Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableCerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain differentiates behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia progressors from ‘phenocopy’ non‐progressors(Wiley, 2022-12)Background Distinguishing behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from non‐neurodegenerative ‘non‐progressor’, ‘phenocopy’ mimics of frontal lobe dysfunction, can be one of the most challenging clinical dilemmas. A biomarker of neuronal injury, neurofilament light chain (NfL), could reduce misdiagnosis and delay. Method Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) NfL, amyloid beta 1‐42 (AB42), total and phosphorylated tau (T‐tau, P‐tau) levels were examined in patients with an initial diagnosis of bvFTD. Based on follow up information, patients were categorised as Progressors. Non‐Progressors were subtyped in to Phenocopy Non‐Progressors (non‐neurological/neurodegenerative final diagnosis), and Static Non‐Progressors (static deficits, not fully explained by non‐neurological/neurodegenerative causes). Result Forty‐three patients were included: 20 Progressors, 23 Non‐Progressors (15 Phenocopy, 8 Static), 20 controls. NfL concentrations were lower in Non‐Progressors (Non‐Progressors Mean, M=554pg/mL, 95%CI:[461, 675], Phenocopy Non‐Progressors M=459pg/mL, 95%CI:[385, 539], Static Non‐Progressors M=730pg/mL, 95%CI:[516, 940]), compared to bvFTD Progressors (M=2397pg/mL, 95%CI:[1607, 3332]). NfL distinguished Progressors from Non‐Progressors with the highest accuracy (area under the curve 0.92, 90%/87% sensitivity/specificity, 86%/91% positive/negative predictive value, 88% accuracy). Static Non‐Progressors tended to have higher T‐tau and P‐tau levels compared to Phenocopy Non‐Progressors. Conclusion This study demonstrated strong diagnostic utility of CSF NfL in distinguishing bvFTD from phenocopy non‐progressor variants, at baseline, with high accuracy, in a real‐world clinical setting. This has important clinical implications to improve outcomes for patients and clinicians facing this challenging clinical dilemma, as well as for healthcare services, and clinical trials. Further research is required to investigate heterogeneity within the non‐progressor group and potential diagnostic algorithms, and prospective studies are underway assessing plasma NfL.
-
ItemNo Preview Available
-
ItemNo Preview AvailablePlasma neurofilament light chain and phosphorylated tau 181 in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders: moving closer towards a simple diagnostic test like a 'C‐reactive protein' for the brain?(Wiley, 2021-12)Abstract Background Accurate, timely diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders, in particular distinguishing primary psychiatric from neurological disorders and in younger people, can be challenging. There is a need for biomarkers to reduce the diagnostic odyssey and improve outcomes. Neurofilament light (NfL) has shown promise as a diagnostic biomarker in a wide range of disorders. Our Markers in Neuropsychiatric Disorders (MiND) Study builds on our pilot (Eratne et al, ANZJP, 2020), to explore the diagnostic and broader utility of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) NfL and other novel markers such as phosphorylated tau 181 (p‐tau181), in a broad range of psychiatric and neurodegenerative/neurological disorders, with a view of translation into routine clinical practice. Methods We assessed plasma and/or CSF NfL and p‐tau181 concentrations in broad cohorts, including: patients assessed for neurocognitive/psychiatric symptoms at Neuropsychiatry and Melbourne Young‐Onset Dementia services and other services, in a wide range of disorders including Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, Niemann‐Pick Type C, epilepsy, functional neurological disorders. The most recent primary consensus diagnosis informed by established diagnostic criteria was categorised: primary psychiatric disorder (PPD), neurodegenerative/neurological disorder (ND), or healthy controls (HC). Results Findings from over 500 patients/participants will be presented, which indicate that CSF and plasma NfL levels are significantly elevated in a broad range of ND compared to a broad range of PPD, and HC, and bvFTD progressors from phenocopy syndromes, differentiating with areas under the curve of >0.90, sensitivity and specificity >90%. Plasma P‐tau181 levels distinguished Alzheimer disease (mainly younger sporadic), compared to other neurodegenerative disorders, with AUC 0.90, 90% sensitivity and specificity. As recruitment, sample analysis, data collection is ongoing, the most up to date results will be presented. Conclusions NfL shows great promise as a diagnostic test to assist with the common, challenging diagnostic dilemma of distinguishing neurodegenerative from non‐neurodegenerative and primary psychiatric disorders. Plasma p‐tau181 shows strong diagnostic utility in younger‐onset Alzheimer disease. A significantly elevated NfL in someone with a psychiatric diagnosis should prompt consideration of neurodegenerative differentials. Plasma NfL could dramatically alter clinical care of patients with neuropsychiatric and neurological symptoms, improving outcomes for patients, their families, the healthcare system, and clinical trials.