Physiotherapy - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 26
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Measures of Bipedal Toe-Ground Clearance Asymmetry to Characterize Gait in Stroke Survivors.
    Datta, S ; Begg, R ; Rao, AS ; Karmakar, C ; Bajelan, S ; Said, C ; Palaniswami, M (IEEE, 2021-11)
    Post-stroke hemiparesis often impairs gait and increases the risks of falls. Low and variable Minimum Toe Clearance (MTC) from the ground during the swing phase of the gait cycle has been identified as a major cause of such falls. In this paper, we study MTC characteristics in 30 chronic stroke patients, extracted from gait patterns during treadmill walking, using infrared sensors and motion analysis camera units. We propose objective measures to quantify MTC asymmetry between the paretic and non-paretic limbs using Poincaré analysis. We show that these subject independent Gait Asymmetry Indices (GAIs) represent temporal variations of relative MTC differences between the two limbs and can distinguish between healthy and stroke participants. Compared to traditional measures of cross-correlation between the MTC of the two limbs, these measures are better suited to automate gait monitoring during stroke rehabilitation. Further, we explore possible clusters within the stroke data by analysing temporal dispersion of MTC features, which reveals that the proposed GAIs can also be potentially used to quantify the severity of lower limb hemiparesis in chronic stroke.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Immediate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the work and personal lives of Australian hospital clinical staff
    Holton, S ; Wynter, K ; Trueman, M ; Bruce, S ; Sweeney, S ; Crowe, S ; Dabscheck, A ; Eleftheriou, P ; Booth, S ; Hitch, D ; Said, CM ; Haines, KJ ; Rasmussen, B (CSIRO PUBLISHING, 2021)
    Objective This study investigated the short-term psychosocial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital clinical staff, specifically their self-reported concerns and perceived impact on their work and personal lives. Methods Nurses, midwives, doctors and allied health staff at a large metropolitan tertiary health service in Melbourne, Australia, completed an anonymous online cross-sectional survey between 15 May and 10 June 2020. The survey assessed respondents' COVID-19 contact status, concerns related to COVID-19 and other effects of COVID-19. Space was provided for free-text comments. Results Respondents were mostly concerned about contracting COVID-19, infecting family members and caring for patients with COVID-19. Concerns about accessing and using personal protective equipment, redeployment and their ability to provide high-quality patient care during the pandemic were also reported. Pregnant staff expressed uncertainty about the possible impact of COVID-19 on their pregnancy. Despite their concerns, few staff had considered resigning, and positive aspects of the pandemic were also described. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has had a considerable impact on the work and personal lives of hospital clinical staff. Staff, particularly those who are pregnant, would benefit from targeted well-being and support initiatives that address their concerns and help them manage their work and personal lives. What is known about the topic? The COVID-19 pandemic is having an impact on healthcare workers' psychological well-being. Little is known about their COVID-19-related concerns and the perceived impact of the pandemic on their work and personal lives, particularly hospital clinical staff during the 'first wave' of the pandemic in Australia. What does this paper add? This paper contributes to a small but emerging evidence base about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the work and personal lives of hospital clinical staff. Most staff were concerned about their own health and the risk to their families, friends and colleagues. Despite their concerns, few had considered resigning. Uncertainty about the possible impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy was also reported. What are the implications for practitioners? During the current and future pandemics, staff, especially those who are pregnant, would benefit from targeted well-being and support initiatives that address their concerns and help them manage the impact on their health, work and personal lives.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Implementation of the StandingTall programme to prevent falls in older people: a process evaluation protocol
    Taylor, ME ; Todd, C ; O'Rourke, S ; Clemson, LM ; Close, JCT ; Lord, SR ; Lung, T ; Berlowitz, DJ ; Blennerhassett, J ; Chow, J ; Dayhew, J ; Hawley-Hague, H ; Hodge, W ; Howard, K ; Johnson, P ; Lasrado, R ; McInerney, G ; Merlene, M ; Miles, L ; Said, CM ; White, L ; Wilson, N ; Zask, A ; Delbaere, K (BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2021)
    INTRODUCTION: One in three people aged 65 years and over fall each year. The health, economic and personal impact of falls will grow substantially in the coming years due to population ageing. Developing and implementing cost-effective strategies to prevent falls and mobility problems among older people is therefore an urgent public health challenge. StandingTall is a low-cost, unsupervised, home-based balance exercise programme delivered through a computer or tablet. StandingTall has a simple user-interface that incorporates physical and behavioural elements designed to promote compliance. A large randomised controlled trial in 503 community-dwelling older people has shown that StandingTall is safe, has high adherence rates and is effective in improving balance and reducing falls. The current project targets a major need for older people and will address the final steps needed to scale this innovative technology for widespread use by older people across Australia and internationally. