Physiotherapy - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5
-
ItemThe Knowledge Translation of Early Cerebral Palsy (KiTE CP) study: Implementing Screening among a High-risk Prospective Cohort of Australian Infants(MOSBY-ELSEVIER, 2024-05)OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of the international guidelines for the early diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP) and engagement in the screening process in an Australian cohort of infants with neonatal risk factors for CP. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of infants with neonatal risk factors recruited at <6 months corrected age from 11 sites in the states of Victoria, New South Wales, and Queensland, Australia. First, we implemented a multimodal knowledge translation strategy including barrier identification, technology integration, and special interest groups. Screening was implemented as follows: infants with clinical indications for neuroimaging underwent magnetic resonance imaging and/or cranial ultrasound. The Prechtl General Movements Assessment (GMA) was recorded clinically or using an app (Baby Moves). Infants with absent or abnormal fidgety movements on GMA videos were offered further assessment using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE). Infants with atypical findings on 2/3 assessments met criteria for high risk of CP. RESULTS: Of the 597 infants (56% male) recruited, 95% (n = 565) received neuroimaging, 90% (n = 537) had scorable GMA videos (2% unscorable/8% no video), and 25% (n = 149) HINE. Overall, 19% of the cohort (n = 114/597) met criteria for high risk of CP, 57% (340/597) had at least 2 normal assessments (of neuroimaging, GMA or HINE), and 24% (n = 143/597) had insufficient assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Early CP screening was implemented across participating sites using a multimodal knowledge translation strategy. Although the COVID-19 pandemic affected recruitment rates, there was high engagement in the screening process. Reasons for engagement in early screening from parents and clinicians warrant further contextualization and investigation.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableSchool Readiness in Children Born <30 Weeks' Gestation at Risk for Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Prospective Cohort Study(LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2022-06)OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether school readiness differs between children born <30 weeks' gestation who are classified as at risk for developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and those who are not. METHODS: This study was a prospective cohort study of children born <30 weeks' gestation. Children were classified as at risk for DCD at a corrected age of 4 to 5 years if they scored <16th centile on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2), had a full scale IQ score of ≥80 on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition (WPPSI-IV), and had no cerebral palsy. Children were assessed on 4 school readiness domains: (1) health/physical development [Physical Health domain of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test, and Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire], (2) social-emotional development (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and PedsQL psychosocial domains), (3) cognitive skills/general knowledge (WPPSI-IV), and (4) language skills (WPPSI-IV). RESULTS: Of 123 children assessed, 16 were ineligible (IQ < 80 or cerebral palsy: n = 15; incomplete MABC-2: n = 1); 28 of 107 (26%) eligible children were at risk for DCD. Children at risk for DCD had poorer performance on all school readiness domains, with group differences of more than 0.4 SD in health/physical development, social-emotional development, and language skills and up to 0.8 SD for cognitive skills/general knowledge compared with those not at risk of DCD. CONCLUSION: Being at risk for DCD in children born <30 weeks' gestation is associated with challenges in multiple school readiness domains, not only the health/physical domain.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableSpatiotemporal gait variables and step-to-step variability in preschool-aged children born < 30 weeks' gestation and at term in preferred speed, dual-task paradigm, and tandem walking(ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, 2022-02)BACKGROUND: Children born very preterm (< 32 weeks' gestation) are at greater risk of motor impairment and executive/attentional dysfunctions than term-born children; however, little is known about how functional tasks, including walking, may be affected by very preterm birth. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does the gait pattern of preschool-age children born < 30 weeks compare with term-born controls under a variety of walking conditions? METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, children born < 30 weeks and at term were assessed at 4.5-5 years' corrected age, blinded to birth group. Four walking conditions were assessed using the GAITRite® system: preferred speed, cognitive dual-task, motor dual-task, and tandem walking. Gait variables analysed included speed, cadence, step length, step time, base of support (BOS), and single and double support time. Spatiotemporal variables were compared between groups using linear regression, adjusting for lower-limb length, corrected age at assessment, and number of trials. RESULTS: 224 children (112 < 30 weeks and 112 term-born) were assessed. Gait variables of children born < 30 weeks did not differ from their term-born peers when walking at their preferred speed, except for higher BOS variability (mean difference [MD] = 0.19 cm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10, 0.27, p < 0.001). Under the motor dual-task condition, children born < 30 weeks walked faster (MD= 3.06 cm/s, 95% CI 0.14, 5.97, p = 0.040), with a longer step length (MD= 1.10 cm, 95%CI 0.19, 2.01, p = 0.018), and a wider BOS (MD= 0.37 cm, 95%CI 0.06, 0.67, p = 0.019). In cognitive dual-task and tandem conditions, children born < 30 weeks walked with a wider BOS compared with term-born peers (MD= 0.43 cm, 95%CI 0.05, 0.81, p = 0.028; and MD= 0.30 cm, 95%CI 0.09, 0.51, p = 0.005, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: This research highlights the need to consider the walking performance of preschool-age children born < 30 weeks under challenging conditions, such as dual-task or tandem walking, when assessing gait patterns and planning interventions.
