Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 1 of 1
-
ItemTemperament change during adolescence: Normative growth trajectories and the association of temperament change and pubertal development factors with adolescent psychopathology( 2016)Purpose of the study: This study examined the nature of temperament change during adolescence, using a longitudinal design to describe normative changes and individual heterogeneity in the developmental trajectories of traits. The study design allowed for further investigation of whether individual changes in temperament are associated with specific risk for depressive disorders. Pubertal timing and tempo were examined as developmentally salient factors that may potentially contribute to individual level changes in traits, including changes associated with depressive disorders. Method: A community sample of 245 adolescents participated in the longitudinal assessment of four temperament traits (Affiliation, Effortful Control, Negative Emotionality, Surgency), using the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire, across five time points from early adolescence (mean age 11.62 years) to late adolescence (mean age 18.88 years). Univariate and multivariate latent growth modelling approaches, including latent growth models, latent class growth models and growth mixture models, were used to analyse normative and individual trajectories of temperament change. Adolescent depression was assessed via a questionnaire measure of symptoms and clinical interviewing to determine case level depressive disorders. To examine the specificity of associations between temperament and depression, questionnaire and interview measures were also used to assess adolescents’ broader risk for psychopathology, including anxiety and externalising symptoms and case level disorders. Pubertal timing and tempo were assessed during early adolescence using measures based on the Pubertal Development Scale. Results: Analyses of normative temperament trajectories revealed non-linear changes for Affiliation, Negative Emotionality and Surgency, reflecting both increases and decreases in temperament maturity during adolescence. The normative trajectory for Effortful Control showed linear decreases across adolescence. There was evidence of significant heterogeneity of temperament development, including individual differences in baseline levels of traits and in the degree and direction of change. The extent of heterogeneity was more sufficiently represented by significant individual level variance around univariate trajectories of normative change, rather than by sub-groups of individuals in multivariate models. Increased risk for depression was associated with lower baseline Surgency and Effortful Control, higher baseline Negative Emotionality and overall decreases in Affiliation, as well as relatively greater decreases in Effortful Control and slower decreases in Negative Emotionality compared with same age and gender peers. However, while specific risk for depressive disorders was associated with decreases in Affiliation during adolescence, further associations were observed between baseline levels and changes in traits with other categories of psychopathology. There was no evidence that pubertal timing and tempo are sources of temperament change during adolescence, however pubertal timing showed significant associations with adolescent psychopathology. Conclusions: This study contributes to existing literature on temperament that describes adolescence as a developmental period when normative temperament changes do not show overall increases in maturity. This study also highlights the need for further research to identify sources of temperament change during adolescence, as pubertal timing and temperament may be independent risk factors for psychopathology during adolescence. The findings add to accumulating evidence suggesting that changes in temperament influence an individual’s level of risk for adolescent psychopathology, over and above risk from baseline levels of traits. This includes evidence of temperament changes that confer specific risk for depression, including decreases in Affiliation, rather than general risk for psychopathology. Such findings may assist with targeting prevention or early intervention efforts against adolescent depression.