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This project will endeavour to recruit 300 participants across three sites in Australia and 100 participants in the UK. The aim of the study is to evaluate the implementation of StandingTall into the community and health service settings in Australia and the UK. The nested process evaluation will use both quantitative and qualitative methods to explore uptake and acceptability of the StandingTall programme and associated resources. The primary outcome is participant adherence to the StandingTall programme over 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the South East Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC reference 18/288) in Australia and the North West- Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee (IRAS ID: 268954) in the UK. Dissemination will be via publications, conferences, newsletter articles, social media, talks to clinicians and consumers and meetings with health departments/managers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619001329156.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Critically appraised paper: Tailored prescription of digitally enabled rehabilitation may improve mobility, but not physical activity, in geriatric and neurological rehabilitation [commentary]
    Said, CM (Elsevier, 2020-10-01)
    Question: Does tailored prescription of digitally enabled rehabilitation using affordable devices improve mobility and physical activity in people with mobility limitations admitted to aged care or neurological rehabilitation? Design: Pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessment. Setting: Three inpatient rehabilitation (aged care, neurological rehabilitation) hospitals in Australia. Participants: Adults with reduced mobility (defined using Short Physical Performance Battery score < 12), clinician-assessed capacity for improvement, life expectancy > 12 months, anticipated length of stay at least 10 days from randomisation, and able to maintain standing position (assistance of one person permitted). Key exclusion criteria were cognitive or visual impairment likely to interfere with device use, inability to communicate in English, medical conditions prohibiting exercise and anticipated discharge to nursing home. Randomisation of 300 participants allocated 149 to usual care plus digitally enabled rehabilitation and 151 to usual care only. Interventions: Both groups received usual multidisciplinary rehabilitation care. In addition, the intervention group was prescribed 30 to 60 minutes of digitally enabled rehabilitation (virtual reality video games, activity monitors, tablet and smartphone exercise applications) 5 days a week in hospital and after discharge (using loaned devices) for 6 months. The digitally enabled rehabilitation was individually tailored and progressed by a physiotherapist. Outcome measures: Co-primary outcomes were mobility (performance-based Short Physical Performance Battery) and upright time as a proxy for physical activity (proportion of day upright measured by activPAL, averaged over 7 days) 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included performance- based and patient-reported measures of mobility and physical activity. Results: A total of 258 participants (129 control,129 intervention) completed the 6-month assessments. At the 6-month follow-up, the change in mobility score on the Short Physical Performance Battery was greater for the intervention group than the control group (MD0.2 points, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.3), but there was no evidence of a between-group difference in upright time (MD -0.2, 95% CI -2.7 to 2.3). Between-group differences favoured the intervention group across most secondary mobility outcomes, but there was no evidence of between-group differences for most other secondary outcomes including steps taken per day. Conclusion: Digitally enabled rehabilitation to promote mobility and physical activity in mobility-limited adults receiving geriatric or neurological inpatient rehabilitation can improve mobility, but does not appear to increase time spent upright.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Fatal and Nonfatal Events Within 14 days After Early, Intensive Mobilization Poststroke
    Bernhardt, J ; Borschmann, K ; Collier, JM ; Thrift, AG ; Langhorne, P ; Middleton, S ; Lindley, RI ; Dewey, HM ; Bath, P ; Said, CM ; Churilov, L ; Ellery, F ; Bladin, C ; Reid, CM ; Frayne, JH ; Srikanth, V ; Read, SJ ; Donnan, GA (LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2021-02-23)
    OBJECTIVE: This tertiary analysis from A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) examined fatal and nonfatal serious adverse events (SAEs) at 14 days. METHOD: AVERT was a prospective, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomized international clinical trial comparing mobility training commenced <24 hours poststroke, termed very early mobilization (VEM), to usual care (UC). Primary outcome was assessed at 3 months. Patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 24 hours of onset were included. Treatment with thrombolytics was allowed. Patients with severe premorbid disability or comorbidities were excluded. Interventions continued for 14 days or hospital discharge if less. The primary early safety outcome was fatal SAEs within 14 days. Secondary outcomes were nonfatal SAEs classified as neurologic, immobility-related, and other. Mortality influences were assessed using binary logistic regression adjusted for baseline stroke severity (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score) and age. RESULTS: A total of 2,104 participants were randomized to VEM (n = 1,054) or UC (n = 1,050) with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range [IQR] 63-80) and NIHSS 7 (IQR 4-12). By 14 days, 48 had died in VEM, 32 in UC, age and stroke severity adjusted odds ratio of 1.76 (95% confidence interval 1.06-2.92, p = 0.029). Stroke progression was more common in VEM. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed higher odds of death in intracerebral hemorrhage and >80 years subgroups, but there was no significant treatment by subgroup interaction. No difference in nonfatal SAEs was found. CONCLUSION: While the overall case fatality at 14 days poststroke was only 3.8%, mortality adjusted for age and stroke severity was increased with high dose and intensive training compared to usual care. Stroke progression was more common in VEM. REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12606000185561. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that very early mobilization increases mortality at 14 days poststroke.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
