Physiotherapy - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12
-
ItemNo Preview Available
-
ItemMuscle Forces during Weight-Bearing Exercises in Medial Knee Osteoarthritis and Varus Malalignment: A Cross-Sectional Study(LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2022-09)PURPOSE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that common weight-bearing exercises generate higher lower-limb muscle forces but do not increase medial tibiofemoral contact force (MTCF) when compared with walking in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants 50 yr or older with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment were recruited from the community. Three-dimensional lower-body motion, ground reaction forces, and surface EMG from 12 lower-limb muscles were acquired during five squat, lunge, single-leg heel raise, and walking trials, performed at self-selected speeds. An EMG-informed neuromusculoskeletal model with subject-specific bone geometry was used to estimate muscle forces (N) and body weight (BW)-normalized MTCF. The peak forces for muscle groups (knee extensors, knee flexors, ankle plantar flexors, and hip abductors) and peak MTCF were compared with walking using a multivariate analysis of variance model. RESULTS: There was a significant main effect ( P < 0.001). Post hoc tests (mean difference (95% confidence intervals)) showed that, compared with walking, participants generated higher peak knee extensor and flexor forces during squatting (extensor: 902 N (576 to 1227 N), flexor: 192 N (9.39 to 375 N)) and lunging (extensor: 917 N (604 to 1231 N), flexor: 496 N (198 to 794 N)), and lower peak hip abductor force during squatting (-1975 N (-2841 to -1108 N)) and heel raises (-1217 N (-2131 to -303 N)). Compared with walking, MTCF was lower during squatting (-0.79 BW (-1.04 to -0.53 BW)) and heel raises (-0.27 BW (-0.50 to -0.04 BW)). No other significant differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Participants generated higher peak knee flexor and extensor forces during squatting and lunging but did not increase peak MTCF compared with walking. Clinicians can use these findings to reassure themselves and patients that weight-bearing exercises in these positions do not adversely increase forces within the osteoarthritic joint compartment.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableEffect of functional weightbearing versus non-weightbearing quadriceps strengthening exercise on contact force in varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial(ELSEVIER, 2022-12)BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis progression may be related to altered knee loads, particularly in those with varus malalignment. Using randomized controlled trial data, this secondary analysis of complete datasets (n = 67) compared the effects of a functional weightbearing (WB) and non-weightbearing quadriceps strengthening exercise (NWB) program on measures of medial tibiofemoral joint contact force (MTCF) during walking. METHODS: Participants aged ≥50 years and with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment were randomly allocated to a 12-week, home-based, physiotherapist-prescribed exercise program comprised of WB exercises (n = 31), or NWB exercise (n = 36). Three-dimensional lower-body motion, ground reaction forces, and surface electromyograms from six lower-limb muscles were acquired during walking at baseline and at 12-weeks follow-up. An electromyogram-informed neuromusculoskeletal model estimated bodyweight (BW) normalized MTCF (peak and impulse), including external and muscular contributions to MTCF. RESULTS: There was no between-group difference in the change in peak MTCF (-0.02 [-0.12, 0.09] BW) or MTCF impulse (-0.01 [-0.06, 0.03] BW·s). There was a between-group difference in the muscle contribution to peak MTCF (-0.08 [-0.15, -0.00] BW) and MTCF impulse (-0.04 [-0.08, -0.00] BW·s), whereby the muscle contribution reduced more in the NWB group over time compared to the WB group. There was also a between group-difference in the external contribution to peak MTCF (0.09 [0.01, 0.18] BW), but this reduced more in the WB group than in the NWB group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest no difference in MTCF between the two exercise programs, but differences in the contribution to MTCF between the two exercise programs were observed in those with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableWalking-related knee contact forces and associations with knee pain across people with mild, moderate and severe radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study(ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2022-06)OBJECTIVE: To investigate knee contact forces (KCFs), and their relationships with knee pain, across grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) severity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional exploratory analysis of 164 participants with medial knee OA. Radiographic severity was classified as mild (grade 2), moderate (grade 3) or severe (grade 4) using the Kellgren & Lawrence (KL) scale. Walking knee pain was assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale. External knee adduction moment (external KAM) and internal muscle forces were used to calculate medial, lateral and total KCFs using a musculoskeletal computational model. Force-time series across stance phase of gait were compared across KL grades using Statistical Parametric Mapping. Associations between KCFs and pain across KL grades were assessed using linear models. RESULTS: Medial KCFs during early and middle stance were higher in participants with KL3 and KL4 compared to those with KL2. In contrast, lateral KCFs were higher in those with KL2 compared to KL3 and KL4 in middle to late stance. The external loading component (i.e., KAM) of the medial KCF during middle to late stance was also greater in participants with KL3 and KL4 compared to those with KL2, whereas the internal (i.e., muscle) component was greater in those with KL3 and KL4 compared to KL3 during early stance. There were no associations between medial KCF and knee pain in any KL grade. CONCLUSIONS: Medial and lateral KCFs differ between mild, moderate and severe radiographic knee OA but are not associated with knee pain severity for any radiographic OA grade.
