Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
ItemThe SENSE Study (Sleep and Education: learning New Skills Early): long-term outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based group sleep intervention to prevent depression and improve anxiety in at-risk adolescentsRaniti, Monika Bianca ( 2019)Objective: Depression is one of the most common and debilitating mental health problems and its incidence dramatically increases during adolescence. Accumulating evidence suggests that adolescent depression can be prevented with psychosocial interventions, but there is still insufficient evidence to support their widespread implementation. Notably, there is a need for randomised controlled trials of novel interventions that are delivered to community-based adolescents identified to be at-risk for developing depression (i.e., targeted prevention) rather than the general adolescent population (i.e., universal prevention). Improving sleep represents a promising and innovative therapeutic target for the prevention of adolescent depression. Not only are sleep problems, including insufficient and poor-quality sleep, common during adolescence, they also tend to precipitate the onset of depression. Further, sleep interventions may be especially effective if they are delivered to adolescents experiencing anxiety. Anxiety, particularly generalised anxiety, and sleep problems often co-occur, and anxiety is also a risk factor for the development of depression. Evidence from a small but growing number of studies indicates that multicomponent cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based sleep interventions can improve sleep in adolescent samples. However, few studies have investigated depression and anxiety outcomes, particularly using randomised controlled designs, active control comparison conditions, extended follow-up periods, a multi-method assessment of sleep (i.e., subjective and objective measures) and mental health (i.e., diagnosis and symptoms) outcomes, and in community-based samples. Notably, no randomised controlled trial has investigated whether a sleep intervention can prevent the first onset of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adolescents. The current study was designed to address these gaps in the literature. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of a seven-week cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based group sleep intervention for the targeted prevention of first onset MDD and improvement of depressive symptoms over a two-year follow-up period in community-based adolescents experiencing concurrent high levels of anxiety symptoms and sleep problems (i.e., ‘at-risk’ for depression). Given the association between sleep and anxiety, notably generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), and dearth of adolescent sleep intervention studies investigating anxiety outcomes, the secondary and exploratory aim of the study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of the sleep intervention for preventing the incidence of GAD and improving anxiety symptoms over a two-year follow-up period. Importantly, the study aimed to demonstrate that any beneficial effects to depression and/or anxiety outcomes occurred via the putative mechanism of improvements to subjective and objective indices of sleep. As best can be determined, the research reported in this thesis represents the only attempt to date to prevent first onset MDD by improving sleep in an adolescent sample, and the only randomised controlled trial of an adolescent sleep intervention to examine anxiety outcomes over a two-year follow-up period. It was predicted that, compared to adolescents allocated to the active control (study skills) intervention, adolescents allocated to the sleep treatment intervention would: show greater improvements in subjective and objective indices of sleep (i.e., reduced sleep onset latency, increased total sleep time, better overall sleep quality, and reduced weekday bedtime intra-individual variability and weekday-to-weekend bedtime shift) immediately following the intervention and over the two-year follow-up period; be less likely to develop first onset MDD during, and would report lower levels of depressive symptoms at, the two-year follow-up (primary outcomes); and would be less likely to develop new onset GAD during, and would report lower levels of anxiety symptoms at, the two-year follow-up (secondary outcomes). Further, it was predicted that any beneficial long-term effects for depression and anxiety outcomes (i.e., lower incidence of MDD or GAD and/or reduction in depressive and anxiety symptoms) would be significantly mediated by improvements in sleep associated with the sleep treatment intervention (i.e., sleep improvements immediately post-intervention and/or over the two-year follow-up period). Methods: Participant recruitment and eligibility assessments occurred from January 2013 to June 2014. A school-based screening (n = 1491) was conducted at 23 secondary schools (14 Government, 4 Catholic, 5 Independent) in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, to identify community-based adolescents with high levels of self-reported sleeping problems (score > 4 on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; PSQI) and anxiety symptoms (score > 32 males/ > 38 female on the Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale; SCAS). Consenting participants who met screening criteria (n = 218) completed semi-structured diagnostic clinical interview (Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for school-age children-Present and Lifetime version; K-SADS-PL) at the University of Melbourne, primarily to exclude