- Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research - Research Publications
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemThe Rise of Trade Marking in Australia in the 1990sLOUNDES, JE ; ROGERS, M (Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, 2003)
-
ItemCost focussed firms and Internet usageLoundes, J. ( 2002-12)This paper looks at Internet usage by Australian firms that have a cost focussed competitive strategy. The data source for this analysis is the Melbourne Institute Business Survey, conducted by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research. The survey was conducted in late 2001, and targeted large Australian firms. Instrumental variables estimation found that cost-focussed organizations utilised the Internet more intensively for both internal organizational activities and external market activities than organizations that did not have a high focus on costs. However, this impact appeared greater for internal organizational activities, suggesting that these firms possibly believed that there were greater cost savings and efficiency gains-at least in terms of Internet usage-to be had in using the Internet as part of the internal operations of the organization.
-
ItemFirm performance and investment in R&D and intellectual propertyROGERS, MARK ( 2002-07)This paper analyses the relationship between innovation - proxied by Research and Development (R&D), patent and trade mark activity - and profitability in a panel of Australian firms (1995 to 1998). Special attention is given to assessing the nature of competitive conditions faced by different firms, as the nature of competition is likely to affect the returns to innovation. The hypothesis is that lower levels of competition will imply higher returns to innovation. To allow for a time lag time before any return to innovation, the market value of the firms is used as a proxy for expected future profits. The results give some support for the main hypothesis: the market's valuation of R&D activity is higher in industries where competition is lower. However, the paper highlights the difficulty in assessing competitive conditions and finds a number of results that challenge the simple hypothesis.