Psychiatry - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 28
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Heterogeneity and Classification of Recent Onset Psychosis and Depression: A Multimodal Machine Learning Approach
    Lalousis, PA ; Wood, SJ ; Schmaal, L ; Chisholm, K ; Griffiths, S ; Reniers, R ; Bertolino, A ; Borgwardt, S ; Brambilla, P ; Kambeitz, J ; Lencer, R ; Pantelis, C ; Ruhrmann, S ; Salokangas, RKR ; Schultze-Lutter, F ; Bonivento, C ; Dwyer, DB ; Ferro, A ; Haidl, T ; Rosen, M ; Schmidt, A ; Meisenzahl, E ; Koutsouleris, N ; Upthegrove, R (Elsevier BV, 2021-05)
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Brain Correlates of Suicide Attempt in 18,925 Participants Across 18 International Cohorts
    Campos, A ; Thompson, PM ; Veltman, DJ ; Pozzi, E ; van Veltzen, LS ; Jahanshad, N ; Adams, MJ ; Baune, BT ; Berger, K ; Brosch, K ; Bulow, R ; Connolly, CG ; Dannlowski, U ; Davey, CG ; de Zubicaray, G ; Dima, D ; Erwin-Grabner, T ; Evans, JW ; Fu, CHY ; Gotlib, IH ; Goya-Maldonado, R ; Grabe, HJ ; Grotegerd, D ; Harris, MA ; Harrison, BJ ; Hatton, SN ; Hermesdorf, M ; Hickie, IB ; Ho, TC ; Kircher, T ; Krug, A ; Lagopoulos, J ; Lemke, H ; McMahon, K ; MacMaster, FP ; Martin, NG ; McIntosh, AM ; Medland, SE ; Meinert, S ; Meller, T ; Nenadic, I ; Opel, N ; Redlich, R ; Reneman, L ; Repple, J ; Sacchet, MD ; Schmitt, S ; Schrantee, A ; Sim, K ; Singh, A ; Stein, F ; Strike, LT ; van Der Wee, NJA ; van Der Werff, SJA ; Volzke, H ; Waltemate, L ; Whalley, HC ; Wittfeld, K ; Wright, MJ ; Yang, TT ; Zarate, CA ; Schmaal, L ; Renteria, ME (ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2021-08-15)
    BACKGROUND: Neuroimaging studies of suicidal behavior have so far been conducted in small samples, prone to biases and false-positive associations, yielding inconsistent results. The ENIGMA-MDD Working Group aims to address the issues of poor replicability and comparability by coordinating harmonized analyses across neuroimaging studies of major depressive disorder and related phenotypes, including suicidal behavior. METHODS: Here, we pooled data from 18 international cohorts with neuroimaging and clinical measurements in 18,925 participants (12,477 healthy control subjects and 6448 people with depression, of whom 694 had attempted suicide). We compared regional cortical thickness and surface area and measures of subcortical, lateral ventricular, and intracranial volumes between suicide attempters, clinical control subjects (nonattempters with depression), and healthy control subjects. RESULTS: We identified 25 regions of interest with statistically significant (false discovery rate < .05) differences between groups. Post hoc examinations identified neuroimaging markers associated with suicide attempt including smaller volumes of the left and right thalamus and the right pallidum and lower surface area of the left inferior parietal lobe. CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses the lack of replicability and consistency in several previously published neuroimaging studies of suicide attempt and further demonstrates the need for well-powered samples and collaborative efforts. Our results highlight the potential involvement of the thalamus, a structure viewed historically as a passive gateway in the brain, and the pallidum, a region linked to reward response and positive affect. Future functional and connectivity studies of suicidal behaviors may focus on understanding how these regions relate to the neurobiological mechanisms of suicide attempt risk.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Heterogeneity and Classification of Recent Onset Psychosis and Depression: A Multimodal Machine Learning Approach
