Anatomy and Neuroscience - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableAerosol generation related to respiratory interventions and the effectiveness of a personal ventilation hood.(College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, 2020-09)OBJECTIVE: To quantify aerosol generation from respiratory interventions and the effectiveness of their removal by a personal ventilation hood. DESIGN AND SETTING: Determination of the aerosol particle generation (in a single, healthy volunteer in a clean room) associated with breathing, speaking, wet coughing, oxygen (O2) 15 L/min via face mask, O2 60 L/min via nasal prongs, bilevel non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (BiPAP) and nebulisation with O2 10 L/min. INTERVENTIONS: Aerosol generation was measured with two particle sizer and counter devices, focusing on aerosols 0.5-5 μm (human-generated aerosols), with and without the hood. An increase from baseline of less than 0.3 particles per mL was considered a low level of generation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons of aerosol generation between different respiratory interventions. Effectiveness of aerosol reduction by a personal ventilation hood. RESULTS: Results for the 0.5-5 μm aerosol range. Quiet breathing and talking demonstrated very low increase in aerosols (< 0.1 particles/mL). Aerosol generation was low for wet coughing (0.1 particles/mL), O2 15 L/min via face mask (0.18 particles/mL), and high flow nasal O2 60 L/min (0.24 particles/mL). Non-invasive ventilation generated moderate aerosols (29.7 particles/mL) and nebulisation very high aerosols (1086 particles/mL); the personal ventilation hood reduced the aerosol counts by 98% to 0.5 particles/mL and 8.9 particles/mL respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this human volunteer study, the administration of O2 15 L/min by face mask and 60 L/min nasal therapy did not increase aerosol generation beyond low levels. Non-invasive ventilation caused moderate aerosol generation and nebulisation therapy very high aerosol generation. The personal ventilation hood reduced the aerosol counts by at least 98%.
-
ItemEffectiveness of portable air filtration on reducing indoor aerosol transmission: preclinical observational trials(W B SAUNDERS CO LTD, 2022-01)BACKGROUND: While the range of possible transmission pathways of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 in various settings has been investigated thoroughly, most authorities have recently acknowledged the role of aerosol spread in its transmission, especially in indoor environments where ventilation is poor. Engineering controls are needed to mitigate aerosol transmission in high-risk settings including hospital wards, classrooms and offices. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of aerosol filtration by portable air cleaning devices with high-efficiency particulate air filters used in addition to a standard building heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system. METHODS: Test rooms, including a single-bed hospital room, were filled with test aerosol to simulate aerosol movement. Aerosol counts were measured over time with various portable air cleaning devices and room ventilation systems to quantify the overall aerosol clearance rate. FINDINGS: Portable air cleaning devices were very effective for removal of aerosols. The aerosols were cleared five times faster in a small control room with portable air cleaning devices than in the room with HVAC alone. The single-bed hospital room had an excellent ventilation rate (∼14 air changes per hour) and cleared the aerosols in 20 min. However, with the addition of two air cleaning devices, the clearance time was three times faster. CONCLUSIONS: Inexpensive portable air cleaning devices should be considered for small and enclosed spaces in healthcare settings, such as inpatient rooms and personal protective equipment donning/doffing stations. Portable air cleaning devices are particularly important where there is limited ability to reduce aerosol transmission with building HVAC ventilation.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableAerosol generation related to respiratory interventions and the effectiveness of a personal ventilation hood.(College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, 2020-09)OBJECTIVE: To quantify aerosol generation from respiratory interventions and the effectiveness of their removal by a personal ventilation hood. DESIGN AND SETTING: Determination of the aerosol particle generation (in a single, healthy volunteer in a clean room) associated with breathing, speaking, wet coughing, oxygen (O2) 15 L/min via face mask, O2 60 L/min via nasal prongs, bilevel non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (BiPAP) and nebulisation with O2 10 L/min. INTERVENTIONS: Aerosol generation was measured with two particle sizer and counter devices, focusing on aerosols 0.5-5 μm (human-generated aerosols), with and without the hood. An increase from baseline of less than 0.3 particles per mL was considered a low level of generation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons of aerosol generation between different respiratory interventions. Effectiveness of aerosol reduction by a personal ventilation hood. RESULTS: Results for the 0.5-5 μm aerosol range. Quiet breathing and talking demonstrated very low increase in aerosols (< 0.1 particles/mL). Aerosol generation was low for wet coughing (0.1 particles/mL), O2 15 L/min via face mask (0.18 particles/mL), and high flow nasal O2 60 L/min (0.24 particles/mL). Non-invasive ventilation generated moderate aerosols (29.7 particles/mL) and nebulisation very high aerosols (1086 particles/mL); the personal ventilation hood reduced the aerosol counts by 98% to 0.5 particles/mL and 8.9 particles/mL respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this human volunteer study, the administration of O2 15 L/min by face mask and 60 L/min nasal therapy did not increase aerosol generation beyond low levels. Non-invasive ventilation caused moderate aerosol generation and nebulisation therapy very high aerosol generation. The personal ventilation hood reduced the aerosol counts by at least 98%.