-
Item
-
ItemTibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study(PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2022)OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of stable supportive to flat flexible walking shoes on medial tibiofemoral contact force (MTCF) in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. DESIGN: This was a randomized cross-over study. Twenty-eight participants aged ≥50 years with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment were recruited from the community. Three-dimensional full-body motion, ground reaction forces and surface electromyograms from twelve lower-limb muscles were acquired during six speed-matched walking trials for flat flexible and stable supportive shoes, tested in random order. An electromyogram-informed neuromusculoskeletal model with subject-specific geometry estimated bodyweight (BW) normalized MTCF. Waveforms were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping with a repeated measures analysis of variance model. Peak MTCF, MTCF impulse and MTCF loading rates (discrete outcomes) were evaluated using a repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance model. RESULTS: Statistical parametric mapping showed lower MTCF in stable supportive compared to flat flexible shoes during 5-18% of stance phase (p = 0.001). For the discrete outcomes, peak MTCF and MTCF impulse were not different between the shoe styles. However, mean differences [95%CI] in loading impulse (-0.02 BW·s [-0.02, 0.01], p<0.001), mean loading rate (-1.42 BW·s-1 [-2.39, -0.45], p = 0.01) and max loading rate (-3.26 BW·s-1 [-5.94, -0.59], p = 0.02) indicated lower measure of loading in stable supportive shoes compared to flexible shoes. CONCLUSIONS: Stable supportive shoes reduced MTCF during loading stance and reduced loading impulse/rates compared to flat flexible shoes and therefore may be more suitable in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (12619000622101).
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableFeasibility of personalised hip load modification using real-time biofeedback in hip osteoarthritis: A pilot study.(Elsevier BV, 2022-03)OBJECTIVE: (i) Compare the feasibility of three load modification strategies to immediately increase hip contact force in people with hip osteoarthritis (OA) using real-time visual biofeedback during walking, and (ii) prospectively evaluate changes in pain and physical function following 6-weeks of walking using a prescribed personalised load modification strategy. DESIGN: Twenty participants with symptomatic mild-to-moderate hip OA walked on an instrumented treadmill while motion capture and electromyographic data were recorded (normal walk), then under three conditions: (i)neutral trunk lean; (ii)neutral pelvic obliquity; (iii)increased step length. The biomechanical parameter of interest and corresponding target value were displayed in real-time. Hip contact forces were subsequently computed using a calibrated electromyography-informed neuromusculoskeletal model. A decision tree was used to prescribe a personalised load modification strategy to each participant for integration into walking over 6-weeks. RESULTS: Only the step length modification significantly increased peak hip contact force compared to normal walking when performed by all participants (11.34 [95%CI 4.54,18.13]%, P < 0.01). After participants were prescribed a personalised load modification strategy, both neutral pelvis (n = 5, 11.88[95%CI -0.49,24.24]%) and step length (n = 10, 12.79[95%CI 0.49,25.09]%) subgroups increased peak hip contact force >10%. After 6-weeks, 77% and 46% of participants reported a clinically important improvement in hip pain during walking and physical function, respectively. CONCLUSION: Most participants with hip OA could immediately increase hip contact force through personalised movement retraining by a magnitude estimated to promote cartilage heath and reported an improvement in symptoms after 6-weeks. Findings provide preliminary support for a personalised load modification-based intervention for hip OA.