    Said, CM ; Delahunt, M ; Hardidge, A ; Smith, P ; Tran, P ; McDonald, L ; Kefalianos, E ; Daniel, C ; Berney, S (BMC, 2021-06-29)
    BACKGROUND: Early mobilization after surgery is a key recommendation for people with hip fracture, however this is achieved by only 50% of people. Recumbent bike riding has been used in other populations with limited mobility and has potential to allow early exercise in people post hip fracture. The primary aim of this pilot trial was to demonstrate the feasibility of a trial protocol designed to determine the effect of early post-operative cycling in bed on outcomes in people with hip fracture. METHODS: Single-blinded, multi-site randomized controlled pilot trial. Fifty-one people with hip fracture were recruited within 4 days of surgery from two sites in Victoria. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either usual care (n = 25) or usual care plus active cycling in bed (n = 26). The cycling intervention was delivered on weekdays until the participant could walk 15 m with assistance of one person. The primary outcomes were trial feasibility and safety. Clinical outcomes, including mobility (Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale) and delirium were measured at day seven post-operatively and at hospital discharge by an assessor blinded to group. Additional outcomes at discharge included gait speed, cognition and quality of life. RESULTS: The intervention was safe, feasible and acceptable to patients and staff. Delivery of the intervention was ceased on (median) day 9.5 (IQR 7, 12); 73% of scheduled sessions were delivered; (median) 4 sessions (IQR 2.0, 5.5) were delivered per participant with (median) 9 min 34 s (IQR 04:39, 17:34) of active cycling per session. The trial protocol was feasible, however at day seven 75% of participants had not met the criterion (able to walk 15 m with assistance of one person) to cease the cycling intervention.. CONCLUSION: In bed cycling is feasible post-operatively following hip fracture, however seven days post-operatively is too early to evaluate the impact of the cycling intervention as many participants were still receiving the intervention. A fully powered RCT to explore the effectiveness and cost efficiency of this novel intervention is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered (25/09/2017) with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTR N12617001345370 .
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Psychological well-being of Australian hospital clinical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Holton, S ; Wynter, K ; Trueman, M ; Bruce, S ; Sweeney, S ; Crowe, S ; Dabscheck, A ; Eleftheriou, P ; Booth, S ; Hitch, D ; Said, CM ; Haines, KJ ; Rasmussen, B (CSIRO PUBLISHING, 2021)
    Objective This study assessed the psychological well-being of Australian hospital clinical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted in a large metropolitan tertiary health service located in Melbourne, Australia. The survey was completed by nurses, midwives, doctors and allied health (AH) staff between 15 May and 10 June 2020. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 items (DASS-21) assessed the psychological well-being of respondents in the previous week. Results In all, 668 people responded to the survey (nurses/midwives, n=391; doctors, n=138; AH staff, n=139). Of these, 108 (16.2%) had direct contact with people with a COVID-19 diagnosis. Approximately one-quarter of respondents reported symptoms of psychological distress. Between 11% (AH staff) and 29% (nurses/midwives) had anxiety scores in the mild to extremely severe ranges. Nurses and midwives had significantly higher anxiety scores than doctors (P<0.001) and AH staff (P<0.001). Direct contact with people with a COVID-19 diagnosis (P<0.001) and being a nurse or midwife (P<0.001) were associated with higher anxiety scores. Higher ratings of the health service's pandemic response and staff support strategies were protective against depression (P<0.001), anxiety (P<0.05) and stress (P<0.001). Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant effect on the psychological well-being of hospital clinical staff, particularly nurses and midwives. Staff would benefit from (additional) targeted supportive interventions during the current and future outbreaks of infectious diseases. What is known about the topic? The outbreak of COVID-19 is having, and will have, a considerable effect on health services. No Australian data about the effect of COVID-19 on the psychological well-being of hospital clinical staff are available. What does this paper add? Australia healthcare providers have experienced considerable emotional distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly nurses and midwives and clinical staff who have had direct contact with people with a COVID-19 diagnosis. In this study, nurses and midwives had significantly higher levels of anxiety, depression and stress during the pandemic than general Australian adult population norms, and significantly more severe anxiety symptoms than medical and AH staff. Despite a lower number of COVID-19 cases and a lower death rate than in other countries, the proportion of Australian hospital clinical staff experiencing distress is similar to that found in other countries. What are the implications for practitioners? Targeted well-being interventions are required to support hospital clinical staff during the current and future outbreaks of infectious diseases and other 'crises' or adverse events.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Factors associated with improved walking in older people during hospital rehabilitation: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
