School of BioSciences - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    COVID-19 vaccine coverage targets to inform reopening plans in a low incidence setting
    Conway, E ; Walker, CR ; Baker, C ; Lydeamore, MJ ; Ryan, GE ; Campbell, T ; Miller, JC ; Rebuli, N ; Yeung, M ; Kabashima, G ; Geard, N ; Wood, J ; McCaw, JM ; McVernon, J ; Golding, N ; Price, DJ ; Shearer, FM (ROYAL SOC, 2023-08-30)
    Since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in 2019 through to mid-2021, much of the Australian population lived in a COVID-19-free environment. This followed the broadly successful implementation of a strong suppression strategy, including international border closures. With the availability of COVID-19 vaccines in early 2021, the national government sought to transition from a state of minimal incidence and strong suppression activities to one of high vaccine coverage and reduced restrictions but with still-manageable transmission. This transition is articulated in the national 're-opening' plan released in July 2021. Here, we report on the dynamic modelling study that directly informed policies within the national re-opening plan including the identification of priority age groups for vaccination, target vaccine coverage thresholds and the anticipated requirements for continued public health measures-assuming circulation of the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant. Our findings demonstrated that adult vaccine coverage needed to be at least 60% to minimize public health and clinical impacts following the establishment of community transmission. They also supported the need for continued application of test-trace-isolate-quarantine and social measures during the vaccine roll-out phase and beyond.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    From Climate Change to Pandemics: Decision Science Can Help Scientists Have Impact
    Baker, CM ; Campbell, PT ; Chades, I ; Dean, AJ ; Hester, SM ; Holden, MH ; McCaw, JM ; McVernon, J ; Moss, R ; Shearer, FM ; Possingham, HP (FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, 2022-02-14)
    Scientific knowledge and advances are a cornerstone of modern society. They improve our understanding of the world we live in and help us navigate global challenges including emerging infectious diseases, climate change and the biodiversity crisis. However, there is a perpetual challenge in translating scientific insight into policy. Many articles explain how to better bridge the gap through improved communication and engagement, but we believe that communication and engagement are only one part of the puzzle. There is a fundamental tension between science and policy because scientific endeavors are rightfully grounded in discovery, but policymakers formulate problems in terms of objectives, actions and outcomes. Decision science provides a solution by framing scientific questions in a way that is beneficial to policy development, facilitating scientists’ contribution to public discussion and policy. At its core, decision science is a field that aims to pinpoint evidence-based management strategies by focussing on those objectives, actions, and outcomes defined through the policy process. The importance of scientific discovery here is in linking actions to outcomes, helping decision-makers determine which actions best meet their objectives. In this paper we explain how problems can be formulated through the structured decision-making process. We give our vision for what decision science may grow to be, describing current gaps in methodology and application. By better understanding and engaging with the decision-making processes, scientists can have greater impact and make stronger contributions to important societal problems.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Influencing public health policy with data-informed mathematical models of infectious diseases: Recent developments and new challenges
    Alahmadi, A ; Belet, S ; Black, A ; Cromer, D ; Flegg, JA ; House, T ; Jayasundara, P ; Keith, JM ; McCaw, JM ; Moss, R ; Ross, J ; Shearer, FM ; Sai, TTT ; Walker, J ; White, L ; Whyte, JM ; Yan, AWC ; Zarebski, AE (ELSEVIER, 2020-09)
    Modern data and computational resources, coupled with algorithmic and theoretical advances to exploit these, allow disease dynamic models to be parameterised with increasing detail and accuracy. While this enhances models' usefulness in prediction and policy, major challenges remain. In particular, lack of identifiability of a model's parameters may limit the usefulness of the model. While lack of parameter identifiability may be resolved through incorporation into an inference procedure of prior knowledge, formulating such knowledge is often difficult. Furthermore, there are practical challenges associated with acquiring data of sufficient quantity and quality. Here, we discuss recent progress on these issues.