Accounting - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 41
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Superstar Productivity and Pay: Evidence from the Australian Football League
    Ferguson, PJ ; Pinnuck, M (WILEY, 2022-06)
    We use game‐level data from the Australian Football League (AFL) to examine superstar workers' productivity and pay. By exploiting teams' injury‐induced line‐up changes between games, we show that, compared with replacement‐level players, superstars increase their teams' likelihood of winning away games by approximately 15 percentage points. While we then show that betting markets appear to appropriately price superstars' marginal productivity, we present back‐of‐the‐envelope calculations that suggest that teams underpay superstar players by at least 30 per cent. We discuss how inaccurate performance evaluations, labour market regulations, long‐term back‐loaded contracts, clubs' attempts to reduce harmful intra‐team pay disparities and on‐field success as a form of payment‐in‐kind may explain our findings.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Frequency and nature of the reporting of going concern by auditors in the financial statements of Australian listed companies
    Pinnuck, M ; Wallis, M (Australian Accounting Standards Board, 2022-11-01)
    This report presents descriptive statistics on the reporting of going concern in the audit reports of financial statements of ASX listed companies. Analysis is presented for Australia and the World (hereafter referred to as RoW) based on the financial statements for the financial year 2021 and across the 2010-2020 period. The objective is to provide a ‘stocktake’ of the current reporting of going concern by auditors which may provide some useful background information for identifying areas of economic importance for further investigation and the policy deliberations.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Does stock market liberalization improve stock price efficiency? Evidence from China
    Chen, Y ; Huang, J ; Li, X ; Yuan, Q (Wiley, 2022-07)
    In this study, we examine whether liberalization of the stock market improves stock price efficiency using China's market liberalization pilot program as a shock. We find that investible firms exhibit a significant increase in price efficiency, as proxied by stock price non-synchronicity, after stock market liberalization. The results are robust to a series of tests and remain unchanged after we address the issue of endogeneity. We identify two channels through which price efficiency can be improved: better disclosure by firms and the incorporation of more information into stock prices through the trading activities of foreign investors. We also find that investment becomes more sensitive to prices, further indicating that stock prices have become more efficient. Finally, we find that stock price informativeness also increases.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Does a Liability of Foreignness in Liquidity Apply to US IPOs?
    Banti, C ; Biddle, G ; Jona, J (Taylor & Francis, 2022-11-30)
    We provide evidence regarding two unanswered and consequential questions regarding share trading liquidity, a primary motive for US listings, for the prominent listing cohort of foreign-firm US initial public offerings (FIPOs). First, we test whether FIPOs exhibit a ‘liability of foreignness (Bell et al. 2012) in liquidity’ (LFL) compared with matched domestic-firm IPOs (DIPOs), despite listing requirements that are more stringent than for the mature cross-listed foreign firms studied previously. Second, we test whether US IPO LFL is moderated by FIPO home country institutional attributes that promote liquidity. Our findings for 327 FIPOs from 36 countries between 1990 and 2012 reveal that US IPO LFL is moderated, but not eliminated, by FIPO home country attributes, thus indicating incomplete bonding with US institutions. These findings extend prior research and serve to inform foreign firms considering US IPOs, exchanges competing for them, listing facilitators, regulators, and investors regarding a salient listing consideration.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Voluntary versus mandatory disclosure of liability insurance coverage limit
    Jia, X ; Suijs, J (Elsevier BV, 2022-11)
    This article analyzes the disclosure of the liability insurance coverage limit and the impact of mandating disclosure of the coverage limit in a setting where voluntary disclosure of a firm’s cash flow information is subject to litigation risk and the firm has directors’ and officers’ (D&O) liability insurance. Disclosure of cash flow information is costly, but disclosure of the insurance coverage limit features no direct disclosure friction. We find that, when the litigation environment is weak, the usual unraveling argument applies, and the manager always voluntarily discloses the coverage limit in equilibrium. However, when the litigation environment is strong, either no coverage limit is disclosed or only sufficiently high coverage limits are disclosed in equilibrium. Further analysis shows that mandatory disclosure of the coverage limit increases the voluntary disclosure of cash flow information.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Going Concern Uncertainty: What Do Firms Disclose?