    Lalousis, PA ; Wood, SJ ; Schmaal, L ; Chisholm, K ; Griffiths, SL ; Reniers, RLEP ; Bertolino, A ; Borgwardt, S ; Brambilla, P ; Kambeitz, J ; Lencer, R ; Pantelis, C ; Ruhrmann, S ; Salokangas, RKR ; Schultze-Lutter, F ; Bonivento, C ; Dwyer, D ; Ferro, A ; Haidl, T ; Rosen, M ; Schmidt, A ; Meisenzahl, E ; Koutsouleris, N ; Upthegrove, R (OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2021-07)
    Diagnostic heterogeneity within and across psychotic and affective disorders challenges accurate treatment selection, particularly in the early stages. Delineation of shared and distinct illness features at the phenotypic and brain levels may inform the development of more precise differential diagnostic tools. We aimed to identify prototypes of depression and psychosis to investigate their heterogeneity, with common, comorbid transdiagnostic symptoms. Analyzing clinical/neurocognitive and grey matter volume (GMV) data from the PRONIA database, we generated prototypic models of recent-onset depression (ROD) vs. recent-onset psychosis (ROP) by training support-vector machines to separate patients with ROD from patients with ROP, who were selected for absent comorbid features (pure groups). Then, models were applied to patients with comorbidity, ie, ROP with depressive symptoms (ROP+D) and ROD participants with sub-threshold psychosis-like features (ROD+P), to measure their positions within the affective-psychotic continuum. All models were independently validated in a replication sample. Comorbid patients were positioned between pure groups, with ROP+D patients being more frequently classified as ROD compared to pure ROP patients (clinical/neurocognitive model: χ2 = 14.874; P < .001; GMV model: χ2 = 4.933; P = .026). ROD+P patient classification did not differ from ROD (clinical/neurocognitive model: χ2 = 1.956; P = 0.162; GMV model: χ2 = 0.005; P = .943). Clinical/neurocognitive and neuroanatomical models demonstrated separability of prototypic depression from psychosis. The shift of comorbid patients toward the depression prototype, observed at the clinical and biological levels, suggests that psychosis with affective comorbidity aligns more strongly to depressive rather than psychotic disease processes. Future studies should assess how these quantitative measures of comorbidity predict outcomes and individual responses to stratified therapeutic interventions.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Machine Learning for Large-Scale Quality Control of 3D Shape Models in Neuroimaging
    Petrov, D ; Gutman, BA ; Yu, S-HJ ; Alpert, K ; Zavaliangos-Petropulu, A ; Isaev, D ; Turner, JA ; van Erp, TGM ; Wang, L ; Schmaal, L ; Veltman, D ; Thompson, PM ; Wang, Q ; Shi, Y ; Suk, HI ; Suzuki, K (SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG, 2017)
    As very large studies of complex neuroimaging phenotypes become more common, human quality assessment of MRI-derived data remains one of the last major bottlenecks. Few attempts have so far been made to address this issue with machine learning. In this work, we optimize predictive models of quality for meshes representing deep brain structure shapes. We use standard vertex-wise and global shape features computed homologously across 19 cohorts and over 7500 human-rated subjects, training kernelized Support Vector Machine and Gradient Boosted Decision Trees classifiers to detect meshes of failing quality. Our models generalize across datasets and diseases, reducing human workload by 30-70%, or equivalently hundreds of human rater hours for datasets of comparable size, with recall rates approaching inter-rater reliability.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Childhood adversity impacts on brain subcortical structures relevant to depression
