Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Shortening self-report mental health symptom measures through optimal test assembly methods: Development and validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression-4
    Ishihara, M ; Harel, D ; Levis, B ; Levis, AW ; Riehm, KE ; Saadat, N ; Azar, M ; Rice, DB ; Sanchez, TA ; Chiovitti, MJ ; Cuijpers, P ; Gilbody, S ; Ioannidis, JPA ; Kloda, LA ; McMillan, D ; Patten, SB ; Shrier, I ; Arroll, B ; Bombardier, CH ; Butterworth, P ; Carter, G ; Clover, K ; Conwell, Y ; Goodyear-Smith, F ; Greeno, CG ; Hambridge, J ; Harrison, PA ; Hudson, M ; Jetté, N ; Kiely, KM ; McGuire, A ; Pence, BW ; Rooney, AG ; Sidebottom, A ; Simning, A ; Turner, A ; White, J ; Whooley, MA ; Winkley, K ; Benedetti, A ; Thombs, BD (Wiley, 2019-01-01)
    Background: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a short form of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a self-report questionnaire for assessing depressive symptomatology, using objective criteria. Methods: Responses on the PHQ-9 were obtained from 7,850 English-speaking participants enrolled in 20 primary diagnostic test accuracy studies. PHQ unidimensionality was verified using confirmatory factor analysis, and an item response theory model was fit. Optimal test assembly (OTA) methods identified a maximally precise short form for each possible length between one and eight items, including and excluding the ninth item. The final short form was selected based on prespecified validity, reliability, and diagnostic accuracy criteria. Results: A four-item short form of the PHQ (PHQ-Dep-4) was selected. The PHQ-Dep-4 had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.805. Sensitivity and specificity of the PHQ-Dep-4 were 0.788 and 0.837, respectively, and were statistically equivalent to the PHQ-9 (sensitivity = 0.761, specificity = 0.866). The correlation of total scores with the full PHQ-9 was high (r = 0.919). Conclusion: The PHQ-Dep-4 is a valid short form with minimal loss of information of scores when compared to the full-length PHQ-9. Although OTA methods have been used to shorten patient-reported outcome measures based on objective, prespecified criteria, further studies are required to validate this general procedure for broader use in health research. Furthermore, due to unexamined heterogeneity, there is a need to replicate the results of this study in different patient populations.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    The Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Algorithm for Screening to Detect Major Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
    He, C ; Levis, B ; Riehm, KE ; Saadat, N ; Levis, AW ; Azar, M ; Rice, DB ; Krishnan, A ; Wu, Y ; Sun, Y ; Imran, M ; Boruff, J ; Cuijpers, P ; Gilbody, S ; Ioannidis, JPA ; Kloda, LA ; McMillan, D ; Patten, SB ; Shrier, I ; Ziegelstein, RC ; Akena, DH ; Arroll, B ; Ayalon, L ; Baradaran, HR ; Baron, M ; Beraldi, A ; Bombardier, CH ; Butterworth, P ; Carter, G ; Chagas, MHN ; Chan, JCN ; Cholera, R ; Clover, K ; Conwell, Y ; de Man-van Ginkel, JM ; Fann, JR ; Fischer, FH ; Fung, D ; Gelaye, B ; Goodyear-Smith, F ; Greeno, CG ; Hall, BJ ; Harrison, PA ; Harter, M ; Hegerl, U ; Hides, L ; Hobfoll, SE ; Hudson, M ; Hyphantis, TN ; Inagaki, M ; Ismail, K ; Jette, N ; Khamseh, ME ; Kiely, KM ; Kwan, Y ; Lamers, F ; Liu, S-I ; Lotrakul, M ; Loureiro, SR ; Loewe, B ; Marsh, L ; McGuire, A ; Mohd-Sidik, S ; Munhoz, TN ; Muramatsu, K ; Osorio, FL ; Patel, V ; Pence, BW ; Persoons, P ; Picardi, A ; Reuter, K ; Rooney, AG ; da Silva dos Santos, IS ; Shaaban, J ; Sidebottom, A ; Simning, A ; Stafford, L ; Sung, S ; Tan, PLL ; Turner, A ; van Weert, HCPM ; White, J ; Whooley, MA ; Winkley, K ; Yamada, M ; Thombs, BD ; Benedetti, A (KARGER, 2020-01)
