Anatomy and Neuroscience - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Hospitalisation, morbidity and outcomes associated with respiratory syncytial virus compared with influenza in adults of all ages
    Leaver, B ; Smith, B ; Irving, L ; Johnson, D ; Tong, S (WILEY, 2022-05)
    BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is understood to be a cause of significant disease in older adults and children. Further analysis of RSV in younger adults may reveal further insight into its role as an important pathogen in all age groups. METHODS: We identified, through laboratory data, adults who tested positive for either influenza or RSV between January 2017 and June 2019 at a single Australian hospital. We compared baseline demographics, testing patterns, hospitalisations and outcomes between these groups. RESULTS: Of 1128 influenza and 193 RSV patients, the RSV cohort was older (mean age 54.7 vs. 64.9, p < 0.001) and was more comorbid as determined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.4 vs. 3.2, p < 0.001). For influenza hospitalisations, the majority admitted were aged under 65 which was not the case for RSV (61.8% vs. 45.6%, p < 0.001). Testing occurred later in RSV hospitalisations as measured by the proportion tested in the emergency department (ED) (80.3% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.001), and this was strongly associated with differences in presenting phenotype (the presence of fever). RSV was the biggest predictor of 6-month representation, with age and comorbidities predicting this less strongly. CONCLUSION: RSV is a significant contributor to morbidity and hospitalisation, sometimes outweighing that of influenza, and is not limited to elderly cohorts. Understanding key differences in the clinical syndrome and consequent testing paradigms may allow better detection and potentially treatment of RSV to reduce individual morbidity and health system burden. This growing area of research helps quantify the need for directed therapies for RSV.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Commencement of cardioselective beta-blockers during hospitalisation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Neef, PA ; Burrell, LM ; McDonald, CF ; Irving, LB ; Johnson, DF ; Steinfort, DP (WILEY, 2017-09)
    BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and co-morbid cardiovascular disease, emerging evidence suggests a benefit in commencing cardioselective beta-blockers. AIM: Our objective was to determine the safety of beta-blocker commencement during hospitalisation for acute exacerbation of COPD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 1071 patients hospitalised for acute exacerbation of COPD was conducted across two tertiary hospitals over a 12-month period. We identified 36 patients in whom beta-blocker therapy was commenced during admission. The primary outcome of the study was to assess cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events related to the commencement of beta-blocker therapy. RESULTS: The most common indications for beta-blockers were atrial fibrillation (53%) and acute coronary syndrome (36%). Metoprolol was the most commonly prescribed beta-blocker (75%). No patients suffered clinically significant declines of respiratory function following the commencement of a beta-blocker, including worsening respiratory symptoms, oxygen, bronchodilator or ventilation requirements. These results were demonstrable in patients with reversible airways disease and advanced COPD. Only one patient (2.8%) experienced symptomatic hypotension after 48 h of therapy. CONCLUSION: The commencement of cardioselective beta-blockers during acute exacerbations of COPD appears to be well-tolerated.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Low rates of eligibility for lung cancer screening in patients undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography
    Lyne, C ; Zaw, S ; King, B ; See, K ; Manners, D ; Al-Kaisey, A ; Joshi, S ; Farouque, O ; Irving, L ; Johnson, D ; Steinfort, D (WILEY, 2018-10)
    Incidental findings, including pulmonary nodules, on computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) are common. Previous authors have suggested CTCA could allow opportunistic screening for lung cancer, though the lung cancer risk profile of this patient group has not previously been established. Smoking histories of 229 patients undergoing CTCA at two tertiary hospitals were reviewed and only 25% were current or former smokers aged 55-80 years old. Less than half of this group were eligible for screening based on the PLCOm2012 risk model. We conclude that routine screening in the form of full thoracic field imaging, of individuals undergoing CTCA is not appropriate as it would likely result in net harm.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Outcomes following resection of non-small cell lung cancer in octogenarians
    Vazirani, J ; Moraes, J ; Barnett, S ; Johnson, DF ; Knight, S ; Miller, A ; Wright, G ; Alam, NZ ; Conron, M ; Irving, LB ; Antippa, P ; Steinfort, DP (WILEY, 2018-12)
    BACKGROUND: The treatment of choice for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgical resection. Little is known about the short- and long-term outcomes among very elderly patients. We sought to determine predictors of short- and long-term survival among octogenarians undergoing curative-intent resection for NSCLC in Victoria, Australia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from all patients aged ≥80 years who underwent curative-intent resection for NSCLC over 12 years (January 2005-December 2016) across five tertiary centres. We examined effect of age, stage of disease, extent of surgery and lung function on short- and long-term survival. RESULTS: Two hundred patients aged ≥80 years underwent curative-intent resections. Mortality at 30 and 120 days was 2.9% and 5.9%, respectively. Increased early mortality was observed among those ≥83 years, at 30 days (6.8% versus 0.8%, P = 0.044) and 120 days (12.2% versus 2.3%, P = 0.0096). Early mortality was highest among patients ≥83 years requiring lobectomy, compared to sub-lobar resection at 120 days (17% versus 3.8%, P = 0.019). Long-term survival was predicted by age and stage of disease. Among patients with Stage I disease aged <83 years, lobectomy was associated with superior 5-year survival, compared to sub-lobar resection (83% versus 61%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In carefully selected elderly patients undergoing curative-intent resection of early stage NSCLC, both short- and long-term outcomes appear consistent with younger historical cohorts. Early mortality was associated with lobectomy in those with advanced age. Older patients undergoing lobectomy appeared to be at highest risk for early mortality, while younger patients with Stage I disease undergoing at least lobectomy appear to have the best long-term survival.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Starting beta-blockers during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Author reply
    Neef, PA ; Burrell, LM ; McDonald, CF ; Irving, LB ; Johnson, DF ; Steinfort, DP (WILEY, 2018-02)
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Pandemic printing: a novel 3D-printed swab for detecting SARS-CoV-2
    Williams, E ; Bond, K ; Isles, N ; Chong, B ; Johnson, D ; Druce, J ; Hoang, T ; Ballard, SA ; Hall, V ; Muhi, S ; Buising, KL ; Lim, S ; Strugnell, D ; Catton, M ; Irving, LB ; Howden, BP ; Bert, E ; Williamson, DA (WILEY, 2020-09)
    OBJECTIVES: To design and evaluate 3D-printed nasal swabs for collection of samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing. DESIGN: An iterative design process was employed. Laboratory evaluation included in vitro assessment of mock nasopharyngeal samples spiked with two different concentrations of gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2. A prospective clinical study compared SARS-CoV-2 and human cellular material recovery by 3D-printed swabs and standard nasopharyngeal swabs. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Royal Melbourne Hospital, May 2020. Participants in the clinical evaluation were 50 hospital staff members attending a COVID-19 screening clinic and two inpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. INTERVENTION: In the clinical evaluation, a flocked nasopharyngeal swab sample was collected with the Copan ESwab and a mid-nasal sample from the other nostril was collected with the 3D-printed swab. RESULTS: In the laboratory evaluation, qualitative agreement with regard to SARS-CoV-2 detection in mock samples collected with 3D-printed swabs and two standard swabs was complete. In the clinical evaluation, qualitative agreement with regard to RNase P detection (a surrogate measure of adequate collection of human cellular material) in samples collected from 50 hospital staff members with standard and 3D-printed swabs was complete. Qualitative agreement with regard to SARS-CoV-2 detection in three pairs of 3D-printed mid-nasal and standard swab samples from two inpatients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 was also complete. CONCLUSIONS: Using 3D-printed swabs to collect nasal samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing is feasible, acceptable to patients and health carers, and convenient.