    Frodl, T ; Janowitz, D ; Schmaal, L ; Tozzi, L ; Dobrowolny, H ; Stein, DJ ; Veltman, DJ ; Wittfeld, K ; van Erp, TGM ; Jahanshad, N ; Block, A ; Hegenscheid, K ; Voelzke, H ; Lagopoulos, J ; Hatton, SN ; Hickie, IB ; Frey, EM ; Carballedo, A ; Brooks, SJ ; Vuletic, D ; Uhlmann, A ; Veer, IM ; Walter, H ; Schnell, K ; Grotegerd, D ; Arolt, V ; Kugel, H ; Schramm, E ; Konrad, C ; Zurowski, B ; Baune, BT ; van der Wee, NJA ; van Tol, M-J ; Penninx, BWJH ; Thompson, PM ; Hibar, DP ; Dannlowski, U ; Grabe, HJ (PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, 2017-03)
    Childhood adversity plays an important role for development of major depressive disorder (MDD). There are differences in subcortical brain structures between patients with MDD and healthy controls, but the specific impact of childhood adversity on such structures in MDD remains unclear. Thus, aim of the present study was to investigate whether childhood adversity is associated with subcortical volumes and how it interacts with a diagnosis of MDD and sex. Within the ENIGMA-MDD network, nine university partner sites, which assessed childhood adversity and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with MDD and controls, took part in the current joint mega-analysis. In this largest effort world-wide to identify subcortical brain structure differences related to childhood adversity, 3036 participants were analyzed for subcortical brain volumes using FreeSurfer. A significant interaction was evident between childhood adversity, MDD diagnosis, sex, and region. Increased exposure to childhood adversity was associated with smaller caudate volumes in females independent of MDD. All subcategories of childhood adversity were negatively associated with caudate volumes in females - in particular emotional neglect and physical neglect (independently from age, ICV, imaging site and MDD diagnosis). There was no interaction effect between childhood adversity and MDD diagnosis on subcortical brain volumes. Childhood adversity is one of the contributors to brain structural abnormalities. It is associated with subcortical brain abnormalities that are relevant to psychiatric disorders such as depression.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Cortical Brain Abnormalities in 4474 Individuals With Schizophrenia and 5098 Control Subjects via the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Through Meta Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium
    van Erp, TGM ; Walton, E ; Hibar, DP ; Schmaal, L ; Jiang, W ; Glahn, DC ; Pearlson, GD ; Yao, N ; Fukunaga, M ; Hashimoto, R ; Okada, N ; Yamamori, H ; Bustillo, JR ; Clark, VP ; Agartz, I ; Mueller, BA ; Cahn, W ; de Zwarte, SMC ; Pol, HEH ; Kahn, RS ; Ophoff, RA ; van Haren, NEM ; Andreassen, OA ; Dale, AM ; Nhat, TD ; Gurholt, TP ; Hartberg, CB ; Haukvik, UK ; Jorgensen, KN ; Lagerberg, T ; Melle, I ; Westlye, LT ; Gruber, O ; Kraemer, B ; Richter, A ; Zilles, D ; Calhoun, VD ; Crespo-Facorro, B ; Roiz-Santianez, R ; Tordesillas-Gutierrez, D ; Loughland, C ; Carr, VJ ; Catts, S ; Cropley, VL ; Fullerton, JM ; Green, MJ ; Henskens, FA ; Jablensky, A ; Lenroot, RK ; Mowry, BJ ; Michie, PT ; Pantelis, C ; Quide, Y ; Schall, U ; Scott, RJ ; Cairns, MJ ; Seal, M ; Tooney, PA ; Rasser, PE ; Cooper, G ; Weickert, CS ; Weickert, TW ; Morris, DW ; Hong, E ; Kochunov, P ; Beard, LM ; Gur, RE ; Gur, RC ; Satterthwaite, TD ; Wolf, DH ; Belger, A ; Brown, GG ; Ford, JM ; Macciardi, F ; Mathalon, DH ; O'Leary, DS ; Potkin, SG ; Preda, A ; Voyvodic, J ; Lim, KO ; McEwen, S ; Yang, F ; Tan, Y ; Tan, S ; Wang, Z ; Fan, F ; Chen, J ; Xiang, H ; Tang, S ; Guo, H ; Wan, P ; Wei, D ; Bockholt, HJ ; Ehrlich, S ; Wolthusen, RPF ; King, MD ; Shoemaker, JM ; Sponheim, SR ; De Haan, L ; Koenders, L ; Machielsen, MW ; van Amelsvoort, T ; Veltman, DJ ; Assogna, F ; Banaj, N ; de Rossi, P ; Iorio, M ; Piras, F ; Spalletta, G ; McKenna, PJ ; Pomarol-Clotet, E ; Salvador, R ; Corvin, A ; Donohoe, G ; Kelly, S ; Whelan, CD ; Dickie, EW ; Rotenberg, D ; Voineskos, AN ; Ciufolini, S ; Radua, J ; Dazzan, P ; Murray, R ; Marques, TR ; Simmons, A ; Borgwardt, S ; Egloff, L ; Harrisberger, F ; Riecher-Roessler, A ; Smieskova, R ; Alpert, K ; Wang, L ; Jonsson, EG ; Koops, S ; Sommer, IEC ; Bertolino, A ; Bonvino, A ; Di Giorgio, A ; Neilson, E ; Mayer, AR ; Stephen, JM ; Kwon, JS ; Yun, J-Y ; Cannon, DM ; McDonald, C ; Lebedeva, I ; Tomyshev, AS ; Akhadov, T ; Kaleda, V ; Fatouros-Bergman, H ; Flyckt, L ; Busatto, GF ; Rosa, PGP ; Serpa, MH ; Zanetti, M ; Hoschl, C ; Skoch, A ; Spaniel, F ; Tomecek, D ; Hagenaars, SP ; McIntosh, AM ; Whalley, HC ; Lawrie, SM ; Knoechel, C ; Oertel-Knoechel, V ; Staeblein, M ; Howells, FM ; Stein, DJ ; Temmingh, HS ; Uhlmann, A ; Lopez-Jaramillo, C ; Dima, D ; McMahon, A ; Faskowitz, J ; Gutman, BA ; Jahanshad, N ; Thompson, PM ; Turner, JA (ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2018-11-01)
    BACKGROUND: The profile of cortical neuroanatomical abnormalities in schizophrenia is not fully understood, despite hundreds of published structural brain imaging studies. This study presents the first meta-analysis of cortical thickness and surface area abnormalities in schizophrenia conducted by the ENIGMA (Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta Analysis) Schizophrenia Working Group. METHODS: The study included data from 4474 individuals with schizophrenia (mean age, 32.3 years; range, 11-78 years; 66% male) and 5098 healthy volunteers (mean age, 32.8 years; range, 10-87 years; 53% male) assessed with standardized methods at 39 centers worldwide. RESULTS: Compared with healthy volunteers, individuals with schizophrenia have widespread thinner cortex (left/right hemisphere: Cohen's d = -0.530/-0.516) and smaller surface area (left/right hemisphere: Cohen's d = -0.251/-0.254), with the largest effect sizes for both in frontal and temporal lobe regions. Regional group differences in cortical thickness remained significant when statistically controlling for global cortical thickness, suggesting regional specificity. In contrast, effects for cortical surface area appear global. Case-control, negative, cortical thickness effect sizes were two to three times larger in individuals receiving antipsychotic medication relative to unmedicated individuals. Negative correlations between age and bilateral temporal pole thickness were stronger in individuals with schizophrenia than in healthy volunteers. Regional cortical thickness showed significant negative correlations with normalized medication dose, symptom severity, and duration of illness and positive correlations with age at onset. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the ENIGMA meta-analysis approach can achieve robust findings in clinical neuroscience studies; also, medication effects should be taken into account in future genetic association studies of cortical thickness in schizophrenia.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders Evidence through univariate and multivariate mega-analysis including 6420 participants from the ENIGMA MDD working group