    Bradbury, M ; Fargher, N ; Potter, B ; Taylor, S (WILEY, 2022-09)
    Abstract We examine disclosure of going concern uncertainties by Australian companies. We begin by outlining the extant reporting framework applicable from accounting and auditing standards, and compare the approach to this issue taken across several different countries – Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. We then examine reporting of going concern uncertainties for a selection of 127 Australian companies reporting at 30 June 2020 that also receive modified audit reports highlighting going concern issues. Our results indicate substantial variation in the specific requirements of audit and accounting standards impacting going concern disclosure across jurisdictions, with relevant disclosure guidance for Australian entities primarily contained in auditing, rather than accounting, standards. Not surprisingly then, we also observe significant variation in management reporting practices. These results inform our understanding of existing disclosure requirements and highlight how regulatory reliance on auditor discussion of going concern issues likely results in relatively limited management disclosure. We suggest that additional guidance may be required from accounting standard setters and also regulators with respect to management discussion of going concern uncertainty.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The effect of trade secrets protection on disclosure of forward‐looking financial information
    Li, Y ; Li, Y (Wiley, 2020)
    Using the recognition of the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine (IDD) by US state courts as an exogenous shock to the risk of losing trade secrets, this study examines the effects of trade secrets on disclosure of forward‐looking financial information. We find that management earnings forecast frequency and forecast horizon increases after the US state where a firm is headquartered starts to recognize IDD. We also find that the effect of IDD recognition on management forecasts is more pronounced for firms that have larger market shares, higher product market competition, more intensive R&D, shorter distance to their industry rivals, and more employees who possess knowledge of the firms’ trade secrets.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Explanations as Discourse: Towards Ethical Big Data Analytics Services
    Afrashteh, S ; Someh, I ; Davern, M (Australasian Association for Information Systems and Australian Computer Society, 2020-01-01)
    Big data analytics uses algorithms for decision-making and targeting of customers. These algorithms process large-scale data sets and create efficiencies in the decision-making process for organizations but are often incomprehensible to customers and inherently opaque in nature. Recent European Union regulations require that organizations communicate meaningful information to customers on the use of algorithms and the reasons behind decisions made about them. In this paper, we explore the use of explanations in big data analytics services. We rely on discourse ethics to argue that explanations can facilitate a balanced communication between organizations and customers, leading to transparency and trust for customers as well as customer engagement and reduced reputation risks for organizations. We conclude the paper by proposing future empirical research directions.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Asbestos Contamination: Governance and Financial Reporting Issues in the Public, Private and Not-for-profit Sectors
    McGregor, W ; Potter, B ; Soderstrom, N ; Stevenson, K (WILEY, 2021-12)
    Abstract We explore implications of asbestos for the measurement and reporting of liabilities, assets and expenses by diverse entities. We argue that entities in both public and private sectors are failing to recognise or appropriately measure liabilities related to asbestos and that the implications of asbestos for assets and expenses in financial statements are rarely reported. While we focus on recognition and measurement implications for Australian entities, we also examine relevant requirements in other jurisdictions and for sustainability reporting.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Less Information, More Comparison, and Better Performance: Evidence from a Field Experiment
    Eyring, H ; Ferguson, PJ ; Koppers, S (WILEY, 2021-05)
    ABSTRACT We use a field experiment in professional sports to compare effects of providing absolute, relative, or both absolute and relative measures in performance reports for employees. Although studies have documented that the provision of these types of measures can benefit performance, theory from economic and accounting literature suggests that it may be optimal for firms to direct employees’ attention to some types of measures by omitting others. In line with this theory, we find that relative performance information alone yields the best performance effects in our setting—that is, that a subset of information (relative performance information) dominates the full information set (absolute and relative performance information together) in boosting performance. In cross‐sectional and survey‐data analyses, we do not find that restricting the number of measures shown per se benefits performance. Rather, we find that restricting the type of measures shown to convey only relative information increases involvement in peer‐performance comparison, benefitting performance. Our findings extend research on weighting of and responses to measures in performance reports.