Ophthalmology (Eye & Ear Hospital) - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Correction of refractive error in the Victorian population: the feasibility of "off the shelf" spectacles
    Maini, Raj ; KEEFFE, JILL ; Weih, Le Ann ; McCarty, Catherine A. ; Taylor, Hugh R. (British Medical Association, 2001)
    Aims - To assess the feasibility of providing a stock of ready made spectacles for correction of refractive error in the general population. Methods - Data were collected in the Visual Impairment Project, a population based survey of Victorian residents aged 40 years or older in randomly selected urban and rural sample areas. This included a refractive eye examination and the proportion of subjects with hypermetropia, emmetropia (defined as -1.0 to +1.0D spherical equivalent), and myopia documented in the 40-60 year age group. Results - 2595 (54.8%) participants were aged between 40 and 60 years. Those with a best corrected visual acuity of less than 6/12, astigmatism of more than 1.25D, and anisometropia of more than 0.5D were excluded. 516 participants had refractive error which was deemed suitable for correction by “off the shelf” spectacles. This represents 19.9% of all participants between 40 and 60 years of age. Provision of spectacles in 0.5D increments would provide suitable stock spectacles for 85.5% of a -3.0 to +3.0D range or 89.2% of a -3.50 to +3.50D range. Conclusions - Ready made “off the shelf” spectacles could significantly alleviate visual morbidity due to refractive error in up to 20% of an urban population in Australia. This approach may also be useful in developing countries with poor access to optometric services.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Prevalence and predictors of open-angle glaucoma : results from the Visual Impairment Project
    Weih, LeAnn M. ; Mukesh, Nanjan ; McCarty, Catherine A. ; Taylor, Hugh R. (Elsevier (American Academy of Ophthalmology), 2001-11)
    Purpose: To determine the prevalence and investigate predictors of open-angle glaucoma in Victoria, Australia Design: Two-site, population-based cross-sectional study. Participants: Permanent residents aged 40 years and older at recruitment from 1992 through 1996. Methods: A cluster-stratified random sample of 4744 participants from two cohorts, urban and rural, participated. Participants completed a standardized interview regarding demographic, lifestyle, and medical characteristics and a dilated eye examination including measurement of intraocular pressure, visual fields, cup-to-disc ratios, and paired stereo photography of the optic discs. A consensus panel of six ophthalmologists determined glaucoma diagnosis. Main Outcome Measure: Diagnosis of glaucoma (possible, probable, definite). Results: The prevalence of possible glaucoma cases was 1.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60, 1.7), of probable cases was 0.70% (95% CI, 0.39, 1.0), and of definite cases was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.4, 2.2). There was a significant increase in glaucoma prevalence with age across all definitions, but there was no difference in age-standardized rates between genders. A total of 60% of probable and definite glaucoma cases were undiagnosed before this study. Adjusted for age, the strongest risk factor for glaucoma was a positive family history of glaucoma (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6, 5.3). Glaucoma patients who had not attended an eye care provider in the last 2 years were eight times (95% CI, 3.2, 20.4) more likely to have undiagnosed disease. Conclusions: These results support the importance of the genetic or familial basis of many glaucoma cases and highlight the need to develop appropriate techniques to screen for undiagnosed disease.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Prevalence of amblyopia and associated refractive errors in an adult population in Victoria, Australia
    Brown, Shayne A. ; Weih, LeAnn M. ; Fu, Cara L. ; Dimitrov, Peter N. ; Taylor, Hugh R. ; McCarty, Catherine A. (Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000)
    The study aimed to describe the prevalence of amblyopia and associated refractive errors among an adult Australian population. The Visual Impairment Project (VIP) is a population-based study of age-related eye disease in the state of Victoria, Australia. Data were collected through standardised interviews and orthoptic and ophthalmic dilated examinations. Amblyopia was defined as best-corrected visual acuity of 6/9 or worse in the absence of any pathological cause. The participants were 3,265 urban residents and 1,456 rural residents of the VIP ranging in age from 40-92 years (mean = 59 years; 53% female). The prevalence of unilateral amblyopia was 3.06 % (95% C.I. 2.59, 3.53). Amblyopia was not found to be statistically different by age group (P=0.096), gender (p=0.675), or place of birth (p=0.14). Anisometropia was statistically more common (p<0.001) in amblyopic cases (51.1% ) compared to the normal population (9.7%), and 54% of amblyopic eyes had visual acuity of worse than 6/12. Amblyopia is a significant cause of unilateral reduced visual acuity in a population aged 40 years and older. Anisometropia was more prevalent and the degree of anisometropia was greater in the amblyopic group compared with the normal population. Oblique astigmatism was more prevalent in the aIpblyopic group compared with the normal population.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Assessment of adult stereopsis using the Lang 1 Stereotest: a pilot study
    Brown, Shayne ; Weih, LeAnn ; Mukesh, Nanjan ; MCCARTY, CATHERINE ; TAYLOR, HUGH ( 2001)
    Background and Purpose: To assess the use of the Lang 1 Stereotest as a vision-screening test for adults, for which little is known or reported. Method: The Lang 1 Stereotest was administered to 292 consecutive participants of the Visual Impairment Project (VIP) five year followup study, which is a population based study of eye disease in Melbourne, Australia. 56.9% were female. The mean age was 59.4 years, range 44-90 years. A "positive" stereoscopic response was recorded where the stereoscopic target image was correctly named; a "partial positive" response where depth was appreciated but the shape could not be named; and a "negative" response where there was no appreciation of a stereo effect. The responses were further categorized so that the test was either "passed" or "failed". A "pass" score was 3/3 positive responses; 3/3 partial positive responses or 2/3 positive and/or partial positive responses where the negative response was at the 550" of arc stereoacuity level. "Failure" was 3/3 negative responses and 2/3 negative responses where the positive or partial positive response as at the 1200" level. (For complete abstract open document)