Physiotherapy - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Self-reported knee joint instability is related to passive mechanical stiffness in medial knee osteoarthritis
    Creaby, MW ; Wrigley, TV ; Lim, B-W ; Hinman, RS ; Bryant, AL ; Bennell, KL (BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 2013-11-20)
    BACKGROUND: Self-reported knee joint instability compromises function in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis and may be related to impaired joint mechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between self-reported instability and the passive varus-valgus mechanical behaviour of the medial osteoarthritis knee. METHODS: Passive varus-valgus angular laxity and stiffness were assessed using a modified isokinetic dynamometer in 73 participants with medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. All participants self-reported the absence or presence of knee instability symptoms and the degree to which instability affected daily activity on a 6-point likert scale. RESULTS: Forward linear regression modelling identified a significant inverse relationship between passive mid-range knee stiffness and symptoms of knee instability (r = 0.27; P < 0.05): reduced stiffness was indicative of more severe instability symptoms. Angular laxity and end-range stiffness were not related to instability symptoms (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Conceivably, a stiffer passive system may contribute toward greater joint stability during functional activities. Importantly however, net joint stiffness is influenced by both active and passive stiffness, and thus the active neuromuscular system may compensate for reduced passive stiffness in order to maintain joint stability. Future work is merited to examine the role of active stiffness in symptomatic joint stability.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis
    Dobson, F ; Hinman, RS ; Roos, EM ; Abbott, JH ; Stratford, P ; Davis, AM ; Buchbinder, R ; Snyder-Mackler, L ; Henrotin, Y ; Thumboo, J ; Hansen, P ; Bennell, KL (ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2013-08)
    OBJECTIVES: To recommend a consensus-derived set of performance-based tests of physical function for use in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) or following joint replacement. METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary expert advisory group was established to guide the study. Potential tests for consideration in the recommended set were identified via a survey of selected experts and through a systematic review of the measurement properties for performance-based tests. A multi-phase, consensus-based approach was used to prioritize and select performance-based tests by applying decision analysis methodology (1000Minds software) via online decision surveys. The recommended tests were chosen based on available measurement-property evidence, feasibility of the tests, scoring methods and expert consensus. RESULTS: Consensus incorporated the opinions of 138 experienced clinicians and researchers from 16 countries. The five tests recommended by the advisory group and endorsed by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) were the 30-s chair-stand test, 40 m fast-paced walk test, a stair-climb test, timed up-and-go test and 6-min walk test. The first three were recommended as the minimal core set of performance-based tests for hip or knee OA. CONCLUSION: The OARSI recommended set of performance-based tests of physical function represents the tests of typical activities relevant to individuals diagnosed with hip or knee OA and following joint replacements. These tests are complementary to patient-reported measures and are recommended as prospective outcome measures in future OA research and to assist decision-making in clinical practice. Further research should be directed to expanding the measurement-property evidence of the recommended tests.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Medial arch supports do not significantly alter the knee adduction moment in people with knee osteoarthritis
    Hinman, RS ; Bardin, L ; Simic, M ; Bennell, KL (ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2013-01)
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of medial arch supports on indices of medial knee joint load (the peak external knee adduction moment (KAM) and knee adduction angular (KAA) impulse) and knee pain during walking in people with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Twenty-one people with medial compartment OA underwent gait analysis in standardised athletic shoes wearing (1) no medial arch supports and (2) prefabricated medial arch supports, in random order. Outcomes were the first and second peaks in the external KAM, the KAA impulse and severity of knee pain during testing. Outcomes were compared across conditions using paired t tests (gait data) and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test (pain data). RESULTS: There were no significant changes in either first or second peak KAM, or in the KAA impulse, with the addition of medial arch supports (all P > 0.05). Considerable individual variation in response to the arch supports was observed across participants. There was no immediate change in knee pain during walking when medial arch supports were worn (P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no mean change in any of the measured indices of medial knee load with medial arch supports. No immediate changes in knee pain were evident.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Sagittal plane joint loading is related to knee flexion in osteoarthritic gait
    Creaby, MW ; Hunt, MA ; Hinman, RS ; Bennell, KL (ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2013-10)
    BACKGROUND: High mechanical loading has been consistently linked with medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, and is considered to play a central role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Evidence from healthy adults indicates that knee flexion kinematics may influence knee load. The purpose of this study therefore, was to investigate the association between knee flexion kinematics and indicators of joint loading during walking (peak moments and vertical ground reaction force), in individuals with medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 89 participants with painful medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis completed three-dimensional walking gait analysis to measure stance phase ground reaction forces, knee joint moments, and knee flexion kinematics. FINDINGS: In stepwise regression, greater knee flexion excursion was associated with higher peak vertical ground reaction force, accounting for 10% of its variance (B=0.62 [95% CI 0.34, 0.89], P<0.001). Greater peak knee flexion was associated with a higher flexion moment, accounting for 44% of its variance (B=0.12 [95% CI 0.09, 0.15], P<0.001). No association was found between the knee adduction moment and knee flexion kinematics during walking. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that greater knee flexion is associated with higher joint loads in the sagittal plane (i.e. a higher peak knee flexion moment). However, knee flexion kinematics were not associated with the knee adduction moment - a proxy measure of medial compartment knee load. Thus, high knee flexion should be considered an undesirable gait characteristic with respect to knee load in individuals with medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.