Physiotherapy - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableCircus activities as a health intervention for children, youths, and adolescents: a scoping review protocol(LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2022-01)OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to map the evidence on circus activities described and/or evaluated as a health intervention for children, youths, and adolescents. Increased understanding of how these interventions work, and gaps identified, will allow researchers and practitioners to advance the science behind these approaches. INTRODUCTION: Circus activities are proposed in the literature as a health intervention, due to their variety, non-competitive nature, and potential to develop fundamental physical and social skills. For the purposes of this review, circus activities as a health intervention are defined as aerial, acrobatic, equilibristic, and manipulation skills taught to participants to maintain, improve, or modify health, functioning, or health conditions. INCLUSION CRITERIA: English-language evidence will be considered where circus activities as a health intervention are described and/or evaluated for participants up to 24 years of age, or who are defined as children, youths, or adolescents. Literature will be excluded where the focus of the intervention is clowning, magic, or drama games, or where circus activities are not the therapeutic part of the activity. METHODS: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Scopus (Elsevier), PsycINFO (Ovid), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and Google Scholar will be searched for peer-reviewed and gray literature. No restriction on dates, type, methodology, or setting will be imposed, but limits will include "human" and "English language." Screening and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. Reference lists of included sources will be screened. Results will be presented in diagrammatic or tabular format, alongside a narrative description, under headings aligning with the research sub-questions.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableSchool Readiness in Children Born <30 Weeks' Gestation at Risk for Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Prospective Cohort Study(LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2022-06)OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether school readiness differs between children born <30 weeks' gestation who are classified as at risk for developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and those who are not. METHODS: This study was a prospective cohort study of children born <30 weeks' gestation. Children were classified as at risk for DCD at a corrected age of 4 to 5 years if they scored <16th centile on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2), had a full scale IQ score of ≥80 on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition (WPPSI-IV), and had no cerebral palsy. Children were assessed on 4 school readiness domains: (1) health/physical development [Physical Health domain of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test, and Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire], (2) social-emotional development (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and PedsQL psychosocial domains), (3) cognitive skills/general knowledge (WPPSI-IV), and (4) language skills (WPPSI-IV). RESULTS: Of 123 children assessed, 16 were ineligible (IQ < 80 or cerebral palsy: n = 15; incomplete MABC-2: n = 1); 28 of 107 (26%) eligible children were at risk for DCD. Children at risk for DCD had poorer performance on all school readiness domains, with group differences of more than 0.4 SD in health/physical development, social-emotional development, and language skills and up to 0.8 SD for cognitive skills/general knowledge compared with those not at risk of DCD. CONCLUSION: Being at risk for DCD in children born <30 weeks' gestation is associated with challenges in multiple school readiness domains, not only the health/physical domain.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableAcceptability of Dance PREEMIE (a Dance PaRticipation intervention for Extremely prEterm children with Motor Impairment at prEschool age) from the perspectives of families and dancer teachers: a reflexive thematic analysis(TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 2023-06-03)BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) participation is important for children born extremely preterm or extremely low birthweight as it provides opportunities to improve motor skills and cardiovascular fitness; however there is little evidence on interventions promoting PA participation for this group, particularly at preschool age. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the acceptability, a critical component of intervention feasibility, of a novel dance participation intervention. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews explored the acceptability of Dance PREEMIE, a Dance PaRticipation intervention for Extremely prEterm children with Motor Impairment at prEschool age (trial registration ACTRN12619001266156), from the perspectives of dance teachers delivering the intervention (n = 6), and parents of participating children (n = 6). Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Five themes were developed: 1) placing the child center-stage: a shared motivation to promote child wellbeing and development; 2) Dance PREEMIE as a catalyst for participation; 3) child development takes time, practice and exposure; 4) the value of being informed; and 5) dance teachers as architects of the learning environment. CONCLUSION: Dance PREEMIE was acceptable to both parents of participating children and dance teachers. Findings from this study may inform future interventions aiming to improve PA participation for children with motor impairment at preschool age.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableSpatiotemporal gait variables and step-to-step variability in preschool-aged children born < 30 weeks' gestation and at term in preferred speed, dual-task paradigm, and tandem walking(ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, 2022-02)BACKGROUND: Children born very preterm (< 32 weeks' gestation) are at greater risk of motor impairment and executive/attentional dysfunctions than term-born children; however, little is known about how functional tasks, including walking, may be affected by very preterm birth. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does the gait pattern of preschool-age children born < 30 weeks compare with term-born controls under a variety of walking conditions? METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, children born < 30 weeks and at term were assessed at 4.5-5 years' corrected age, blinded to birth group. Four walking conditions were assessed using the GAITRite® system: preferred speed, cognitive dual-task, motor dual-task, and tandem walking. Gait variables analysed included speed, cadence, step length, step time, base of support (BOS), and single and double support time. Spatiotemporal variables were compared between groups using linear regression, adjusting for lower-limb length, corrected age at assessment, and number of trials. RESULTS: 224 children (112 < 30 weeks and 112 term-born) were assessed. Gait variables of children born < 30 weeks did not differ from their term-born peers when walking at their preferred speed, except for higher BOS variability (mean difference [MD] = 0.19 cm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10, 0.27, p < 0.001). Under the motor dual-task condition, children born < 30 weeks walked faster (MD= 3.06 cm/s, 95% CI 0.14, 5.97, p = 0.040), with a longer step length (MD= 1.10 cm, 95%CI 0.19, 2.01, p = 0.018), and a wider BOS (MD= 0.37 cm, 95%CI 0.06, 0.67, p = 0.019). In cognitive dual-task and tandem conditions, children born < 30 weeks walked with a wider BOS compared with term-born peers (MD= 0.43 cm, 95%CI 0.05, 0.81, p = 0.028; and MD= 0.30 cm, 95%CI 0.09, 0.51, p = 0.005, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: This research highlights the need to consider the walking performance of preschool-age children born < 30 weeks under challenging conditions, such as dual-task or tandem walking, when assessing gait patterns and planning interventions.
