Psychiatry - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A cautionary note on the use of SIFT in pathological connectomes
    Zalesky, A ; Sarwar, T ; Ramamohanarao, K (WILEY, 2020-03)
  • Item
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1-year follow-up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors
    Kottaram, A ; Johnston, LA ; Tian, Y ; Ganella, EP ; Laskaris, L ; Cocchi, L ; McGorry, P ; Pantelis, C ; Kotagiri, R ; Cropley, V ; Zalesky, A (Wiley, 2020-08-15)
    In a machine learning setting, this study aims to compare the prognostic utility of connectomic, brain structural, and clinical/demographic predictors of individual change in symptom severity in individuals with schizophrenia. Symptom severity at baseline and 1‐year follow‐up was assessed in 30 individuals with a schizophrenia‐spectrum disorder using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Structural and functional neuroimaging was acquired in all individuals at baseline. Machine learning classifiers were trained to predict whether individuals improved or worsened with respect to positive, negative, and overall symptom severity. Classifiers were trained using various combinations of predictors, including regional cortical thickness and gray matter volume, static and dynamic resting‐state connectivity, and/or baseline clinical and demographic variables. Relative change in overall symptom severity between baseline and 1‐year follow‐up varied markedly among individuals (interquartile range: 55%). Dynamic resting‐state connectivity measured within the default‐mode network was the most accurate single predictor of change in positive (accuracy: 87%), negative (83%), and overall symptom severity (77%) at follow‐up. Incorporating predictors based on regional cortical thickness, gray matter volume, and baseline clinical variables did not markedly improve prediction accuracy and the prognostic utility of these predictors in isolation was moderate (<70%). Worsening negative symptoms at 1‐year follow‐up were predicted by hyper‐connectivity and hypo‐dynamism within the default‐mode network at baseline assessment, while hypo‐connectivity and hyper‐dynamism predicted worsening positive symptoms. Given the modest sample size investigated, we recommend giving precedence to the relative ranking of the predictors investigated in this study, rather than the prediction accuracy estimates.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Towards deep learning for connectome mapping: A block decomposition framework
    Sarwar, T ; Seguin, C ; Ramamohanarao, K ; Zalesky, A (ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 2020-05-15)
    We propose a new framework to map structural connectomes using deep learning and diffusion MRI. We show that our framework not only enables connectome mapping with a convolutional neural network (CNN), but can also be straightforwardly incorporated into conventional connectome mapping pipelines to enhance accuracy. Our framework involves decomposing the entire brain volume into overlapping blocks. Blocks are sufficiently small to ensure that a CNN can be efficiently trained to predict each block's internal connectivity architecture. We develop a block stitching algorithm to rebuild the full brain volume from these blocks and thereby map end-to-end connectivity matrices. To evaluate our block decomposition and stitching (BDS) framework independent of CNN performance, we first map each block's internal connectivity using conventional streamline tractography. Performance is evaluated using simulated diffusion MRI data generated from numerical connectome phantoms with known ground truth connectivity. Due to the redundancy achieved by allowing blocks to overlap, we find that our block decomposition and stitching steps per se can enhance the accuracy of probabilistic and deterministic tractography algorithms by up to 20-30%. Moreover, we demonstrate that our framework can improve the strength of structure-function coupling between in vivo diffusion and functional MRI data. We find that structural brain networks mapped with deep learning correlate more strongly with functional brain networks (r ​= ​0.45) than those mapped with conventional tractography (r ​= ​0.36). In conclusion, our BDS framework not only enables connectome mapping with deep learning, but its two constituent steps can be straightforwardly incorporated as part of conventional connectome mapping pipelines to enhance accuracy.