individuals (n = 30) with a lifetime history of MDD, consistent with the study’s aim to prevent first onset depression. Eligible participants (n = 144) were randomised (1:1 allocation on an individual basis, and conditions were balanced for age, gender and presence or absence of current anxiety disorder at baseline) to either a seven-week, face-to-face, multicomponent cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based group sleep improvement treatment intervention (Sleep SENSE; n = 71) or an attention-matched active control study skills intervention (Study SENSE; n = 73). The Sleep SENSE intervention aimed to address common sleep problems including insufficient sleep duration, prolonged sleep onset, and variability in sleep timing, and included anxiety management components to assist with managing anxiety during the pre-sleep period. Mental health and sleep were assessed using: the K-SADS-PL (for MDD and GAD diagnosis); the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D; depressive symptoms); the SCAS (anxiety symptoms); the PSQI (self-reported sleep onset latency, total sleep time, overall sleep quality); and week-long actigraphy with sleep diary (objective sleep onset latency, total sleep time, weekday bedtime intra-individual variability, and weekday-to-weekend bedtime shift). Assessments occurred on three occasions–pre-intervention, post-intervention, and two-years after the completion of the intervention. All outcome assessments were administered by researchers who were blind to participants’ intervention assignment. Statistical analyses: All analyses used a modified intention-to-treat approach. Specifically, the final analysed sample (n = 122, sleep treatment n = 62, control intervention n = 60; 60% female; M age = 14.5 years, SD = 0.95, range 12.04 to 16.31 years) included participants who were eligible for and started the interventions, including those who dropped out of the interventions or were lost to follow-up (n = 13) but excluded participants who were identified as ineligible after randomisation (n = 2) and those who were randomised but never started the interventions (sleep treatment n = 10, control intervention n = 10). Latent growth curve modelling with multiple mediation analysis was used to test the effect of condition (i.e., sleep treatment or control intervention) on the long-term depression (i.e., presence or absence of MDD diagnosis, and severity of depressive symptoms) and anxiety (i.e., presence or absence of GAD diagnosis, and severity of anxiety symptoms) outcomes via improvements in the seven sleep variables immediately post-intervention (i.e., ‘initial status’ which was centred at the post-intervention time point) and over the two-year follow-up period (i.e., average linear ‘rate of change’ scaled to represent change per year). That is, the latent growth process of a sleep variable (i.e., the latent variables of initial status and rate of change) was used the mediator in the tested models. In total, 28 separate models were estimated using Mplus (Version 7) software using maximum likelihood estimation with robust standard errors. Results: Regarding the primary outcomes, there was no statistical evidence that the sleep treatment intervention improved subjective or objective indices of sleep immediately post-intervention or over the two-year follow-up period, or significantly predicted the presence or absence of major depressive disorder during, or reductions in depressive symptoms at, the two-year follow-up, relative to the active control intervention. Regarding the secondary outcome, the sleep treatment intervention did not significantly predict reductions on anxiety symptoms at two-year follow-up. However, the sleep treatment intervention significantly reduced the conditional odds of having GAD during the two-year follow-up period by a factor of seven on average, relative to the active control intervention, although confidence intervals suggested a small effect. There were no statistically significant indirect effects in any of the model investigated. Regardless of condition, participants’ subjective (B = -1.77, 95% CI [-3.47, -0.07]) and objective (B = -4.53, 95% CI [-7.96, -1.10]) sleep onset latency and subjective total sleep time (B = -0.18, 95% CI [-0.31, -0.05]) decreased over time, and weekday bedtime intra-individual variability increased over time (B = 7.99, 95% CI [2.11, 13.86]). In addition, poorer subjective sleep quality (B = 1.46, 95% CI [0.38, 2.54]) and less objective total sleep time (B = -3.31, 95% CI [-6.33, -0.28]) immediately post-intervention predicted depressive symptoms at two-year follow-up, and reductions in weekday bedtime intra-individual variability over time were associated with a decreased likelihood of GAD during the two-year follow-up (B = -0.52, 95% CI [-0.86, -0.18]). Conclusions: Together, the findings do not support the long-term efficacy of a targeted multicomponent cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based group sleep intervention for the improvement of sleep problems and prevention of first onset major depressive disorder in a community-based sample of at-risk adolescents. However, they tentatively suggest that anxiety may be more responsive to the sleep intervention than depression. In the context of a robust study design, the findings are hypothesis-generating and raise important considerations for the design of future clinical trials investigating the role of adolescent sleep interventions on emerging psychopathology. Funding: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Grant (APP1027076). Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12612001177842; prospectively registered on 6th November 2012).
