- Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research - Research Publications
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
2 results
Filters
Reset filtersSettings
Statistics
Citations
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemWorking Time Mismatch and Subjective Well-beingWooden, M ; Warren, D ; Drago, R (WILEY, 2009-03)Abstract This study uses nationally representative panel survey data for Australia to identify the role played by mismatches between hours actually worked and working time preferences in contributing to reported levels of job and life satisfaction. Three main conclusions emerge. First, it is not the number of hours worked that matters for subjective well‐being, but working time mismatch. Second, overemployment is a more serious problem than is underemployment. Third, while the magnitude of the impact of overemployment may seem small in absolute terms, relative to other variables, such as disability, the effect is quite large.
-
ItemPaid Annua Leave and Working Hours: Evidence from the HILDA SurveyWooden, M ; Warren, D (SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2008-09)Using data from wave 5 of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, this study examines: (1) the extent to which Australian employees use their annual leave entitlements; and (2) the association between annual leave taking and weekly hours of work. After restricting attention to employees likely to have entitlement to at least 4 weeks of paid annual leave, it is found that the mean number of days of leave taken per year is around 16 and that the majority of employees (63%) take less than 20. The incidence of annual leave taking is found to vary positively with the number of usual weekly hours of work, but the size of this effect is small and weak.