-
ItemImpact of current Australian paid parental leave on families of preterm and sick infants(WILEY, 2022-11)AIM: Parents of preterm or sick infants are at increased risk of mental health problems. The financial stress associated with an infant's prolonged hospital stay can have an additional negative effect on families' wellbeing and child development. This study explores parent use of Australian paid parental leave (PPL) and the financial impact of having an infant requiring neonatal care. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional, online survey study conducted from November 2020 to February 2021. Participants were parents of babies born from 1 January 2013, admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery in Australia. The survey explored use of Australian Government and private sector PPL, and financial stress. Parent-reported anxiety and depression were measured using the EuroQol Group 5D-5L Anxiety and Stress Subscale. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-one parents responded of which 93% had a preterm infant. Seventy-three percent of infants were hospitalised for more than 1 month, and 34% were readmitted to hospital within the first year following discharge home. Eighty-three percent of parents reported moderate, severe or extreme levels of anxiety or depression. Seventy-six percent reported that having a child in hospital had a moderate-very large financial impact on their family. Parents identified main costs to be travel, food, inability to work and direct medical costs. CONCLUSIONS: Having an infant born preterm or sick has significant emotional and financial implications for families. The current Australian Government PPL scheme does not adequately support parents of preterm or sick infants, and a change is urgently needed to improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.
-
ItemCircus Activities as a Health Intervention for Children, Youth, and Adolescents: A Scoping Review(MDPI, 2023-03)Circus activities are emerging as an engaging and unique health intervention. This scoping review summarises the evidence on this topic for children and young people aged up to 24 years to map (a) participant characteristics, (b) intervention characteristics, (c) health and wellbeing outcomes, and (d) to identify evidence gaps. Using scoping review methodology, a systematic search of five databases and Google Scholar was conducted up to August 2022 for peer-reviewed and grey literature. Fifty-seven of 897 sources of evidence were included (42 unique interventions). Most interventions were undertaken with school-aged participants; however, four studies included participants with age ranges over 15 years. Interventions targeted both general populations and those with defined biopsychosocial challenges (e.g., cerebral palsy, mental illness, or homelessness). Most interventions utilised three or more circus disciplines and were undertaken in naturalistic leisure settings. Dosage could be calculated for 15 of the 42 interventions (range one-96 h). Improvements in physical and/or social-emotional outcomes were reported for all studies. There is emerging evidence of positive health outcomes resulting from circus activities used in general populations and those with defined biopsychosocial challenges. Future research should focus on detailed reporting of intervention elements and increasing the evidence base in preschool-aged children and within populations with the greatest need.
-
ItemLow rates of motor-related healthcare for 5-year children born extremely preterm with movement difficulty: Where to next?(WILEY, 2022-09)This commentary is on the original article by Costa et al. on pages 1131–1144 of this issue.
-
ItemBarriers and facilitators to community participation for preschool age children born very preterm: a prospective cohort study(WILEY, 2021-06)AIM: We compared preschool age children born very preterm with term-born controls to: (1) understand the association between very preterm birth and community participation, (2) determine if motor impairment or social risk affect participation differently between groups, and (3) understand environmental barriers and supports to participation for parents. METHOD: Forty-eight children born very preterm (<30wks' gestation; 22 males, 26 females) and 96 controls (47 males, 49 females) were assessed at 4 to 5 years' corrected age for community participation using the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure. Motor skills were assessed using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition and the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire. RESULTS: Children born very preterm participated less frequently than term-born children (difference in means=-0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.54 to -0.03, p=0.029). Social risk was associated with lower frequency (interaction p<0.001) and involvement (interaction p=0.05) in community activities for children in the very preterm group only. Parents of children born very preterm perceived more barriers (odds ratio=4.32, 95% CI 1.46-12.77, p=0.008) and environmental factors to be less supportive of participation than parents of controls (difference in medians=-6.21, 95% CI -11.42 to -1.00, p=0.02). INTERPRETATION: Children born very preterm may benefit from ongoing support to promote participation, especially in families of higher social risk.
-
ItemMovement-based interventions for preschool-age children with, or at risk of, motor impairment: a systematic review(WILEY, 2020-03)AIM: To explore the efficacy of movement-based interventions to improve motor skills in preschool-age children with, or at risk of, motor impairment, including those with a diagnosis of cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorder, and developmental coordination disorder. METHOD: Relevant electronic databases were searched for randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials. Outcomes were classified using domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children & Youth version. Quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d. RESULTS: Seventeen articles exploring a heterogeneity of intervention types, population groups, and outcome measures met the inclusion criteria. Movement-based interventions did not significantly improve outcomes in either the body structure and function or activity domains in most studies. No studies used a participation outcome measure. INTERPRETATION: There is a paucity of evidence exploring movement-based interventions in the preschool-age group. Although movement-based interventions showed potential for improving body structure and function and activity outcomes for children with motor impairment, results were mostly not significant. Small sample sizes, variable study quality, and risk of bias limit confidence in the results. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The evidence is inconclusive to support movement-based interventions in this group. No studies used outcome measures assessing participation. Variability in intervention type and study quality limit confidence in results.
-
Item