-
ItemImpact of moderate and late preterm birth on neurodevelopment, brain development and respiratory health at school age: protocol for a longitudinal cohort study (LaPrem study)(BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2021)INTRODUCTION: Children born moderate to late preterm (MLP, 32-36 weeks' gestation) account for approximately 85% of all preterm births globally. Compared with children born at term, children born MLP are at increased risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. Despite making up the largest group of preterm children, developmental outcomes of children born MLP are less well studied than in other preterm groups. This study aimed to (1) compare neurodevelopmental, respiratory health and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes between children born MLP and term at 9 years of age; (2) examine the differences in brain growth trajectory from infancy to 9 years between children born MLP and term; and in children born MLP; (3) examine the relationship between brain development and neurodevelopment at 9 years; and (4) identify risk factors for poorer outcomes at 9 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The "LaPrem" (Late Preterm MRI Study) study is a longitudinal cohort study of children born MLP and term controls, born at the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia, between 2010 and 2013. Participants were recruited in the neonatal period and were previously followed up at 2 and 5 years. This 9-year school-age follow-up includes neuropsychology, motor and physical activities, and lung function assessments, as well as brain MRI. Outcomes at 9 years will be compared between birth groups using linear and logistic regressions. Trajectories of brain development will be compared between birth groups using mixed effects models. The relationships between MRI and neurodevelopmental outcomes, as well as other early predictors of poor 9-year outcomes, will be explored using linear and logistic regression. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the human research ethics committee at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Study outcomes will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and social media.
-
ItemMissing out on precious time: Extending paid parental leave for parents of babies admitted to neonatal intensive or special care units for prolonged periods(WILEY, 2022-03)In Australia, approximately 18% of newborn babies are admitted to a neonatal intensive or special care nursery. While most babies admitted to a neonatal intensive or special care nursery are discharged home within a few weeks, around 6% of babies spend more than 2 weeks in hospital. For the parents of these babies, much of their leave entitlements (Australian Government Paid Parental Leave Scheme is up to18 weeks for the primary care giver and up to 2 weeks for partners) are used before their baby comes home from hospital. The time babies and parents spend together in the early developmental period, during the hospitalisation and when the baby is discharged home, is crucial for optimal child development and bonding. Yet care givers who have a baby admitted to neonatal intensive or special care for extended periods are not currently entitled to any extra parental leave payments in Australia. We recommend the Australian Paid Parental Leave Act is changed to allow primary carers access to 1 week of extra parental leave pay for every week in hospital (for babies admitted to hospital for more than 2 weeks), up to a maximum of 14 weeks. For fathers and partners of these babies, we recommend an additional 2 weeks of extra Dad and Partner Pay. The net cost, taking into account likely productivity benefits, would be less than 1.5% of the current cost of the scheme and would improve health and socio-economic outcomes for the baby, family and society.