Academic Services and Registrar - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableThe major membrane nuclease MnuA degrades neutrophil extracellular traps induced by Mycoplasma bovis(ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 2018-05)Mycoplasma bovis has been increasingly recognised worldwide as an economically important pathogen of cattle, causing a range of diseases, including pneumonia, mastitis, polyarthritis and otitis media. It is believed that M. bovis utilises a range of cell surface proteins, including nucleases, to evade the host immune response and survive. However, despite the importance of neutrophils in controlling pathogenic bacteria, the interaction between these cells and M. bovis is not well-characterised. In addition to phagocytosis, neutrophils combat pathogens through the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are composed of their nuclear and granular components, including DNA. Here we investigated the effect of the major membrane nuclease MnuA of M. bovis, which in vitro is responsible for the majority of the nuclease activity of M. bovis, on NET formation. We quantified NET formation by bovine neutrophils 4 h after stimulation with wild-type M. bovis, an mnuA mutant and a mnuA-pIRR45 complemented mnuA mutant. NETs were detected following stimulation of neutrophils with the mnuA mutant but not after exposure to either the wild-type or the mnuA-pIRR45 complemented mutant, and NETs were degraded in the presence of even low concentrations of wild type M. bovis. Surprisingly, there was no increase in levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in neutrophils stimulated with M. bovis, even though these neutrophils produced NETs. These results clearly demonstrate that M. bovis can induce NET formation in bovine neutrophils, but that the major membrane nuclease MnuA is able to rapidly degrade NETs, and thus is likely to play a significant role in virulence. In addition, M. bovis appears to induce NETs even though ROS production seems to be suppressed.
-
ItemAntimicrobial stewardship in the dairy industry: responding to the threat of antimicrobial resistance.(Wiley, 2019-07-01)Dairy Australia is the national service body for the Australian dairy industry. Its role is to help farmers adapt to a changing operating environment and achieve a profitable, sustainable dairy industry. Although the use of antibiotics in Australian agriculture is relatively low in global terms, Dairy Australia recognises important drivers for continuous improvement in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Dairy Australia's first strategic priority is to support profitable farms. This priority has driven the development of a range of on-farm change management programs in the animal health and welfare fields to optimise the unit cost of production and dairy cattle welfare. Dairy Australia's third strategic priority is to further develop a 'trusted dairy industry'. Previous and current work under these two strategies position the dairy industry favourably with respect to confronting the challenge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and supporting sound AMS with the guiding principle of 'as little as possible, as much as necessary'. However, given an incomplete but ongoing threat of AMR, more work is needed. Supported by Dairy Australia, the dairy industry has developed an antimicrobial use strategy aligning with the Australian Animal Sector National AMR Plan 2018.
-
ItemBreed structures in Australian dairy herds(WILEY, 2022-01)Breed structures of Australian dairy herds over time were described for a large subset of milk-recording herds. The focus for this study was to describe the use of crossbreeding by dairy farmers, specifically proportions of herds using crossbreeding, whether they were using two-breed or three-breed crossbreeding systems, and how herd-breed structures changed over time. The most common breed structure in Australian milk-recording herds between 2000 and 2013 was two-breed crossbreeding (39% of herd-years). The next most common breed structure was purebred (35%). Over the period studied, the proportion of herds that were purebred decreased, while the proportion of herds that were crossbreeding increased (particularly three-breed crossbreeding herds). Herd-breed structures and changes over time varied with region and with the herd's calving system. There were also considerable changes in breed structure within herds, including herds changing breed structure before reverting back to their original breed structure. These results indicate that breed structures in milk-recording dairy herds in Australia are dynamic, and that farmers have commonly employed crossbreeding strategies.