Psychiatry - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 1 of 1
-
ItemThe neural basis of threat and safety reversal learning in healthy subjects and patients with Social Anxiety Disorder( 2021)Responding flexibly to changing sources of threat and safety is critical to the adaptive regulation of emotions, including fear. Anxiety disorders, including social anxiety disorder (SAD), have been linked to maladaptive forms of fear regulation. At a neural systems level, such flexibility is thought to rely on an extended neural circuitry involving the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortices (vmPFC), although precisely how this occurs remains unclear. Furthermore, few studies have examined this in young, unmedicated SAD patients. To address this, this thesis used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and autonomic and subjective measures during a threat and safety reversal learning task, in three studies. Study 1 examined the neural correlates of threat and safety reversal learning and their associations with individual differences in anxious responding in a large sample of healthy adolescents and young adults (N=94; 21.31 years). Overall, participants demonstrated successful threat and safety reversal learning. At a whole-brain level, threat reversal was associated with significant activation of the bilateral anterior insular cortex and dACC, in particular its rostral subregion. Conversely, safety reversal led to significant activation of the anterior vmPFC, together with posterior mid-line regions. Study 2 aimed to characterise the neural, subjective, and autonomic correlates of reversal learning in patients with SAD (N=41; 19.85 years), and compare them to matched patients with major depressive disorder (N=19; 19.42 years) and to healthy controls (N=60; 20.3 years). No significant differences were observed between groups at either a neural, subjective, or autonomic level. Threat learning elicits robust changes across multiple affective domains. It has been argued that the underlying causes of such changes may be dissociable at a neural level, but there is currently limited evidence to support this notion. To address this, Study 3 examined the neural mediators of trial-by-trial skin conductance responses (SCR), and subjective reports of anxious arousal and valence in participants performing the threat and safety reversal learning task during ultra-high field fMRI (N=27; 21.93 years). Our results suggest the broad neurocircuitry of threat learning, including the dACC, anterior insula and vmPFC, mediated the experience of subjective arousal, while only a subset of these regions mediated threat-related SCR and valence. Furthermore, our data suggest dual vmPFC mechanisms modulate SCR during threat learning. Conversely during safety reversal, positive mediators were located in the vmPFC for all domains. We therefore conclude that appropriate responding during safety reversal learning is facilitated by participants engaging self- and valence-based processes. Taken together, our findings complement existing neurocircuitry models of human fear regulation and provide further insights into regional contributions to flexible threat-safety signal processing. We add novel evidence to support distinct underlying neural processes within these regions facilitating autonomic and subjective responding during threat learning and safety reversal. I discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of brain function and affective processing more broadly. We showed that patients with SAD did not show impairments in threat and safety reversal learning. I discuss how we may otherwise approach studying hypothesised maladaptive fear regulation in future studies.