the role of inflammation and oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). This has led to the development of novel strategies targeting inflammation in the treatment of depression. Rosuvastatin and aspirin have well-documented, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. The aim of the Youth Depression Alleviation: Augmentation with an anti-inflammatory agent (YoDA-A) study is to determine whether individuals receiving adjunctive anti-inflammatory agents, aspirin and rosuvastatin experience a reduction in the severity of MDD compared with individuals receiving placebo. METHODS: YoDA-A is a 12-week triple-blind, randomized controlled trial funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. Participants aged 15-25, with moderate-to-severe MDD, are allocated to receive either 10 mg/day rosuvastatin, 100 mg/day aspirin, or placebo, in addition to treatment as usual. Participants are assessed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 26. The primary outcome is change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from baseline to week 12. RESULTS: The study is planned to be completed in 2017. At date of publication, 85 participants have been recruited. CONCLUSION: Timely and targeted intervention for youth MDD is crucial. Given the paucity of new agents to treat youth MDD, adjunctive trials are not only pragmatic and 'real-world', but additionally aim to target shortfalls in conventional medications. This study has the potential to first provide two new adjunctive treatment options for youth MDD; aspirin and rosuvastatin. Second, this study will serve as proof of principle of the role of inflammation in MDD.