    BACKGROUND: Screening for major depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) can be done using a cutoff or the PHQ-9 diagnostic algorithm. Many primary studies publish results for only one approach, and previous meta-analyses of the algorithm approach included only a subset of primary studies that collected data and could have published results. OBJECTIVE: To use an individual participant data meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of two PHQ-9 diagnostic algorithms for detecting major depression and compare accuracy between the algorithms and the standard PHQ-9 cutoff score of ≥10. METHODS: Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, Web of Science (January 1, 2000, to February 7, 2015). Eligible studies that classified current major depression status using a validated diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Data were included for 54 of 72 identified eligible studies (n participants = 16,688, n cases = 2,091). Among studies that used a semi-structured interview, pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval) were 0.57 (0.49, 0.64) and 0.95 (0.94, 0.97) for the original algorithm and 0.61 (0.54, 0.68) and 0.95 (0.93, 0.96) for a modified algorithm. Algorithm sensitivity was 0.22-0.24 lower compared to fully structured interviews and 0.06-0.07 lower compared to the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Specificity was similar across reference standards. For PHQ-9 cutoff of ≥10 compared to semi-structured interviews, sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval) were 0.88 (0.82-0.92) and 0.86 (0.82-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The cutoff score approach appears to be a better option than a PHQ-9 algorithm for detecting major depression.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Wu, Y ; Levis, B ; Riehm, KE ; Saadat, N ; Levis, AW ; Azar, M ; Rice, DB ; Boruff, J ; Cuijpers, P ; Gilbody, S ; Ioannidis, JPA ; Kloda, LA ; McMillan, D ; Patten, SB ; Shrier, I ; Ziegelstein, RC ; Akena, DH ; Arroll, B ; Ayalon, L ; Baradaran, HR ; Baron, M ; Bombardier, CH ; Butterworth, P ; Carter, G ; Chagas, MH ; Chan, JCN ; Cholera, R ; Conwell, Y ; de Man-van Ginkel, JM ; Fann, JR ; Fischer, FH ; Fung, D ; Gelaye, B ; Goodyear-Smith, F ; Greeno, CG ; Hall, BJ ; Harrison, PA ; Härter, M ; Hegerl, U ; Hides, L ; Hobfoll, SE ; Hudson, M ; Hyphantis, T ; Inagaki, MD ; Jetté, N ; Khamseh, ME ; Kiely, KM ; Kwan, Y ; Lamers, F ; Liu, S-I ; Lotrakul, M ; Loureiro, SR ; Löwe, B ; McGuire, A ; Mohd-Sidik, S ; Munhoz, TN ; Muramatsu, K ; Osório, FL ; Patel, V ; Pence, BW ; Persoons, P ; Picardi, A ; Reuter, K ; Rooney, AG ; Santos, IS ; Shaaban, J ; Sidebottom, A ; Simning, A ; Stafford, MD ; Sung, S ; Tan, PLL ; Turner, A ; van Weert, HC ; White, J ; Whooley, MA ; Winkley, K ; Yamada, M ; Benedetti, A ; Thombs, BD (Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2020)
    BACKGROUND: Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) queries about thoughts of death and self-harm, but not suicidality. Although it is sometimes used to assess suicide risk, most positive responses are not associated with suicidality. The PHQ-8, which omits Item 9, is thus increasingly used in research. We assessed equivalency of total score correlations and the diagnostic accuracy to detect major depression of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9. METHODS: We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis. We fit bivariate random-effects models to assess diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: 16 742 participants (2097 major depression cases) from 54 studies were included. The correlation between PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 scores was 0.996 (95% confidence interval 0.996 to 0.996). The standard cutoff score of 10 for the PHQ-9 maximized sensitivity + specificity for the PHQ-8 among studies that used a semi-structured diagnostic interview reference standard (N = 27). At cutoff 10, the PHQ-8 was less sensitive by 0.02 (-0.06 to 0.00) and more specific by 0.01 (0.00 to 0.01) among those studies (N = 27), with similar results for studies that used other types of interviews (N = 27). For all 54 primary studies combined, across all cutoffs, the PHQ-8 was less sensitive than the PHQ-9 by 0.00 to 0.05 (0.03 at cutoff 10), and specificity was within 0.01 for all cutoffs (0.00 to 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 total scores were similar. Sensitivity may be minimally reduced with the PHQ-8, but specificity is similar.