Surgery (St Vincent's) - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4
-
ItemPredicting the prognosis of undifferentiated pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma: a 20-year experience of 266 cases(WILEY, 2019-09)BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is a rare malignant tumour of mesenchymal origin, which was conceived following re-classification of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). The objective of this study is to determine prognostic factors for the outcome of UPS, following multi-modal treatment. METHODS: Data of UPS tumours from 1996 to 2016 were collected, totalling 266 unique UPS patients. Median follow-up was 7.8 years. All tumours were retrospectively analysed for prognostic factors of the disease, including local recurrence (LR) and metastatic disease (MD) at diagnosis, tumour size, grade, location and depth, patient age, adjuvant therapy and surgical margin. Overall survival (OS), post-treatment LR and metastatic-free survival were assessed as outcomes. RESULTS: The 5- and 10-year OS rates for all ages were 60% and 48%, respectively, with a median survival time of 10.1 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that the adverse prognostic factors associated with decreased OS were older age (P < 0.001; hazard ratio 1.03) and MD at diagnosis (P = 0.001; 2.89), with upper extremity tumours being favourable (P = 0.043; 2.30). Poor prognosis for post-operative LR was associated with older age (P = 0.046; 1.03) and positive surgical margins (P = 0.028; 2.68). Increased post-treatment MD was seen in patients with large tumours (5-9 cm (P < 0.001; 4.42), ≥10 cm (P < 0.001; 6.80)) and MD at diagnosis (P < 0.001; 3.99), adjuvant therapy was favourable, shown to reduce MD (P < 0.001; 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: UPS is a high-grade soft tissue sarcoma, for which surgery striving for negative margins, with radiotherapy, is the treatment of choice. Older age, lower extremity location, MD at presentation, large size and positive surgical margins, were unfavourable.
-
ItemMulticentre randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial of combination vancomycin and cefazolin surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: the Australian surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (ASAP) trial(BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2019-11)INTRODUCTION: Resistant Gram-positive organisms, such as methicillin-resistant staphylococci, account for a significant proportion of infections following joint replacement surgery. Current surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines recommend the use of first-generation or second-generation cephalosporin antibiotics, such as cefazolin. Cefazolin, however, does not prevent infections due to these resistant organisms; therefore, new prevention strategies need to be examined. One proposed strategy is to combine a glycopeptide antibiotic with cefazolin for prophylaxis. The clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of this combination therapy compared with usual therapy, however, have not been established. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised, double-blind, parallel, superiority, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial will compare the incidence of all surgical site infections (SSIs) including superficial, deep and organ/space (prosthetic joint) infections, safety and cost-effectiveness of surgical prophylaxis with cefazolin plus vancomycin to that with cefazolin plus placebo. The study will be performed in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery. In the microbiological sub-studies, we will examine the incidence of SSIs in participants with preoperative staphylococci colonisation (Sub-Study 1) and incidence of VRE acquisition (Sub-Study 2). The trial will recruit 4450 participants over a 4-year period across 13 orthopaedic centres in Australia. The primary outcome is the incidence of SSI at 90 days post index surgery. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of SSI according to joint and microorganism and other healthcare associated infections. Safety endpoints include the incidence of acute kidney injury, hypersensitivity reactions and all-cause mortality. The primary and secondary analysis will be a modified intention-to-treat analysis consisting of all randomised participants who undergo eligible surgery. We will also perform a per-protocol analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by The Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/Alfred/102) on 9 July 2018. Study findings will be disseminated in the printed media, and learnt forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618000642280.
-
ItemPatient-related risk factors for unplanned 30-day readmission following total knee arthroplasty: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis(BMC, 2019-08-22)BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition as well as a growing global health problem, and total knee arthroplasty is an effective treatment for advanced stages of disease. Unplanned 30-day hospital readmission is an indicator of complications, which is a significant financial burden on healthcare systems. The objective is to perform a systematic review of patient-related factors associated with unplanned 30-day readmission following total knee arthroplasty. This information will inform future strategies to improve health outcomes after knee arthroplasty surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE will be systematically searched using a comprehensive search strategy. Studies of higher quality than case series will be included, in order to optimise the quality of the findings of this review. We will include studies reporting on patient-related risk factors for unplanned 30-day readmission following primary or revision total knee arthroplasty for any indication. Case series will be excluded, as will studies reporting exclusively on intraoperative, clinician, hospital, and health system risk factors. The reference lists of selected papers will then be screened for any additional literature. Two reviewers will independently apply stringent eligibility criteria to titles, abstracts, and full texts of studies identified in the literature search. They will then extract data from the final list of selected papers according to an agreed-upon taxonomy and vocabulary of the data to be extracted. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence will then take place. Finally, the effect size of each identified risk factor will be determined; meta-analysis will be performed where adequate data is available. DISCUSSION: The findings of this review and subsequent meta-analysis will aid clinicians as they seek to understand the risk factors for 30-day readmission following total knee arthroplasty. Clinicians and patients will be able to use this information to align expectations of the postoperative course, which will enhance the recovery process, and aid in the development of strategies to mitigate identified risks. Another purpose of this review is to assist policy-makers in developing quality indicators for care and provide insights into the drivers of health costs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019118154.
-
ItemThe effect of mindfulness training prior to total joint arthroplasty on postoperative pain and physical function: A randomised controlled trial(CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE, 2019-10)OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) in improving pain and physical function following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). DESIGN: Two-group, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted between September 2012 and May 2017. SETTING: Single centre study conducted at a University-affiliated, tertiary hospital. INTERVENTION: People with arthritis scheduled for TJA, with a well-being score <40 (Short Form-12 Survey) were randomly allocated to a pre-surgery eight-week MBSR program or treatment as usual (TAU). OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported joint pain and function at 12 months post-surgery, assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes were knee stiffness and global improvement (WOMAC); physical and psychological well-being (Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey); self-efficacy (Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale); and mindfulness (5-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire). RESULTS: 127 participants were randomised; 65 to MBSR and 62 to TAU, of which 45 participants allocated to the intervention and 56 participants allocated to usual care proceeded to surgery and 100 (99%) completed primary outcome measures. Greater improvements in knee pain (mean difference, -10.3 points, 95% CI -19.0 to -1.6; P = 0.021) and function (mean difference, -10.2 points, 95% CI -19.2 to -1.3; P = 0.025) at 12 months post-surgery were observed in the MBSR group compared to the TAU group. A between group difference in global scores (-9.5 points, 95% CI -17.9 to -1.1; P = 0.027) was also observed. No other differences in secondary outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION: MBSR improves post-surgery pain and function in people with psychological distress undergoing TJA. Further research is required to examine potential barriers to broader implementation and uptake.