Anatomy and Neuroscience - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemMuscarinic receptor 1 allosteric modulators stimulate colorectal emptying in dog, mouse and rat and resolve constipation(WILEY, 2019-11)BACKGROUND: Because M1 muscarinic receptors are expressed by enteric neurons, we investigated whether positive allosteric modulators of these receptors (M1PAMs) would enhance colorectal propulsion and defecation in dogs, mice, and rats. METHODS: The potencies of the M1PAMs, T662 or T523, were investigated using M1 receptor-expressing CHO cells. Effectiveness of M1PAMs on defecation was investigated by oral administration in mice and rats, by recording propulsive contractions in anaesthetized rats and by recording high amplitude propagating contractions in dogs. KEY RESULTS: PAM EC50 values in M1 receptor-expressing CHO cells were 0.7-1.8 nmol/L for T662 and 8-10 nmol/L for T523. The compounds had 1000-fold lower potencies as agonists. In anesthetized rats, both compounds elicited propulsive colorectal contractions, and in dogs, mice, and rats, oral administration increased fecal output. No adverse effects were observed in conscious animals. M1PAMs triggered propagated high amplitude contractions and caused defecation in dogs. Nerve-mediated contractions were enhanced in the isolated mouse colon. M1PAMs were equi-effective in rats with or without the pelvic nerves being severed. In two models of constipation in mice, opiate-induced constipation and constipation of aging, defecation was induced and constipation was reversed. CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: M1PAMs act at targets sites in the colorectum to enhance colorectal propulsion. They are effective across species, and they reverse experimentally induced constipation. Previous studies have shown that they are safe in human. Because they provide an enhancement of physiological control rather than being direct agonists, they are predicted to provide effective treatment for constipation.
-
ItemDopamine and ghrelin receptor co-expression and interaction in the spinal defecation centers(WILEY, 2021-05)BACKGROUND: Dopamine receptor 2 (DRD2) and ghrelin receptor (GHSR1a) agonists both stimulate defecation by actions at the lumbosacral defecation center. Dopamine is in nerve terminals surrounding autonomic neurons of the defecation center, whereas ghrelin is not present in the spinal cord. Dopamine at D2 receptors generally inhibits neurons, but at the defecation center, its effect is excitatory. METHODS: In vivo recording of defecation and colorectal propulsion was used to investigate interaction between DRD2 and GHSR1a. Localization studies were used to determine sites of receptor expression in rat and human spinal cord. KEY RESULTS: Dopamine, and the DRD2 agonist, quinpirole, directly applied to the lumbosacral cord, caused defecation. The effect of intrathecal dopamine was inhibited by the GHSR1a antagonist, YIL781, given systemically, but YIL781 was not an antagonist at DRD2. The DRD2 agonist, pramipexole, administered systemically caused colorectal propulsion that was prevented when the pelvic nerves were cut. Drd2 and Ghsr were expressed together in autonomic preganglionic neurons at the level of the defecation centers in rat and human. Behaviorally induced defecation (caused by water avoidance stress) was reduced by the DRD2 antagonist, sulpiride. We had previously shown it is reduced by YIL781. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Our observations imply that dopamine is a transmitter of the defecation pathways whose actions are exerted through interacting dopamine (D2) and ghrelin receptors on lumbosacral autonomic neurons that project to the colorectum. The results explain the excitation by dopamine agonists and the conservation of GHSR1a in the absence of ghrelin.
-
ItemEvidence that central pathways that mediate defecation utilize ghrelin receptors but do not require endogenous ghrelin(WILEY, 2017-08)In laboratory animals and in human, centrally penetrant ghrelin receptor agonists, given systemically or orally, cause defecation. Animal studies show that the effect is due to activation of ghrelin receptors in the spinal lumbosacral defecation centers. However, it is not known whether there is a physiological role of ghrelin or the ghrelin receptor in the control of defecation. Using immunohistochemistry and immunoassay, we detected and measured ghrelin in the stomach, but were unable to detect ghrelin by either method in the lumbosacral spinal cord, or other regions of the CNS In rats in which the thoracic spinal cord was transected 5 weeks before, the effects of a ghrelin agonist on colorectal propulsion were significantly enhanced, but defecation caused by water avoidance stress (WAS) was reduced. In knockout rats that expressed no ghrelin and in wild-type rats, WAS-induced defecation was reduced by a ghrelin receptor antagonist, to similar extents. We conclude that the ghrelin receptors of the lumbosacral defecation centers have a physiological role in the control of defecation, but that their role is not dependent on ghrelin. This implies that a transmitter other than ghrelin engages the ghrelin receptor or a ghrelin receptor complex.