Medicine (St Vincent's) - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Australia and New Zealand consensus position statement: use of COVID-19 therapeutics in patients with haematological malignancies
    Campbell, A ; Teh, B ; Mulligan, S ; Ross, DM ; Weinkove, R ; Gilroy, N ; Gangatharan, S ; Prince, HM ; Szer, J ; Trotman, J ; Lane, S ; Dickinson, M ; Quach, H ; Enjeti, AK ; Ku, M ; Gregory, G ; Hapgood, G ; Ho, PJ ; Cochrane, T ; Cheah, C ; Greenwood, M ; Latimer, M ; Berkahn, L ; Wight, J ; Armytage, T ; Diamond, P ; Tam, CS ; Hamad, N (Wiley, 2023-02)
    Despite widespread vaccination rates, we are living with high transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2. Although overall hospitalisation rates are falling, the risk of serious infection remains high for patients who are immunocompromised because of haematological malignancies. In light of the ongoing pandemic and the development of multiple agents for treatment, representatives from the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand and infectious diseases specialists have collaborated on this consensus position statement regarding COVID-19 management in patients with haematological disorders. It is our recommendation that both patients with haematological malignancies and treating specialists be educated regarding the preventive and treatment options available and that patients continue to receive adequate vaccinations, keeping in mind the suboptimal vaccine responses that occur in haematology patients, in particular, those with B-cell malignancies and on B-cell-targeting or depleting therapy. Patients with haematological malignancies should receive treatment for COVID-19 in accordance with the severity of their symptoms, but even mild infections should prompt early treatment with antiviral agents. The issue of de-isolation following COVID-19 infection and optimal time to treatment for haematological malignancies is discussed but remains an area with evolving data. This position statement is to be used in conjunction with advice from infectious disease, respiratory and intensive care specialists, and current guidelines from the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce and the New Zealand Ministry of Health and Cancer Agency Te Aho o Te Kahu COVID-19 Guidelines.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    COVID-19 vaccination in haematology patients: an Australian and New Zealand consensus position statement
    McCaughan, G ; Di Ciaccio, P ; Ananda-Rajah, M ; Gilroy, N ; MacIntyre, R ; Teh, B ; Weinkove, R ; Curnow, J ; Szer, J ; Enjeti, AK ; Ross, DM ; Mulligan, S ; Trotman, J ; Dickinson, M ; Quach, H ; Choi, P ; Polizzotto, MN ; Tam, CS ; Ho, PJ ; Ku, M ; Gregory, G ; Gangatharan, S ; Hapgood, G ; Cochrane, T ; Cheah, C ; Gibbs, S ; Wei, A ; Johnston, A ; Greenwood, M ; Prince, HM ; Latimer, M ; Berkahn, L ; Wight, J ; Armytage, T ; Hamad, N (WILEY, 2021-05)
    Australia and New Zealand have achieved excellent community control of COVID-19 infection. In light of the imminent COVID-19 vaccination roll out in both countries, representatives from the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand and infectious diseases specialists have collaborated on this consensus position statement regarding COVID-19 vaccination in patients with haematological disorders. It is our recommendation that patients with haematological malignancies, and some benign haematological disorders, should have expedited access to high-efficacy COVID-19 vaccines, given that these patients are at high risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 infection. Vaccination should not replace other public health measures in these patients, given that the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination, specifically in patients with haematological malignancies, is not known. Given the limited available data, prospective collection of safety and efficacy data of COVID-19 vaccination in this patient group is a priority.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Low rates of invasive fungal disease in patients with multiple myeloma managed with new generation therapies: Results from a multi-centre cohort study
    Lim, C ; Sinha, P ; Harrison, SJ ; Quach, H ; Slavin, MA ; Teh, BW (WILEY, 2021-01)
    INTRODUCTION: A multi-centre study to determine the outcomes and risks for invasive fungal disease (IFD) in myeloma (MM) patients treated with second-generation immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies was conducted. METHODS: Clinical and microbiology records were reviewed to capture patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment, IFD episodes and outcomes. Categorical and continuous variables between patients with IFD and without IFD were compared using chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney rank sum test, respectively, with P-value < .05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five out of 148 (3.4%) MM patients were diagnosed with five episodes of IFI: 3 were proven, 1 probable and 1 possible. Median time from commencement of new generation therapy to IFD diagnosis was 4.0 months (Interquartile range [IQR]: 3.4-5.7). In patients with IFD, median cumulative steroid dose over 60 days was 1119 mg (IQR: 1066-1333 mg). None of the patients with IFD had prolonged neutropenia (neutrophil count < 0.5 × 109 /L for more than 10 days). Common sites of infection were the respiratory tract (40.0%) and bloodstream (40.0%). Cryptococcus neoformans (n = 2) and Candida krusei (n = 1) were the fungal pathogens isolated in the three proven cases. 30-day mortality rate was 40.0%. Patients with IFD were younger (median 58 versus 68 years, P = .52) and treated with more lines of therapy (median 5 vs 3, P = .04). CONCLUSION: IFD rate is low in heavily treated MM patients treated with second-generation therapy including monoclonal antibodies. Patients do not appear to have traditional risk factors such as prolonged neutropenia.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Successful identification of predictive profiles for infection utilising systems-level immune analysis: a pilot study in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
    Doerflinger, M ; Garnham, AL ; Freytag, S ; Harrison, SJ ; Prince, HM ; Quach, H ; Slavin, MA ; Pellegrini, M ; Teh, BW (WILEY, 2021)
    OBJECTIVES: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at increased risk for infection. Clinical assessment of infection risk is increasingly challenging in the era of immune-based therapy. A pilot systems-level immune analysis study to identify predictive markers for infection was conducted. METHODS: Patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM (RRMM) who participated in a treatment trial of lenalidomide and dexamethasone were evaluated. Data on patient demographics, disease and episodes of infection were extracted from clinical records. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected at defined intervals were analysed, with or without mitogen re-stimulation, using RNA sequencing and mass cytometry (CyTOF). CyTOF-derived cell subsets and RNAseq gene expression profiles were compared between patients that did and did not develop infection to identify immune signatures that predict infection over a 3-month period. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients participated in the original treatment trial, and we were able to access samples from 17 RRMM patients for further evaluation in our study. Nearly half the patients developed an infection (8/17) within 3 months of sample collection. Infections were mostly clinically diagnosed (62.5%), and the majority involved the respiratory tract (87.5%). We did not detect phenotypic or numerical differences in immune cell populations between patients that did and did not develop infections. Transcriptional profiling of stimulated PBMCs revealed distinct Th2 immune pathway signatures in patients that developed infection. CONCLUSION: Immune cell counts were not useful predictors of infection risk. Functional assessment of stimulated PBMCs has identified potential immune profiles that may predict future infection risk in patients with RRMM.