    Opel, N ; Thalamuthu, A ; Milaneschi, Y ; Grotegerd, D ; Flint, C ; Leenings, R ; Goltermann, J ; Richter, M ; Hahn, T ; Woditsch, G ; Berger, K ; Hermesdorf, M ; McIntosh, A ; Whalley, HC ; Harris, MA ; MacMaster, FP ; Walter, H ; Veer, IM ; Frodl, T ; Carballedo, A ; Krug, A ; Nenadic, I ; Kircher, T ; Aleman, A ; Groenewold, NA ; Stein, DJ ; Soares, JC ; Zunta-Soares, GB ; Mwangi, B ; Wu, M-J ; Walter, M ; Li, M ; Harrison, BJ ; Davey, CG ; Cullen, KR ; Klimes-Dougan, B ; Mueller, BA ; Saemann, PG ; Penninx, B ; Nawijn, L ; Veltman, DJ ; Aftanas, L ; Brak, I ; Filimonova, EA ; Osipov, EA ; Reneman, L ; Schrantee, A ; Grabe, HJ ; Van der Auwera, S ; Wittfeld, K ; Hosten, N ; Voelzke, H ; Sim, K ; Gotlib, IH ; Sacchet, MD ; Lagopoulos, J ; Hatton, SN ; Hickie, I ; Pozzi, E ; Thompson, PM ; Jahanshad, N ; Schmaal, L ; Baune, BT ; Dannlowski, U (SPRINGERNATURE, 2021-09)
    Emerging evidence suggests that obesity impacts brain physiology at multiple levels. Here we aimed to clarify the relationship between obesity and brain structure using structural MRI (n = 6420) and genetic data (n = 3907) from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) working group. Obesity (BMI > 30) was significantly associated with cortical and subcortical abnormalities in both mass-univariate and multivariate pattern recognition analyses independent of MDD diagnosis. The most pronounced effects were found for associations between obesity and lower temporo-frontal cortical thickness (maximum Cohen´s d (left fusiform gyrus) = -0.33). The observed regional distribution and effect size of cortical thickness reductions in obesity revealed considerable similarities with corresponding patterns of lower cortical thickness in previously published studies of neuropsychiatric disorders. A higher polygenic risk score for obesity significantly correlated with lower occipital surface area. In addition, a significant age-by-obesity interaction on cortical thickness emerged driven by lower thickness in older participants. Our findings suggest a neurobiological interaction between obesity and brain structure under physiological and pathological brain conditions.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders (May, 2020, 10.1038/s41380-020-0774-9)
    Opel, N ; Thalamuthu, A ; Milaneschi, Y ; Grotegerd, D ; Flint, C ; Leenings, R ; Goltermann, J ; Richter, M ; Hahn, T ; Woditsch, G ; Berger, K ; Hermesdorf, M ; McIntosh, A ; Whalley, HC ; Harris, MA ; MacMaster, FP ; Walter, H ; Veer, IM ; Frodl, T ; Carballedo, A ; Krug, A ; Nenadic, I ; Kircher, T ; Aleman, A ; Groenewold, NA ; Stein, DJ ; Soares, JC ; Zunta-Soares, GB ; Mwangi, B ; Wu, M-J ; Walter, M ; Li, M ; Harrison, BJ ; Davey, CG ; Cullen, KR ; Klimes-Dougan, B ; Mueller, BA ; Samann, PG ; Penninx, B ; Nawijn, L ; Veltman, DJ ; Aftanas, L ; Brak, IV ; Filimonova, EA ; Osipov, EA ; Reneman, L ; Schrantee, A ; Grabe, HJ ; van der Auwera, S ; Wittfeld, K ; Hosten, N ; Volzke, H ; Sim, K ; Gotlib, IH ; Sacchet, MD ; Lagopoulos, J ; Hatton, SN ; Hickie, I ; Pozzi, E ; Thompson, PM ; Jahanshad, N ; Schmaal, L ; Baune, BT ; Dannlowski, U (SPRINGERNATURE, 2021-12)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Brain structural correlates of insomnia severity in 1053 individuals with major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA MDD working group
    Leerssen, J ; Blanken, TF ; Pozzi, E ; Jahanshad, N ; Aftanas, L ; Andreassen, OA ; Baune, BT ; Ching, CRK ; Dannlowski, U ; Frodl, T ; Godlewska, BR ; Gotlib, IH ; Grotegerd, D ; Gruber, O ; Hatton, SN ; Hickie, IB ; Jaworska, N ; Kircher, T ; Krug, A ; Lagopoulos, J ; Li, M ; MacMaster, FP ; McIntosh, AM ; Mwangi, B ; Osipov, E ; Portella, MJ ; Sacchet, MD ; Samann, PG ; Simulionyte, E ; Soares, JC ; Walter, M ; Whalley, HC ; Veltman, DJ ; Thompson, PM ; Schmaal, L ; Van Someren, EJW (WILEY, 2020-09)
