Infrastructure Engineering - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The evaluation of surge flow in border irrigation (with special reference to cracking soils)
    Turral, Hugh ( 1993)
    Surge flow was identified as a potential method of improving farm water management to both reduce water use and minimise accessions to water table, and therefore to help address the salinity and water-logging problems facing the irrigated areas of the Murray-Darling Basin. Surge flow has been intensively researched in furrow irrigation in the USA, but border strips (which are the dominant application method in south-eastern Australia) and cracking soils have received minimal attention. This study investigated surge response in border irrigation with particular reference to cracking clay soils. Two years' field work resulted in a substantial data set covering four soil types and a range of management options. Surge flow reduces water use on cracking clays by 15-40% compared with continuous irrigation under similar conditions and given the same level of management. A negative response was observed on homogenous fine sandy loams, with up to 30% more water applied in surge flow. The positive response was obtained over a range of cycle ratios from 0.2-0.5 and with off-times from 30-300 minutes. Measured soil moisture distributions in the second season showed that application uniformity was better using long offtimes of around 300 minutes. Calculations of the water balance indicate that a greater proportion of applied water is retained in the root zone in surge flow and accessions are a small proportion of those in conventional irrigation. The strong field response was not supported by infiltration test data which recorded greater water intake in surge flow than in continuous tests. The recirculating infiltrometer over-estimated cumulative infiltration for both surge and continuous application, in both seasons. It was later observed that water advances in subsurface cracks in the off-time, up to 70 m ahead of the surface stream. Additional analysis indicates that the surge response is largely due to a mechanism connected with this phenomenon, which helps reconcile the disagreement between field and infiltration test data. Surges overlapped in every test and this phenomenon cannot be simulated by existing hydraulic models of surge flow and substantial revisions are needed before meaningful calibration can be undertaken. The field work provided a clear statement of the difficulty of obtaining infiltration data on cracking soils, and highlights the need for effective real-time estimation of infiltration parameters to overcome severe temporal and spatial variability in infiltration conditions. An inverse solution of the Zero Inertia model was developed, using a constrained Simplex optimisation algorithm to determine infiltration and roughness parameters from advance and depth profile data plus a compound objective function of the two. Global parameters, with reasonably effective predictive performance, were obtained using a compound objective function with continuous flow data sets and, more tentatively, for surge flow. This work provides practical possibilities for automation of border irrigation, using as little as two sensors to determine one roughness and one infiltration parameter from advance data, providing the Kostiakov exponent can be reliably classified. A minimum offour sensors are needed to identify two Simple Kostiakov infiltration parameters and one roughness value. Longer term, farm-scale trials are now required.