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableCould cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain reduce misdiagnosis in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders in a real‐world setting? A retrospective clinical and diagnostic utility study(Wiley, 2021-12)Abstract Background Patients presenting with neuropsychiatric symptoms often face significant diagnostic odyssey. Our recent research (Eratne et al, ANZJP, 2020) found neurofilament light (NfL) differentiated between neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders, with high accuracy. Yet the clinical utility of NfL, as to whether it can aid clinicians in avoiding misdiagnosis in a real‐world clinical setting, is unknown. Our primary aim was to measure the rates of diagnostic change in patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms assessed at a tertiary multidisciplinary service, and determine whether baseline cerebrospinal (CSF) NfL level could have prevented misdiagnoses, by predicting the final diagnosis after follow up. Methods We conducted a retrospective file review of patients assessed at an Australian neuropsychiatry and young‐onset dementia service between 2009‐2020. NfL levels were measured from CSF collected at their baseline assessment. Blinded investigators (MK, HD, DE) extracted clinical data including diagnoses from discharge summaries and outpatient letters from the initial assessment and re‐assessment. Baseline and final diagnoses were categorised as neurodegenerative disorder [ND], or, other non‐neurodegenerative conditions including primary psychiatric disorder [Other/PPD]. We also obtained follow‐up information on patients that were subsequently seen at external services where available. Results From a preliminary analysis of those with follow‐up information for at least a year (N=32), six patients’ diagnostic categories (19%) were revised (ND to Other/PPD=5; Other/PPD to ND=1). In all six cases (figure 2), baseline CSF NfL levels, using our previously established cut‐off, would have predicted the final revised diagnosis. As this study is underway, findings for over 200 patients will be presented for the Conference. Conclusions In a real‐world tertiary clinical setting, baseline CSF NfL would have accurately predicted diagnostic change, showing promise to aid clinicians assessing patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms, and reduce misdiagnosis. An elevated level could help exclude primary psychiatric provisional or differential diagnoses, and prompt assertive investigations for neurological and neurodegenerative causes. Conversely, a low NfL, could reassure against a neurodegenerative disorder, preventing unnecessary assessments. Timely and accurate diagnosis will reduce uncertainty, enable early care planning, reduce patient and carer burden, thus improving outcomes and the diagnostic odyssey faced by patients and families.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailablePlasma neurofilament light chain protein is not increased in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and first-degree relatives(SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2022-10)OBJECTIVE: Schizophrenia, a complex psychiatric disorder, is often associated with cognitive, neurological and neuroimaging abnormalities. The processes underlying these abnormalities, and whether a subset of people with schizophrenia have a neuroprogressive or neurodegenerative component to schizophrenia, remain largely unknown. Examining fluid biomarkers of diverse types of neuronal damage could increase our understanding of these processes, as well as potentially provide clinically useful biomarkers, for example with assisting with differentiation from progressive neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer and frontotemporal dementias. METHODS: This study measured plasma neurofilament light chain protein (NfL) using ultrasensitive Simoa technology, to investigate the degree of neuronal injury in a well-characterised cohort of people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia on clozapine (n = 82), compared to first-degree relatives (an at-risk group, n = 37), people with schizophrenia not treated with clozapine (n = 13), and age- and sex-matched controls (n = 59). RESULTS: We found no differences in NfL levels between treatment-resistant schizophrenia (mean NfL, M = 6.3 pg/mL, 95% confidence interval: [5.5, 7.2]), first-degree relatives (siblings, M = 6.7 pg/mL, 95% confidence interval: [5.2, 8.2]; parents, M after adjusting for age = 6.7 pg/mL, 95% confidence interval: [4.7, 8.8]), controls (M = 5.8 pg/mL, 95% confidence interval: [5.3, 6.3]) and not treated with clozapine (M = 4.9 pg/mL, 95% confidence interval: [4.0, 5.8]). Exploratory, hypothesis-generating analyses found weak correlations in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, between NfL and clozapine levels (Spearman's r = 0.258, 95% confidence interval: [0.034, 0.457]), dyslipidaemia (r = 0.280, 95% confidence interval: [0.064, 0.470]) and a negative correlation with weight (r = -0.305, 95% confidence interval: [-0.504, -0.076]). CONCLUSION: Treatment-resistant schizophrenia does not appear to be associated with neuronal, particularly axonal degeneration. Further studies are warranted to investigate the utility of NfL to differentiate treatment-resistant schizophrenia from neurodegenerative disorders such as behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, and to explore NfL in other stages of schizophrenia such as the prodome and first episode.