Economics - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 35
-
ItemChanging the Life Trajectories of Australia's Most Vulnerable Children - Report No. 2 The first twelve months in the Early Years Education Program: An initial assessment of the impact on children and their primary caregivers(Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, 2018)This report presents initial findings on the impact on children and their primary caregivers after twelve months of enrollment in the Early Years Education Program (EYEP). EYEP is a model of early years care and education targeted at the particular needs of children who are exposed to significant family stress and social disadvantage. Children who participate in EYEP are offered three years of care and education (50 weeks per year, five hours per day each week). Key features of EYEP are high staff/child ratios, qualified and experienced staff, an infant mental health consultant in the team and a rigorously developed curriculum. A relationship-based pedagogy is used to ensure that children are ready for learning. The ultimate objective of EYEP is to ensure that at-risk and vulnerable children realise their full potential and arrive at school developmentally and educationally equal to their peers. The impact of EYEP is being evaluated through a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) as part of the Early Years Education Research Program (EYERP); otherwise referred to in this report as the ‘EYEP trial’. Children for whom consent was given to participate in the EYEP trial were randomly assigned into either an intervention group who were enrolled in EYEP or to a control group. Estimates of the impact of EYEP on children and their primary caregivers are derived from comparisons of outcomes between the intervention group and the control group. Measurement of outcomes described in this report took place twelve months after entry to the trial.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableThe emotional consequences of donation opportunities(Taylor & Francis, 2017-03-04)Charities often circulate widespread donation appeals to garner support for campaigns, but what impact do these campaigns have on the well-being of individuals who choose to donate, those who choose not to donate, and the entire group exposed to the campaign? Here we investigate these questions by exploring the changes in affect reported by individuals who donate in response to a charitable request and those who do not. We also look at the change in affect reported by the entire sample to measure the net impact of the donation request. Results reveal that large donors experience hedonic boosts from their charitable actions, and the substantial fraction of large donors translates to a net positive influence on the well-being of the entire sample. Thus, under certain conditions, donation opportunities can enable people to help others while also increasing the overall well-being of the population of potential donors.
-
ItemRegional Differences in the Severity of Recessions in the UK(Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, 2007)
-
ItemThe Optimal Composition of Government Expenditure(Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, 2007)
-
ItemThe truncated core for games with limited aspirations(Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, 2007)
-
ItemUnemployment Rate Dispersion in Melbourne: The Regional Dimension(Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, 2007)
-
ItemUnemployment Rate Dispersion within Australian Cities(Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, 2007)
-
ItemOptimal licensing policy in differentiated industries(WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2005-03-01)
-
ItemModels with two or more public goods(Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, 2004)
-
ItemParametric continuity of stationary distributions(Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, 2004)