Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The SENSE study (Sleep and Education: learning New Skills Early): postintervention effects of a randomised controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based group sleep improvement intervention among at-risk adolescents
    Blake, Matthew John ( 2016)
    Objective: There is growing recognition that many adolescents obtain insufficient and/or poor quality sleep. Sleep problems are also a major risk factor for the emergence of mental health problems in adolescence. However, few studies have examined disturbed sleep as a potential mechanism in the treatment and prevention of mental health problems among adolescents. Adolescent sleep problems can be treated using a range of approaches. School-based sleep education programs, which are typically delivered to whole school classes, have been shown to have little impact on sleep behaviour or mental health. Cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based sleep programs, which are typically delivered to at-risk or already symptomatic adolescents, have been shown to be more effective in improving sleep and emotional distress, but studies evaluating their effectiveness have been limited in several ways, including small sample sizes and inadequate/lack of control groups. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural sleep interventions among adolescents. Searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were performed from inception to 1 May 2016. Eight trials were selected (n=234, mean age=15.24 years; female=63.18%). Main outcomes were subjective (sleep diary/questionnaire) and objective (actigraphy) total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), sleep efficiency (SE), and wake after sleep onset (WASO). There was a small number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs; n=3), and a high risk of bias across the RCTs; therefore within sleep condition meta-analyses were examined. At post-intervention, subjective TST improved by 29.47 minutes (95% CI = 17.18, 41.75), SOL by 21.44 minutes (95% CI = -30.78, -12.11), SE by 5.34% (95% CI = 2.64, 8.04), and WASO by a medium effect size (d = 0.59 [95% CI = 0.36, 0.82). Objective SOL improved by 16.15 minutes (95% CI = -26.13, -6.17), and SE by 2.82% (95% CI = 0.58, 5.07). Global sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, depression, and anxiety also improved. Gains were generally maintained over time. Our meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence that cognitive-behavioural sleep interventions are an effective treatment for adolescent sleep problems, producing clinically meaningful responses within active treatment conditions. Their efficacy is maintained over time, and results in significant alleviation of sleep problems and improvement in functional outcomes. However, further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings. The aim of this thesis was to investigate the post-intervention effects of a cognitive-behavioural/mindfulness-based group sleep intervention on sleep, mental health, and cognitive style among at-risk adolescents. The study went beyond simply measuring treatment outcomes to also evaluate mechanisms of change. Based on the behavioural, cognitive, hyperarousal, and transdiagnostic models of insomnia, a number of specific mediators were hypothesised to account for therapeutic change in cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based sleep interventions for adolescents, including earlier bedtimes, more consistent bedtimes, increased sleep hygiene awareness, and decreased dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep, worry, rumination, pre-sleep arousal, anxiety, and depression. Method: A RCT was conducted across Victorian secondary schools in Melbourne, Australia. Adolescents (aged 12-17 years) were recruited using a two-stage procedure, consisting of an in-school screening (n=1491) followed by a diagnostic interview for those meeting screening criteria (n=218), to identify students with high levels of anxiety and sleeping difficulties, but without past or current major depressive disorder (n=144). Eligible participants were randomised into either a sleep improvement intervention (‘Sleep SENSE’) or an active control ‘study skills’ intervention (‘Study SENSE’). One hundred twenty three participants began the interventions (Female=60%; Mean Age=14.48, SD=0.95), with 60 in the sleep condition and 63 in the control condition. All participants were required to complete a battery of mood, sleep and cognitive style questionnaires, seven-days of wrist actigraphy (an objective measurement of sleep), and sleep diary entry at pre-and-post intervention. Results: The sleep intervention condition was associated with significantly greater improvements in subjective sleep (global sleep quality, sleep onset latency, daytime sleepiness), objective sleep onset latency, anxiety, pre-sleep arousal, and sleep knowledge compared with the control intervention condition, with small-medium effect sizes. Parallel multiple mediation models showed that there were bidirectional relationships between improvements in subjective sleep quality and pre-sleep arousal/global anxiety. Conclusion: The SENSE study is an efficacy trial of a selective group-based sleep intervention for the treatment and prevention of sleep and mental health problems among at-risk adolescents experiencing both sleep and anxiety disturbance. The study provides evidence, using a methodologically rigorous design, including an active control comparison condition, that a multi-component group sleep intervention that includes cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based therapies, can improve wakefulness in bed variables, daytime dysfunction, anxiety, pre-sleep arousal, and sleep knowledge among at-risk adolescents. The results also provide evidence that pre-sleep arousal and anxiety are particularly important for adolescents’ perceived sleep quality, and should be key targets for new treatments of adolescent sleep problems. Public Health Significance: Given the high prevalence of adolescent sleep and internalising problems, the implications of an effective adolescent sleep intervention for clinical practice and public policy are potentially significant. However, changing sleep behaviour, especially objective measures of sleep, in this age group, has been challenging. This thesis shows that the Sleep-SENSE program can improve objective and subjective indices of sleep, as well as anxiety symptoms, when compared to an active control intervention. The results also showed that reductions in pre-sleep hyperarousal represent a key psychophysiological mechanism for therapeutic improvements in subjective sleep problems among anxious adolescents, and that cognitive behavioural and mindfulness-based sleep interventions should be directed towards adolescents with vulnerability for hyperarousal. Sleep SENSE is one of the only interventions demonstrated to be efficacious in improving sleep and mental health amongst vulnerable adolescents. Furthermore, the program is likely to be cost-effective - it involves a simple screening process and a group intervention format - and could be disseminated to a wide range of clinical and non-clinical settings in primary care, mental health, adolescent health and sleep medicine, and may assist in the treatment and prevention of adolescent sleep and mental health problems. The intervention also lends itself to flexible modes of delivery (e.g., non-specialist practitioners, group settings, individual settings, school-based, internet and other e-health modes of delivery), further enhancing its translational potential.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Investigating anxiety and depression in adults with low intellectual ability
