Centre for Youth Mental Health - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Brain Aging in Major Depressive Disorder: Results From the ENIGMA MDD Consortium
    Schmaal, L ; Han, L ; Dinga, R ; Thompson, P ; Veltman, D ; Penninx, B (ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2018-05-01)
    Background: Major Depressive Disorder has been associated with accelerated biological aging. From a brain perspective, normal aging is associated with significant loss of grey matter and depression may have an accelerating effect on age-related brain atrophy. Here, data on brain aging in MDD from the ENIGMA MDD Working Group will be presented. Methods: A normative model of brain-based age was devel- oped in 4708 healthy controls by applying a Gaussian Process Regression analysis with 10-fold cross-validation to estimate chronological age from structural MRI scans, separately for males and females. This model was then applied to 2924 MDD individuals to predict their brain-based age. Accelerated brain aging was measured as the difference between predicted brain-based age and actual chronological age (brain age gap). Results: The brain age model explained 92% and 93% of the age variance in female and male healthy controls, respectively. The mean absolute error (MAE) was 6.79 years in females and 6.60 in males. Application of the model to MDD patients showed a mean brain age gap of 0.75 years in females (MAE¼6.82) and 0.64 in males (MAE¼6.68), which were significantly lower than brain age gap estimates in healthy controls in both females (F(1,4379)¼6.10,P¼0.01) and males (F(1,3166)¼4.07,P¼0.04). Our preliminary analysis also showed greater brain age gap associations with various clinical characteristics. Conclusions: We found preliminary evidence for accelerated brain aging in MDD, however, the brains of patients were estimated to be only <1 years older than healthy controls. The impact of different methods, feature selection and potential confounding effects will also be discussed.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Deviations From Normative Age-Brain Associations in Over 3,000 Individuals With Major Depressive Disorder
    Schmaal, L ; Han, L ; Bayer, J ; Marquand, A ; Dinga, R ; Cole, J ; Hahn, T ; Penninx, B ; Veltman, D ; Thompson, P (ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2019-05-15)
    Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex heterogeneous disorder. Identifying brain alterations as indi- vidual deviations from normative patterns of brain-age asso- ciations, instead of patient group mean differences, can provide important insights into heterogeneous patterns of brain abnormalities observed in MDD. Methods: We estimated normative models of (1) age pre- dicting individual structural brain measures, and (2) structural brain measures predicting age (Brain Age model) using ma- chine learning in healthy individuals (N¼2,515) from the ENIGMA MDD consortium. We applied model parameters to independent samples of healthy individuals (N¼2,513) and MDD patients (N¼3,433) to obtain predicted values of brain structure (model 1) and age (model 2). Z-scores quantifying differences between predictive and true values were calcu- lated, representing individual deviations from the normative range. Results: The estimated normative models showed good model fit in the training sample; e.g. a correlation of R¼0.86 between actual and predicted age for the Brain Age Model, and good generalization to independent healthy and MDD samples. We identified heterogeneous patterns of brain deviations in MDD patients (model 1). Patients with more extreme deviations showed different clinical characteristics compared to patients residing within the normative range. Additionally, patients were estimated on average w1 year older than controls (model 2), but we also observed large between-person variation in brain age gaps. Further ana- lyses showed associations between brain age gap and clinical symptoms. Conclusions: Our work shows substantial heterogeneity in deviations from normal age-related variation in brain structure in individuals with MDD. The impact of and solutions for con- founding effects of scan site will also be discussed.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Meta-Analysis of Hippocampal Subfields: Results From the ENIGMA-MDD Working Group
    Saemann, P ; Czisch, M ; Jahanshad, N ; Whelan, CD ; van Velzen, L ; Hibar, D ; Han, L ; Veer, IM ; Walter, H ; Veltman, D ; Schmaal, L (ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2019-05-15)
    Background Hippocampal volume reductions in major depressive disorder (MDD) represent a robust finding in retrospective meta-analyses. Subregional specificity of this finding has been suspected from several smaller previous studies. Given the complex role of the hippocampus both for stress response regulation and its vulnerability to chronic disease, we aim at finer mapping of this result using FreeSurfer based, automated subfield segmentation. Methods Twenty-three centers with MDD/control samples contributed. Results reported here stem from 2522 patients and 4244 controls. After segmentation and standardized QC, local statistical were run for 25 models in total. Key models were: Cases vs. controls (covarying for age, age squared, sex-by-age, sex-by-age-squared, ICV and scanner/site); recurrent vs. controls, first episode vs. controls, early onset (EO, <22 years) vs. controls, late onset (LO) vs. controls. Eventually, inverse variance-weighted random-effect meta-analysis model in R (metafor package) with FDR correction for 14 phenotypes was performed. Results Regional specificity of volume deficits were detected in MDD as a whole (2522 patients, 4244 controls) (CA3>whole>CA1>GC.ML.DG>CA4>molecular layer). No robust effects were found in first episode patients (743 patients, 3812 controls) except for nominal effects. In recurrent MDD, only CA1 effects were robust. EO depression showed unexpectedly strong effects (836 patients, 3472 controls). Similarly, patients with current AD treatment showed strong effects, similarly distributed as in MDD except for CA1. No correlation with depression severity was detected. Conclusions Hippocampal structural changes in MDD show subregion specificity. While first episode status seems less critical and first/recurrent episode patients are similar, early onset appears as key predictor of structural abnormalities.