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders
    Patel, Y ; Parker, N ; Shin, J ; Howard, D ; French, L ; Thomopoulos, SI ; Pozzi, E ; Abe, Y ; Abe, C ; Anticevic, A ; Alda, M ; Aleman, A ; Alloza, C ; Alonso-Lana, S ; Ameis, SH ; Anagnostou, E ; McIntosh, AA ; Arango, C ; Arnold, PD ; Asherson, P ; Assogna, F ; Auzias, G ; Ayesa-Arriola, R ; Bakker, G ; Banaj, N ; Banaschewski, T ; Bandeira, CE ; Baranov, A ; Bargallo, N ; Bau, CHD ; Baumeister, S ; Baune, BT ; Bellgrove, MA ; Benedetti, F ; Bertolino, A ; Boedhoe, PSW ; Boks, M ; Bollettini, I ; del Mar Bonnin, C ; Borgers, T ; Borgwardt, S ; Brandeis, D ; Brennan, BP ; Bruggemann, JM ; Bulow, R ; Busatto, GF ; Calderoni, S ; Calhoun, VD ; Calvo, R ; Canales-Rodriguez, EJ ; Cannon, DM ; Carr, VJ ; Cascella, N ; Cercignani, M ; Chaim-Avancini, TM ; Christakou, A ; Coghill, D ; Conzelmann, A ; Crespo-Facorro, B ; Cubillo, AI ; Cullen, KR ; Cupertino, RB ; Daly, E ; Dannlowski, U ; Davey, CG ; Denys, D ; Deruelle, C ; Di Giorgio, A ; Dickie, EW ; Dima, D ; Dohm, K ; Ehrlich, S ; Ely, BA ; Erwin-Grabner, T ; Ethofer, T ; Fair, DA ; Fallgatter, AJ ; Faraone, SV ; Fatjo-Vilas, M ; Fedor, JM ; Fitzgerald, KD ; Ford, JM ; Frodl, T ; Fu, CHY ; Fullerton, JM ; Gabel, MC ; Glahn, DC ; Roberts, G ; Gogberashvili, T ; Goikolea, JM ; Gotlib, IH ; Goya-Maldonado, R ; Grabe, HJ ; Green, MJ ; Grevet, EH ; Groenewold, NA ; Grotegerd, D ; Gruber, O ; Gruner, P ; Guerrero-Pedraza, A ; Gur, RE ; Gur, RC ; Haar, S ; Haarman, BCM ; Haavik, J ; Hahn, T ; Hajek, T ; Harrison, BJ ; Harrison, NA ; Hartman, CA ; Whalley, HC ; Heslenfeld, DJ ; Hibar, DP ; Hilland, E ; Hirano, Y ; Ho, TC ; Hoekstra, PJ ; Hoekstra, L ; Hohmann, S ; Hong, LE ; Hoschl, C ; Hovik, MF ; Howells, FM ; Nenadic, I ; Jalbrzikowski, M ; James, AC ; Janssen, J ; Jaspers-Fayer, F ; Xu, J ; Jonassen, R ; Karkashadze, G ; King, JA ; Kircher, T ; Kirschner, M ; Koch, K ; Kochunov, P ; Kohls, G ; Konrad, K ; Kramer, B ; Krug, A ; Kuntsi, J ; Kwon, JS ; Landen, M ; Landro, NI ; Lazaro, L ; Lebedeva, IS ; Leehr, EJ ; Lera-Miguel, S ; Lesch, K-P ; Lochner, C ; Louza, MR ; Luna, B ; Lundervold, AJ ; MacMaster, FP ; Maglanoc, LA ; Malpas, CB ; Portella, MJ ; Marsh, R ; Martyn, FM ; Mataix-Cols, D ; Mathalon, DH ; McCarthy, H ; McDonald, C ; McPhilemy, G ; Meinert, S ; Menchon, JM ; Minuzzi, L ; Mitchell, PB ; Moreno, C ; Morgado, P ; Muratori, F ; Murphy, CM ; Murphy, D ; Mwangi, B ; Nabulsi, L ; Nakagawa, A ; Nakamae, T ; Namazova, L ; Narayanaswamy, J ; Jahanshad, N ; Nguyen, DD ; Nicolau, R ; O'Gorman Tuura, RL ; O'Hearn, K ; Oosterlaan, J ; Opel, N ; Ophoff, RA ; Oranje, B ; Garcia de la Foz, VO ; Overs, BJ ; Paloyelis, Y ; Pantelis, C ; Parellada, M ; Pauli, P ; Pico-Perez, M ; Picon, FA ; Piras, F ; Piras, F ; Plessen, KJ ; Pomarol-Clotet, E ; Preda, A ; Puig, O ; Quide, Y ; Radua, J ; Ramos-Quiroga, JA ; Rasser, PE ; Rauer, L ; Reddy, J ; Redlich, R ; Reif, A ; Reneman, L ; Repple, J ; Retico, A ; Richarte, V ; Richter, A ; Rosa, PGP ; Rubia, KK ; Hashimoto, R ; Sacchet, MD ; Salvador, R ; Santonja, J ; Sarink, K ; Sarro, S ; Satterthwaite, TD ; Sawa, A ; Schall, U ; Schofield, PR ; Schrantee, A ; Seitz, J ; Serpa, MH ; Setien-Suero, E ; Shaw, P ; Shook, D ; Silk, TJ ; Sim, K ; Simon, S ; Simpson, HB ; Singh, A ; Skoch, A ; Skokauskas, N ; Soares, JC ; Soreni, N ; Soriano-Mas, C ; Spalletta, G ; Spaniel, F ; Lawrie, SM ; Stern, ER ; Stewart, SE ; Takayanagi, Y ; Temmingh, HS ; Tolin, DF ; Tomecek, D ; Tordesillas-Gutierrez, D ; Tosetti, M ; Uhlmann, A ; van Amelsvoort, T ; van der Wee, NJA ; van der Werff, SJA ; van Haren, NEM ; van Wingen, GA ; Vance, A ; Vazquez-Bourgon, J ; Vecchio, D ; Venkatasubramanian, G ; Vieta, E ; Vilarroya, O ; Vives-Gilabert, Y ; Voineskos, AN ; Volzke, H ; von Polier, GG ; Walton, E ; Weickert, TW ; Weickert, CS ; Weideman, AS ; Wittfeld, K ; Wolf, DH ; Wu, M-J ; Yang, TT ; Yang, K ; Yoncheva, Y ; Yun, J-Y ; Cheng, Y ; Zanetti, MV ; Ziegler, GC ; Franke, B ; Hoogman, M ; Buitelaar, JK ; van Rooij, D ; Andreassen, OA ; Ching, CRK ; Veltman, DJ ; Schmaal, L ; Stein, DJ ; van den Heuvel, OA ; Turner, JA ; van Erp, TGM ; Pausova, Z ; Thompson, PM ; Paus, T (AMER MEDICAL ASSOC, 2021-01)
    IMPORTANCE: Large-scale neuroimaging studies have revealed group differences in cortical thickness across many psychiatric disorders. The underlying neurobiology behind these differences is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To determine neurobiologic correlates of group differences in cortical thickness between cases and controls in 6 disorders: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and schizophrenia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Profiles of group differences in cortical thickness between cases and controls were generated using T1-weighted magnetic resonance images. Similarity between interregional profiles of cell-specific gene expression and those in the group differences in cortical thickness were investigated in each disorder. Next, principal component analysis was used to reveal a shared profile of group difference in thickness across the disorders. Analysis for gene coexpression, clustering, and enrichment for genes associated with these disorders were conducted. Data analysis was conducted between June and December 2019. The analysis included 145 cohorts across 6 psychiatric disorders drawn from the ENIGMA consortium. The numbers of cases and controls in each of the 6 disorders were as follows: ADHD: 1814 and 1602; ASD: 1748 and 1770; BD: 1547 and 3405; MDD: 2658 and 3572; OCD: 2266 and 2007; and schizophrenia: 2688 and 3244. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Interregional profiles of group difference in cortical thickness between cases and controls. RESULTS: A total of 12 721 cases and 15 600 controls, ranging from ages 2 to 89 years, were included in this study. Interregional profiles of group differences in cortical thickness for each of the 6 psychiatric disorders were associated with profiles of gene expression specific to pyramidal (CA1) cells, astrocytes (except for BD), and microglia (except for OCD); collectively, gene-expression profiles of the 3 cell types explain between 25% and 54% of variance in interregional profiles of group differences in cortical thickness. Principal component analysis revealed a shared profile of difference in cortical thickness across the 6 disorders (48% variance explained); interregional profile of this principal component 1 was associated with that of the pyramidal-cell gene expression (explaining 56% of interregional variation). Coexpression analyses of these genes revealed 2 clusters: (1) a prenatal cluster enriched with genes involved in neurodevelopmental (axon guidance) processes and (2) a postnatal cluster enriched with genes involved in synaptic activity and plasticity-related processes. These clusters were enriched with genes associated with all 6 psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, shared neurobiologic processes were associated with differences in cortical thickness across multiple psychiatric disorders. These processes implicate a common role of prenatal development and postnatal functioning of the cerebral cortex in these disorders.