ItemSleep, mood, and cognitive vulnerability in adolescents: a naturalistic study over restricted and extended sleep opportunitiesBEI, BEI ( 2013)Introduction: It is well established that for adolescents, school days are associated with sleep restriction, and that insufficient sleep has been linked to mood disturbances. This longitudinal study assessed sleep, mood, and life stress over the school term and vacation periods with restricted and extended sleep opportunities. The relationships between objective and subjective sleep, as well as between sleep and mood were examined. A cognitive model was proposed and tested to assess whether sleep-specific (i.e., dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep) and global (i.e., dysfunctional attitudes) cognitive vulnerabilities played a role in these relationships. Methods: One-hundred and forty-six adolescents (47.3% male) aged 16.2+/-1.0 years (M+/-SD) from the general community wore an actigraph continuously for four weeks: the last week of a school term (Time-E), the following two-week vacation (Time-V), and the first week of the next term (Time-S). Social demographic information, chronotype, and cognitive vulnerabilities were assessed at Time-E. Subjective sleep, symptoms of depression, anxiety, and life stress were repeatedly measured at Time-E, Time-V, Time-S, and the middle of the subsequent school term. Regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between sleep and mood, and structural equation modelling was used to examine changes of variables over time, as well as the moderating roles of cognitive vulnerabilities. Results: Compared with school days, sleep during the vacation was characterized by later timing, longer duration, lower quality and greater variability. Daily changes in actigraphy- measured sleep over the vacation period showed linear delays in sleep timing throughout the vacation, while changes in time-in-bed were non-significant. The first vacation week was characterized by a linear decrease in total sleep time and sleep quality, and these changes stabilized during the second vacation week. Compared to vacations, school terms were associated with higher symptoms of depression, anxiety, and life stress. Poorer sleep quality, particularly poorer subjective perception of sleep quality, was significantly associated with higher symptoms of depression and anxiety. Sleep- specific cognitive vulnerability moderated the relationship between objective and subjective sleep onset latency during extended but not restricted sleep opportunity. After controlling for life stress, global cognitive vulnerability played different moderating roles in the relationship between subjective sleep and mood over school term and vacation periods. Higher global cognitive vulnerability was associated with a stronger relationship between subjective sleep and symptoms of anxiety (but not depression) during the school term, as well as with a stronger relationship between subjective sleep and symptoms of depression (but not anxiety) during the vacation period. Conclusion: Sleep, mood, and life stress changed markedly over the school term and vacation periods. Changes in sleep over the vacation suggested that the recovery from school- related sleep restriction was completed within two weeks’ extended sleep opportunity, and the average sleep duration over this period suggested that sleep requirements in adolescence may be less than conventionally described in the media and in the scientific literature. Cognitive vulnerabilities played important roles in the relationship between sleep and mood. Adolescents with higher cognitive vulnerability might be more emotionally vulnerable towards school-related sleep restriction. These findings have important implications for future studies, as well as practical implications for policies and interventions designed to improve adolescents’ wellbeing.