    Edwards, Stephen Langley ( 2016)
    Adults with low ability have been routinely excluded from general population research that supports cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression. Even studies using samples of adults with ability below average exclude potential participants with profound and severe intellectual disability, without testing task-specific capacity. Consequently, little is known about the viability of cognitive models of anxiety and depression amongst adults with low ability. The present study addresses this through four main lines of enquiry: inclusion of all abilities through screening and validity procedures; prevalence of signs and symptoms of anxiety and depression as well as the impact of life stressors on these; cognitions and their specificity for anxiety and depression; and the impact of anxiety and ability on attentional responses to emotional stimuli. A sample of 70 adults from each level of low ability, unselected for signs or symptoms of anxiety and depression, was recruited from community-based disability support services. Participants were screened for general (receptive language) and task-specific abilities, interviewed for symptoms of anxiety and depression and disorder related cognitions then administered a visual-probe task with emotional face stimuli. Informants provided data on signs of mental ill-health, stressful life events and adaptive behaviour. Task-specific validity procedures governed data included for analysis. The inclusionary approach meant participants from all ability levels below average were included. Task-specific screening measures were superior to receptive language in predicting validity on research tasks, especially for participants with severe and profound intellectual disability. Dimensional measurements meant ability variables could be covaried or controlled in most analyses. Mean levels of signs and symptoms were lower than those in available reference studies, as were the rates of clinical level cases. General ability was positively correlated with signs of anxiety and depression but was not related to symptoms. Similarly, the number of life events was correlated with all scales on the measure of signs but not with symptoms of anxiety or depression. The lack of concordance highlights the gap between what informants see and what respondents think and feel. Learning a person’s subjective interpretation of events can help understand their emotions and behaviour. Depressive cognitions uniquely predicted significant variance in symptoms of depression but only ability, rather than anxious cognitions, predicted anxiety symptoms. Cognitive content-specificity for depression bolsters support for the use of cognitive behaviour therapy but further research into the relationship between ability and anxiety is required. The lack of directional bias in selective attention to emotional faces in any of the anxiety or ability groups means cognitive-motivational theory was not supported but future studies should address methodological issues. Attentional control theory was supported but the slowing of emotional face processing caused by high anxiety, but not depression needs replication. Trials of attentional training may be justified to reduce anxiety. Further research into cognitive models of anxiety and depression is urgently needed and future studies should ask theoretical as well as clinical questions.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Temperament change during adolescence: Normative growth trajectories and the association of temperament change and pubertal development factors with adolescent psychopathology
    FRANKLIN, TAMSEN ( 2016)
    Purpose of the study: This study examined the nature of temperament change during adolescence, using a longitudinal design to describe normative changes and individual heterogeneity in the developmental trajectories of traits. The study design allowed for further investigation of whether individual changes in temperament are associated with specific risk for depressive disorders. Pubertal timing and tempo were examined as developmentally salient factors that may potentially contribute to individual level changes in traits, including changes associated with depressive disorders. Method: A community sample of 245 adolescents participated in the longitudinal assessment of four temperament traits (Affiliation, Effortful Control, Negative Emotionality, Surgency), using the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire, across five time points from early adolescence (mean age 11.62 years) to late adolescence (mean age 18.88 years). Univariate and multivariate latent growth modelling approaches, including latent growth models, latent class growth models and growth mixture models, were used to analyse normative and individual trajectories of temperament change. Adolescent depression was assessed via a questionnaire measure of symptoms and clinical interviewing to determine case level depressive disorders. To examine the specificity of associations between temperament and depression, questionnaire and interview measures were also used to assess adolescents’ broader risk for psychopathology, including anxiety and externalising symptoms and case level disorders. Pubertal timing and tempo were assessed during early adolescence using measures based on the Pubertal Development Scale. Results: Analyses of normative temperament trajectories revealed non-linear changes for Affiliation, Negative Emotionality and Surgency, reflecting both increases and decreases in temperament maturity during adolescence. The normative trajectory for Effortful Control showed linear decreases across adolescence. There was evidence of significant heterogeneity of temperament development, including individual differences in baseline levels of traits and in the degree and direction of change. The extent of heterogeneity was more sufficiently represented by significant individual level variance around univariate trajectories of normative change, rather than by sub-groups of individuals in multivariate models. Increased risk for depression was associated with lower baseline Surgency and Effortful Control, higher baseline Negative Emotionality and overall decreases in Affiliation, as well as relatively greater decreases in Effortful Control and slower decreases in Negative Emotionality compared with same age and gender peers. However, while specific risk for depressive disorders was associated with decreases in Affiliation during adolescence, further associations were observed between baseline levels and changes in traits with other categories of psychopathology. There was no evidence that pubertal timing and tempo are sources of temperament change during adolescence, however pubertal timing showed significant associations with adolescent psychopathology. Conclusions: This study contributes to existing literature on temperament that describes adolescence as a developmental period when normative temperament changes do not show overall increases in maturity. This study also highlights the need for further research to identify sources of temperament change during adolescence, as pubertal timing and temperament may be independent risk factors for psychopathology during adolescence. The findings add to accumulating evidence suggesting that changes in temperament influence an individual’s level of risk for adolescent psychopathology, over and above risk from baseline levels of traits. This includes evidence of temperament changes that confer specific risk for depression, including decreases in Affiliation, rather than general risk for psychopathology. Such findings may assist with targeting prevention or early intervention efforts against adolescent depression.