    Said, CM ; McGinley, JL ; Szoeke, C ; Workman, B ; Hill, KD ; Wittwer, JE ; Woodward, M ; Liew, D ; Churilov, L ; Bernhardt, J ; Morris, ME (BMC, 2021-01-31)
    BACKGROUND: Older people are often admitted for rehabilitation to improve walking, yet not everyone improves. The aim of this study was to determine key factors associated with a positive response to hospital-based rehabilitation in older people. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis from a multisite randomized controlled trial. Older people (n= 198, median age 80.9 years, IQR 76.6- 87.2) who were admitted to geriatric rehabilitation wards with a goal to improve walking were recruited. Participants were randomized to receive additional daily physical therapy focused on mobility (n = 99), or additional social activities (n = 99). Self-selected gait speed was measured on admission and discharge. Four participants withdrew. People who changed gait speed ≥0.1 m/s were classified as 'responders' (n = 130); those that changed <0.1m/s were classified as 'non-responders' (n = 64). Multivariable logistic regression explored the association of six pre-selected participant factors (age, baseline ambulation status, frailty, co-morbidities, cognition, depression) and two therapy factors (daily supervised upright activity time, rehabilitation days) and response. RESULTS: Responding to rehabilitation was associated with the number of days in rehabilitation (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08; p = .039) and higher Mini Mental State Examination scores (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.14; p = .048). No other factors were found to have association with responding to rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: In older people with complex health problems or multi-morbidities, better cognition and a longer stay in rehabilitation were associated with a positive improvement in walking speed. Further research to explore who best responds to hospital-based rehabilitation and what interventions improve rehabilitation outcomes is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000884707; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01910740 .
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Feasibility of Using Foot-Ground Clearance Biofeedback Training in Treadmill Walking for Post-Stroke Gait Rehabilitation
    Nagano, H ; Said, CM ; James, L ; Begg, RK (MDPI, 2020-12)
    Hemiplegic stroke often impairs gait and increases falls risk during rehabilitation. Tripping is the leading cause of falls, but the risk can be reduced by increasing vertical swing foot clearance, particularly at the mid-swing phase event, minimum foot clearance (MFC). Based on previous reports, real-time biofeedback training may increase MFC. Six post-stroke individuals undertook eight biofeedback training sessions over a month, in which an infrared marker attached to the front part of the shoe was tracked in real-time, showing vertical swing foot motion on a monitor installed in front of the subject during treadmill walking. A target increased MFC range was determined, and participants were instructed to control their MFC within the safe range. Gait assessment was conducted three times: Baseline, Post-training and one month from the final biofeedback training session. In addition to MFC, step length, step width, double support time and foot contact angle were measured. After biofeedback training, increased MFC with a trend of reduced step-to-step variability was observed. Correlation analysis revealed that MFC height of the unaffected limb had interlinks with step length and ankle angle. In contrast, for the affected limb, step width variability and MFC height were positively correlated. The current pilot-study suggested that biofeedback gait training may reduce tripping falls for post-stroke individuals.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Factors Impacting Early Mobilization Following Hip Fracture: An Observational Study
    Said, CM ; Delahunt, M ; Ciavarella, V ; Al Maliki, D ; Boys, A-M ; Vogrin, S ; Berney, S (Wolters Kluwer, 2021-04)
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hip fracture guidelines emphasize mobilization within 48 hours of surgery. The aims of this audit were to determine the proportion of patients with hip fracture who mobilize within 48 hours, identify factors associated with delayed mobilization, and identify barriers to mobilization. METHODS: Single-site prospective audit of 100 consecutive patients (age 82 ± 9 years) admitted for surgical management of hip fracture. Data collected included time to mobilization, factors that may impact mobilization (age, weight-bearing status, additional injuries, premorbid mobility status, time to surgery, dementia, delirium, and postoperative complications), and barriers to mobilization as identified by the physical therapist. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Mobilization within 48 hours of surgery was achieved by 43% of patients. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated odds of mobilizing early increased with higher New Mobility Scores, representing better premorbid mobility (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.60); odds reduced if delirium was present on day 1 or 2 (OR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.79). New Mobility Scores 5 or more, which indicate independent premorbid mobility inside and outside the house, best predicted early mobilization in patients who did not develop delirium. No cutoff score was identified for those with delirium. Identified barriers to mobilization included patient confusion, manual handling risk, patient declined, and hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of this cohort achieved the guideline of mobilization within 48 hours of surgery. Patients who develop delirium within the first 2 days of surgery or who had premorbid mobility limitation were less likely to mobilize. Identification of patients likely to have delayed mobilization will assist physical therapists with delivering appropriate management to patients with hip fracture during their acute hospital stay.