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableCerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain differentiates behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia progressors from non-progressors(ELSEVIER, 2022-11-15)BACKGROUND: Distinguishing behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from non-neurodegenerative 'non-progressor' mimics of frontal lobe dysfunction, can be one of the most challenging clinical dilemmas. A biomarker of neuronal injury, neurofilament light chain (NfL), could reduce misdiagnosis and delay. METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) NfL, amyloid beta 1-42 (AB42), total and phosphorylated tau (T-tau, P-tau) levels were examined in patients with an initial diagnosis of bvFTD. Based on follow-up information, patients were categorised as Progressors or Non-Progressors: further subtyped into Non-Progressor Revised (non-neurological/neurodegenerative final diagnosis), and Non-Progressor Static (static deficits, not fully explained by non-neurological/neurodegenerative causes). RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included: 20 Progressors, 23 Non-Progressors (15 Non-Progressor Revised, 8 Non-Progressor Static), and 20 controls. NfL concentrations were lower in Non-Progressors (Non-Progressors Mean, M = 554 pg/mL, 95%CI:[461, 675], Non-Progressor Revised M = 459 pg/mL, 95%CI:[385, 539], and Non-Progressor Static M = 730 pg/mL, 95%CI:[516, 940]), compared to Progressors (M = 2397 pg/mL, 95%CI:[1607, 3332]). NfL distinguished Progressors from Non-Progressors with the highest accuracy (area under the curve 0.92, 90%/87% sensitivity/specificity, 86%/91% positive/negative predictive value, 88% accuracy). Non-Progressor Static tended to have higher T-tau and P-tau levels compared to Non-Progressor Revised Diagnoses. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated strong diagnostic utility of CSF NfL to distinguish bvFTD from non-progressor variants, at baseline, with high accuracy, in a real-world clinical setting. This has important clinical implications, to improve outcomes for patients and clinicians facing this challenging clinical dilemma, healthcare services, and clinical trials. Further research is required to investigate heterogeneity within the non-progressor group and potential diagnostic algorithms, and prospective studies are underway assessing plasma NfL.
-
ItemCerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain differentiates primary psychiatric disorders from rapidly progressive, Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal disorders in clinical settings(WILEY, 2022-11)INTRODUCTION: Many patients with cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms face diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis. We investigated whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light (NfL) and total-tau (t-tau) could assist in the clinical scenario of differentiating neurodegenerative (ND) from psychiatric disorders (PSY), and rapidly progressive disorders. METHODS: Biomarkers were examined in patients from specialist services (ND and PSY) and a national Creutzfeldt-Jakob registry (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease [CJD] and rapidly progressive dementias/atypically rapid variants of common ND, RapidND). RESULTS: A total of 498 participants were included: 197 ND, 67 PSY, 161 CJD, 48 RapidND, and 20 controls. NfL was elevated in ND compared to PSY and controls, with highest levels in CJD and RapidND. NfL distinguished ND from PSY with 95%/78% positive/negative predictive value, 92%/87% sensitivity/specificity, 91% accuracy. NfL outperformed t-tau in most real-life clinical diagnostic dilemma scenarios, except distinguishing CJD from RapidND. DISCUSSION: We demonstrated strong generalizable evidence for the diagnostic utility of CSF NfL in differentiating ND from psychiatric disorders, with high accuracy.
-
ItemCerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light concentration predicts brain atrophy and cognition in Alzheimer's disease(WILEY, 2020)INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light (NfL) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, its association with amyloid and tau pathology, as well as its potential to predict brain atrophy, cognition, and amyloid accumulation. METHODS: CSF NfL concentration was measured in 221 participants from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers & Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing (AIBL). RESULTS: CSF NfL levels as well as NfL/amyloid β (Aβ42) were significantly elevated in AD compared to healthy controls (HC; P < .001), and in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to HC (P = .008 NfL; P < .001 NfL/Aβ42). CSF NfL and NfL/Aβ42 differentiated AD from HC with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.84 and 0.90, respectively. CSF NfL and NfL/Aβ42 predicted cortical amyloid load, brain atrophy, and cognition. DISCUSSION: CSF NfL is a biomarker of neurodegeneration, correlating with cognitive impairment and brain neuropathology.