-
ItemEffects of adding aerobic physical activity to strengthening exercise on hip osteoarthritis symptoms: protocol for the PHOENIX randomised controlled trial(BMC, 2022-04-18)BACKGROUND: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of musculoskeletal pain. Exercise is a core recommended treatment. Most evidence is based on muscle-strengthening exercise, but aerobic physical activity has potential to enhance clinical benefits. The primary aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that adding aerobic physical activity to a muscle strengthening exercise leads to significantly greater reduction in hip pain and improvements in physical function, compared to a lower-limb muscle strengthening exercise program alone at 3 months. METHODS: This is a superiority, 2-group, parallel randomised controlled trial including 196 people with symptomatic hip OA from the community. Following baseline assessment, participants are randomly allocated to receive either i) aerobic physical activity and muscle strengthening exercise or; ii) muscle strengthening exercise only. Participants in both groups receive 9 consultations with a physiotherapist over 3 months. Both groups receive a progressive muscle strengthening exercise program in addition to advice about OA management. The aerobic physical activity plan includes a prescription of moderate intensity aerobic physical activity with a goal of attaining 150 min per week. Primary outcomes are self-reported hip pain assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = 'no pain' and 10 = 'worst pain possible') and self-reported physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index physical function subscale) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include other measures of self-reported pain (assessed at 0, 3, 9 months), self-reported physical function (assessed at 0, 3, 9 months), performance-based physical function (assessed at 0, 3 months), joint stiffness (assessed at 0, 3, 9 months), quality of life (assessed at 0, 3, 9 months), muscle strength (assessed at 0, 3 months), and cardiorespiratory fitness (assessed at 0, 3 months). Other measures include adverse events, co-interventions, and adherence. Measures of body composition, serum inflammatory biomarkers, quantitative sensory measures, anxiety, depression, fear of movement and self-efficacy are included to explore causal mechanisms. DISCUSSION: Findings will assist to provide an evidence-based recommendation regarding the additional effect of aerobic physical activity to lower-limb muscle strengthening on hip OA pain and physical function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry reference: ACTRN 12619001297112. Registered 20th September 2019.
-
ItemEffects of adding a diet intervention to exercise on hip osteoarthritis pain: protocol for the ECHO randomized controlled trial(BMC, 2022-03-05)BACKGROUND: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of musculoskeletal pain. Exercise is a core recommended treatment. Despite some clinical guidelines also recommending weight loss for hip OA, there is no evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCT) to substantiate these recommendations. This superiority, 2-group, parallel RCT will compare a combined diet and exercise program to an exercise only program, over 6 months. METHODS: One hundred people with symptomatic and radiographic hip OA will be recruited from the community. Following baseline assessment, participants will be randomly allocated to either, i) diet and exercise or; ii) exercise only. Participants in the diet and exercise group will have six consultations with a dietitian and five consultations with a physiotherapist via videoconferencing over 6 months. The exercise only group will have five consultations with a physiotherapist via videoconferencing over 6 months. The exercise program for both groups will include prescription of strengthening exercise and a physical activity plan, advice about OA management and additional educational resources. The diet intervention includes prescription of a ketogenic very low-calorie diet with meal replacements and educational resources to support weight loss and healthy eating. Primary outcome is self-reported hip pain via an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = 'no pain' and 10 = 'worst pain possible') at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include self-reported body weight (at 0, 6 and 12 months) and body mass index (at 0, 6 and 12 months), visceral fat (measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at 0 and 6 months), pain, physical function, quality of life (all measured using subscales of the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale at 0, 6 and 12 months), and change in pain and physical activity (measured using 7-point global rating of change Likert scale at 6 and 12 months). Additional measures include adherence, adverse events and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether a diet intervention in addition to exercise provides greater hip pain-relief, compared to exercise alone. Findings will assist clinicians in providing evidence-based advice regarding the effect of a dietary intervention on hip OA pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov . Identifier: NCT04825483 . Registered 31st March 2021.
-
ItemHow do middle-aged and older adults with chronic hip pain view their health problem and its care? A protocol for a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis(BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2021-11)INTRODUCTION: Chronic hip pain in middle-aged and older adults is common and disabling. Patient-centred care of chronic hip pain requires a comprehensive understanding of how people with chronic hip pain view their health problem and its care. This paper outlines a protocol to synthesise qualitative evidence of middle-aged and older adults' views, beliefs, expectations and preferences about their chronic hip pain and its care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a qualitative evidence synthesis using a framework approach. We will conduct this study in accord with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the synthesis of Qualitative research checklist. We will search MEDLINE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and PsycINFO using a comprehensive search strategy. A priori selection criteria include qualitative studies involving samples with a mean age over 45 and where 80% or more have chronic hip pain. Two or more reviewers will independently screen studies for eligibility, assess methodological strengths and limitations using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative studies checklist, perform data extraction and synthesis and determine ratings of confidence in each review finding using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach. Data extraction and synthesis will be guided by the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation. All authors will contribute to interpreting, refining and finalising review findings. This protocol is registered on PROSPERO and reported according to the PRISMA Statement for Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review as primary data will not be collected. The findings of the review will be disseminated through publication in an academic journal and scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021246305.