General Practice and Primary Care - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11343/217

Filters

2021 - 2022 2
Show more
Reset filters

Settings
Statistics
Citations
Author: Emery, Jonathan × Author: Philip, Jennifer × End date: 2022 × Start date: 2020 ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The feasibility of triggers for the integration of Standardised, Early Palliative (STEP) Care in advanced cancer: A phase II trial
    Collins, A ; Sundararajan, V ; Le, B ; Mileshkin, L ; Hanson, S ; Emery, J ; Philip, J (FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, 2022-09-15)
    BACKGROUND: While multiple clinical trials have demonstrated benefits of early palliative care for people with cancer, access to these services is frequently very late if at all. Establishing evidence-based, disease-specific 'triggers' or times for the routine integration of early palliative care may address this evidence-practice gap. AIM: To test the feasibility of using defined triggers for the integration of standardised, early palliative (STEP) care across three advanced cancers. METHOD: Phase II, multi-site, open-label, parallel-arm, randomised trial of usual best practice cancer care +/- STEP Care conducted in four metropolitan tertiary cancer services in Melbourne, Australia in patients with advanced breast, prostate and brain cancer. The primary outcome was the feasibility of using triggers for times of integration of STEP Care, defined as enrolment of at least 30 patients per cancer in 24 months. Triggers were based on hospital admission with metastatic disease (for breast and prostate cancer), or development of disease recurrence (for brain tumour cohort). A mixed method study design was employed to understand issues of feasibility and acceptability underpinning trigger points. RESULTS: The triggers underpinning times for the integration of STEP care were shown to be feasible for brain but not breast or prostate cancers, with enrolment of 49, 6 and 10 patients across the three disease groups respectively. The varied feasibility across these cancer groups suggested some important characteristics of triggers which may aid their utility in future work. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving the implementation of early palliative care as a standardized component of quality care for all oncology patients will require further attention to defining triggers. Triggers which are 1) linked to objective points within the illness course (not dependent on recognition by individual clinicians), 2) Identifiable and visible (heralded through established service-level activities) and 3) Not reliant upon additional screening measures may enhance their feasibility.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Challenges in data linkage - experiences from an upper gastrointestinal cancer data linkage study
    Khan, N ; Ioannou, L ; Pilgrim, C ; Earnest, A ; Maharaj, A ; Croagh, D ; Liew, D ; Atwood, D ; Holland, J ; Philip, J ; Emery, J ; Ijzerman, M ; Brown, W ; Zalcberg, J ; Evans, S (OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2021-09)
    Abstract Background Linked, population-level data is valuable for mapping patterns of care and evaluating health service utilisation, particularly in difficult-to-reach populations. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers have a dismal prognosis, creating difficulties engaging patients in research. The utility of a linked dataset in this population is of high value. Methods Key objectives included identifying the operational and feasibility issues associated with linking Australian state-based administrative and registry data for understanding health service utilisation in UGI cancers. Datasets pertained to hospital admissions, radiotherapy, community health, primary care, palliative care, Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule’s and UGI cancers. Results From a logistical perspective, data access request approval processes varied, with some requiring consent to be sought from individual services contributing data. The availability of unique person-level identifying information varied widely. Additionally, the time period of data capture differed between and within datasets, limiting the quality of the linked data. Significant costs were associated with linking with primary care and Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule’s. Federal dataset linkage required at least a one-year waiting period. Conclusions Whilst in theory data linkage is a powerful mechanism for obtaining population-level data, in reality, there are many logistical and financial barriers to linking multiple datasets. Consequently, critical data, which has the potential to inform policy and improve patient outcomes, cannot be procured. Key messages Logistical and financial challenges are associated with linking administrative and registry datasets for research, limiting the potential of data linkage.