Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Tailored behavioural tests reveal early and progressive cognitive deficits in M1000 prion disease
    Senesi, M ; Lewis, V ; Adlard, PA ; Finkelstein, DI ; Kim, JH ; Collins, SJ (ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 2023-05)
    Prion diseases are pathogenically linked to the normal cellular prion protein (PrPC) misfolding into abnormal conformers (PrPSc), with PrPSc accumulation underpinning both transmission and neurotoxicity. Despite achieving this canonical understanding, however fundamental questions remain incompletely resolved, including the level of pathophysiological overlap between neurotoxic and transmitting species of PrPSc and the temporal profiles of their propagation. To further investigate the likely time of occurrence of significant levels of neurotoxic species during prion disease development, the well characterised in vivo M1000 murine model was employed. Following intracerebral inoculation, detailed serial cognitive and ethological testing at specified time points suggested subtle transition to early symptomatic disease from ∼50% of the overall disease course. In addition to observing a chronological order for impaired behaviours, different behavioural tests also showed distinctive profiles of evolving cognitive impairments with the Barnes maze demonstrating a relatively simple linear worsening of spatial learning and memory over an extended period while in contrast a conditioned fear memory paradigm previously untested in murine prion disease demonstrated more complex alterations during disease progression. These observations support the likely production of neurotoxic PrPSc from at least just prior to the mid-point of murine M1000 prion disease and illustrate the likely need to tailor the types of behavioural testing across the time course of disease progression for optimal detection of cognitive deficits.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain differentiates primary psychiatric disorders from rapidly progressive, Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal disorders in clinical settings
    Eratne, D ; Loi, SM ; Qiao-Xin, L ; Stehmann, C ; Malpas, CB ; Santillo, A ; Janelidze, S ; Cadwallader, C ; Walia, N ; Ney, B ; Lewis, V ; Senesi, M ; Fowler, C ; McGlade, A ; Varghese, S ; Ravanfar, P ; Kelso, W ; Farrand, S ; Keem, M ; Kang, M ; Goh, AMY ; Dhiman, K ; Gupta, V ; Watson, R ; Yassi, N ; Kaylor-Hughes, C ; Kanaan, R ; Perucca, P ; Dobson, H ; Vivash, L ; Ali, R ; O'Brien, TJ ; Hansson, O ; Zetterberg, H ; Blennow, K ; Walterfang, M ; Masters, CL ; Berkovic, SF ; Collins, S ; Velakoulis, D (WILEY, 2022-11)
    INTRODUCTION: Many patients with cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms face diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis. We investigated whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light (NfL) and total-tau (t-tau) could assist in the clinical scenario of differentiating neurodegenerative (ND) from psychiatric disorders (PSY), and rapidly progressive disorders. METHODS: Biomarkers were examined in patients from specialist services (ND and PSY) and a national Creutzfeldt-Jakob registry (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease [CJD] and rapidly progressive dementias/atypically rapid variants of common ND, RapidND). RESULTS: A total of 498 participants were included: 197 ND, 67 PSY, 161 CJD, 48 RapidND, and 20 controls. NfL was elevated in ND compared to PSY and controls, with highest levels in CJD and RapidND. NfL distinguished ND from PSY with 95%/78% positive/negative predictive value, 92%/87% sensitivity/specificity, 91% accuracy. NfL outperformed t-tau in most real-life clinical diagnostic dilemma scenarios, except distinguishing CJD from RapidND. DISCUSSION: We demonstrated strong generalizable evidence for the diagnostic utility of CSF NfL in differentiating ND from psychiatric disorders, with high accuracy.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Erratum to: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance in Australia: update to 31 December 2020.
    Stehmann, C ; Senesi, M ; Sarros, S ; McGlade, A ; Lewis, V ; Simpson, M ; Klug, G ; McLean, C ; Masters, CL ; Collins, SJ (Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, 2021-08-09)
    Erratum to Commun Dis Intell (2018) 2021;45 (https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2021.45.38).
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance in Australia: update to 31 December 2020 (vol 22, 45, 2021)
    Stehmann, C ; Senesi, M ; Sarros, S ; McGlade, A ; Lewis, V ; Simpson, M ; Klug, G ; McLean, C ; Masters, CL ; Collins, S (AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT, DEPT HEALTH & AGEING, 2021-08-09)
    Nationwide surveillance of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other human prion diseases is performed by the Australian National Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Registry (ANCJDR). National surveillance encompasses the period since 1 January 1970, with prospective surveillance occurring from 1 October 1993. Over this prospective surveillance period, considerable developments have occurred in pre-mortem diagnostics; in the delineation of new disease subtypes; and in a heightened awareness of prion diseases in healthcare settings. Surveillance practices of the ANCJDR have evolved and adapted accordingly. This report summarises the activities of the ANCJDR during 2020. Since the ANCJDR began offering diagnostic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 14-3-3 protein testing in Australia in September 1997, the annual number of referrals has steadily increased. In 2020, 510 domestic CSF specimens were referred for 14-3-3 protein testing and 85 persons with suspected human prion disease were formally added to the national register. As of 31 December 2020, just over half (44 cases) of the 85 suspect case notifications remain classified as 'incomplete'; 27 cases were excluded through either detailed clinical follow-up (9 cases) or neuropathological examination (18 cases); 18 cases were classified as 'definite' and eleven as 'probable' prion disease. For 2020, sixty percent of all suspected human-prion-disease-related deaths in Australia underwent neuropathological examination. No cases of variant or iatrogenic CJD were identified. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic did not affect prion disease surveillance outcomes in Australia.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance in Australia: update to 31 December
    Stehmann, C ; Senesi, M ; Sarros, S ; McGlade, A ; Simpson, M ; Klug, G ; McLean, C ; Masters, CL ; Collins, S (AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT, DEPT HEALTH & AGEING, 2020-07-14)
    Nationwide surveillance of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other human prion diseases is performed by the Australian National Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Registry (ANCJDR). National surveillance encompasses the period since 1 January 1970, with prospective surveillance occurring from 1 October 1993. Over this prospective surveillance period, considerable developments have occurred in pre-mortem diagnostics; in the delineation of new disease subtypes; and in a heightened awareness of prion diseases in healthcare settings. Surveillance practices of the ANCJDR have evolved and adapted accordingly. This report summarises the activities of the ANCJDR during 2019. Since the ANCJDR began offering diagnostic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 14-3-3 protein testing in Australia in September 1997, the annual number of referrals has steadily increased. In 2019, 513 domestic CSF specimens were referred for 14-3-3 protein testing and 85 persons with suspected human prion disease were formally added to the national register. As of 31 December 2019, just under half (42 cases) of the 85 suspect case notifications remain classified as 'incomplete'; 16 cases were excluded through either detailed clinical follow-up (3 cases) or neuropathological examination (13 cases); 20 cases were classified as 'definite' and seven as 'probable' prion disease. For 2019, sixty-three percent of all suspected human prion disease related deaths in Australia underwent neuropathological examination. No cases of variant or iatrogenic CJD were identified. Two possibly causal novel prion protein gene (PRNP) sequence variations were identified.