Medical Education - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11343/190

Filters

2010 - 2019 3
3
Reset filters

Settings
Statistics
Citations
Author: Harrison, Simon × Author: Seymour, John × End date: 2019 ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Oseltamivir Resistance in Adult Oncology and Hematology Patients Infected with Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Virus, Australia
    Tramontana, AR ; George, B ; Hurt, AC ; Doyle, JS ; Langan, K ; Reid, AB ; Harper, JM ; Thursky, K ; Worth, LJ ; Dwyer, DE ; Morrissey, CO ; Johnson, PDR ; Buising, KL ; Harrison, SJ ; Seymour, JF ; Ferguson, PE ; Wang, B ; Denholm, JT ; Cheng, AC ; Slavin, M (CENTERS DISEASE CONTROL, 2010-07)
    We describe laboratory-confirmed influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in 17 hospitalized recipients of a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (8 allogeneic) and in 15 patients with malignancy treated at 6 Australian tertiary centers during winter 2009. Ten (31.3%) patients were admitted to intensive care, and 9 of them were HSCT recipients. All recipients of allogeneic HSCT with infection <100 days posttransplantation or severe graft-versus-host disease were admitted to an intensive care unit. In-hospital mortality rate was 21.9% (7/32). The H275Y neuraminidase mutation, which confers oseltamivir resistance developed in 4 of 7 patients with PCR positive for influenza after > or = 4 days of oseltamivir therapy. Three of these 4 patients were critically ill. Oseltamivir resistance in 4 (13.3%) of 30 patients who were administered oseltamivir highlights the need for ongoing surveillance of such resistance and further research on optimal antiviral therapy in the immunocompromised.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A multicentre retrospective comparison of central nervous system prophylaxis strategies among patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
    Cheah, CY ; Herbert, KE ; O'Rourke, K ; Kennedy, GA ; George, A ; Fedele, PL ; Gilbertson, M ; Tan, SY ; Ritchie, DS ; Opat, SS ; Prince, HM ; Dickinson, M ; Burbury, K ; Wolf, M ; Januszewicz, EH ; Tam, CS ; Westerman, DA ; Carney, DA ; Harrison, SJ ; Seymour, JF (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2014-09-09)
    BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a devastating complication; the optimal prophylactic strategy remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, retrospective analysis of patients with DLBCL with high risk for CNS relapse as defined by two or more of: multiple extranodal sites, elevated serum LDH and B symptoms or involvement of specific high-risk anatomical sites. We compared three different strategies of CNS-directed therapy: intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX) with (R)-CHOP 'group 1'; R-CHOP with IT MTX and two cycles of high-dose intravenous (IV) MTX 'group 2'; dose-intensive systemic antimetabolite-containing chemotherapy (Hyper-CVAD or CODOXM/IVAC) with IT/IV MTX 'group 3'. RESULTS: Overall, 217 patients were identified (49, 125 and 43 in groups 1-3, respectively). With median follow-up of 3.4 (range 0.2-18.6) years, 23 CNS relapses occurred (12, 10 and 1 in groups 1-3 respectively). The 3-year actuarial rates (95% CI) of CNS relapse were 18.4% (9.5-33.1%), 6.9% (3.5-13.4%) and 2.3% (0.4-15.4%) in groups 1-3, respectively (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of high-dose IV MTX and/or cytarabine was associated with lower incidence of CNS relapse compared with IT chemotherapy alone. However, these data are limited by their retrospective nature and warrant confirmation in prospective randomised studies.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The Use of Optimal Treatment for DLBCL Is Improving in All Age Groups and Is a Key Factor in Overall Survival, but Non-Clinical Factors Influence Treatment
    Wong Doo, N ; White, VM ; Martin, K ; Bassett, JK ; Prince, HM ; Harrison, SJ ; Jefford, M ; Winship, I ; Millar, JL ; Milne, RL ; Seymour, JF ; Giles, GG (MDPI, 2019-06-26)
    INTRODUCTION: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma for which a cure is usually the therapeutic goal of optimal treatment. Using a large population-based cohort we sought to examine the factors associated with optimal DLBCL treatment and survival. METHODS: DLBCL cases were identified through the population-based Victorian Cancer Registry, capturing new diagnoses for two time periods: 2008-2009 and 2012-2013. Treatment was pre-emptively classified as 'optimal' or 'suboptimal', according to compliance with current treatment guidelines. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to determine factors associated with treatment and survival. RESULTS: Altogether, 1442 DLBCL cases were included. Based on multivariable analysis, delivery of optimal treatment was less likely for those aged ≥80 years (p < 0.001), women (p = 0.012), those with medical comorbidity (p < 0.001), those treated in a non-metropolitan hospital (p = 0.02) and those who were ex-smokers (p = 0.02). Delivery of optimal treatment increased between 2008-2009 and the 2012-2013 (from 60% to 79%, p < 0.001). Delivery of optimal treatment was independently associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.81), p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Delivery of optimal treatment for DLBCL is associated with hospital location and category, highlighting possible demographic variation in treatment patterns. Together with an increase in the proportion of patients receiving optimal treatment in the more recent time period, this suggests that treatment decisions in DLBCL may be subject to non-clinical influences, which may have implications when evaluating equity of treatment access. The positive association with survival emphasizes the importance of delivering optimal treatment in DLBCL.