Surgery (St Vincent's) - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Reply to Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer - a systematic review
    Waters, PS ; Cheung, FP ; Peacock, O ; Warrier, SK ; Heriot, AG ; O'Riordain, DS ; Pillinger, S ; Lynch, AC ; Stevenson, ARL (WILEY, 2020-04)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer - a systematic review
    Waters, PS ; Cheung, FP ; Peacock, O ; Heriot, AG ; Warrier, SK ; O'Riordain, DS ; Pillinger, S ; Lynch, AC ; Stevenson, ARL (WILEY, 2020-05)
    AIM: Minimally invasive surgical approaches for cancer of the right colon have been well described with significant patient and equivalent oncological benefits. Robotic surgery has advanced in its ability to provide multi-quadrant abdominal access, leading the surgical community to widen its application outside of the pelvis to other abdominal compartments. Globally it is being realized that a patient's surgical episode of care is becoming the epicentre of cancer treatment. In order to establish the role of robotic surgery in a patient's episode of care, 'successful patient-oriented surgical' parameters in right hemicolectomy for malignancy were measured. The objective was to examine the rates of successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic right hemicolectomy (RRH) compared to laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) for cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid: 1946-present), PubMed (NCBI), Embase (Ovid: 1966-present) and Cochrane Library was conducted using PRISMA for parameters of successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in RRH and LRH for malignancy alone. The parameters measured included postoperative ileus, anastomotic complication, surgical wound infection, length of stay (LOS), incisional hernia rate, conversion to open, margin status, lymph node harvest and overall morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: There were 15 studies which included 831 RRH patients and 3241 LRH patients, with a median age of 62-74 years. No study analysed the concept of successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative ileus, with less time to first flatus in RRH (2.0-2.7 days, compared with 2.5-4.0 days, P < 0.05). Anastomotic leak rate in one study reported a significant increase in LRH compared to RRH (P < 0.05, 0% vs 8.3%). Significantly decreased LOS following RRH was outlined in six studies. One study reported a significantly higher rate of incisional hernias following LRH with extracorporeal anastomoses compared to RRH with intracorporeal anastomoses. Overall rates of conversion to open surgery were less with RRH (0%-3.9% vs 0%-18%, P < 0.001, 0.05). One study outlined significantly higher rates of incomplete resection with an open right hemicolectomy compared with minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic resections, with positive margin rates of 2.3%, 0.9% and 0% respectively (P < 0.001). Two studies reported significantly higher lymph node harvest in RRH (P < 0.05). Overall morbidity and 30-day mortality were comparable in both approaches. CONCLUSION: Thirty-day morbidity and mortality were comparable between the two approaches, with patients undergoing RRH having lower anastomotic complications, increased lymph node harvest, and reduced LOS, conversion to open and incisional hernia rates in a number of studies. There are limited data on surgical approach and impact on quality of life and what patients deem successful surgical outcomes. There is a further need for a randomized controlled trial examining successful patient-oriented outcomes in right hemicolectomy for malignancy.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Management of primary and metastatic malignant small bowel obstruction, operate or palliate. A systematic review
    Banting, SP ; Waters, PS ; Peacock, O ; Narasimhan, V ; Lynch, AC ; McCormick, JJ ; Warrier, SK ; Heriot, AG (WILEY, 2021-03)
    BACKGROUND: The management of patients presenting with malignant small bowel obstruction is a challenging paradigm. The aim of this systematic review was to examine different management strategies in these complex patients. The primary outcomes evaluated were the type of intervention, 30-day morbidity and mortality and overall survival rates. METHODS: A systematic literature review of EMBase, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Library was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for studies reporting on conservative and operative management of malignant small bowel obstruction. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (n = 882 patients) reporting on outcomes for malignant small bowel obstruction were analysed. Outcomes measured were primarily survival and relief of obstructive symptoms. The median age ranged from 52 to 66 years. The most common cause of malignant small bowel obstruction was gynaecological in nature (56%), followed by colorectal (19%). Four hundred and eighty-six patients underwent primary surgical management and the remaining 396 patients were assigned to non-surgical intervention. Median overall survival in the operative studies ranged from 2.5 to 7.4 months compared with 0.9 to 1.9 months (P < 0.05). The 30-day mortality ranged from 13% to 28% in those who underwent surgical interventions versus 2% to 61% in the non-surgical group (P = 0.09). No significant difference in median survival in gastrointestinal (GI) and gynaecological malignancies was observed (4.3 versus 5.0 months, P = 0.12). Morbidity ranged from 21% to 85% in the surgical group and 12% to 29% in the percutaneous groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention in malignant small bowel obstruction is associated with significant morbidity, although it may improve survival in selected patients with gynaecological and colorectal malignancy. It is imperative that realistic goals and expectations are discussed with patients preoperatively.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Abdominoperineal excision in Australasia: clinical outcomes, predictive factors and recent trends of nonrestorative rectal cancer surgery
    Smith, N ; Waters, PS ; Peacock, O ; Kong, JC ; Lynch, AC ; McCormick, JJ ; Heriot, A ; Warrier, SK (WILEY, 2020-11)
    AIM: The decision to perform an abdominoperineal excision (APR) rather than restorative bowel resection relies on a number of clinical factors. There remains great variability in APR rates internationally. The aim of this study was to demonstrate trends of APR surgery in low rectal cancer (< 6 cm from the anal verge) in Australasia and identify predictors of nonrestoration. METHOD: This study reviewed a prospectively maintained colorectal registry - the Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) - from general/colorectal surgical units across Australia and New Zealand. Data were analysed to determine factors predictive of nonrestorative resection. Patients were analysed based on the presence (control) or absence (comparison) of a primary anastomosis. RESULTS: Of 3628 patients with rectal cancer, 2096 were diagnosed with low rectal cancer between 2007 and 2017. The incidence of APR remained constant over the study period, with 58% of all resections of low rectal cancer being APR. The majority of resections were performed by consultants in urban hospitals (86% vs 14%). Tumours ≤ 3 cm from the anal verge, T4, M1 disease and neoadjuvant therapy were the greatest predictors of APR (P < 0.001). A significantly increased rate of restorative surgery was observed in public hospital settings (59% vs 41%, P < 0.05). The rate of positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) was 7.95%, with significantly increased rates in patients undergoing APR (12.2% vs 6.2%, P < 0.001). CRM positivity was increased in open approaches, T4, N2 and M1 staged disease and in an emergency/urgent setting (P < 0.001 and P < 0.045, respectively). Significantly increased wound and pulmonary complications were observed in the APR cohort (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The rates of APR in Australia and New Zealand remain high but are comparable to international figures, with one-third of rectal cancers being treated by APR. The main determinants of APR are tumour height, T stage and neoadjuvant therapy requirement. CRM positivity was higher in APR patients.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Predicting outcomes of pelvic exenteration using machine learning
    Dudurych, I ; Kelly, ME ; Aalbers, AGJ ; Aziz, NA ; Abecasis, N ; Abraham-Nordling, M ; Akiyoshi, T ; Alberda, W ; Albert, M ; Andric, M ; Angenete, E ; Antoniou, A ; Auer, R ; Austin, KK ; Aziz, O ; Baker, RP ; Bali, M ; Baseckas, G ; Bebington, B ; Bedford, M ; Bednarski, BK ; Beets, GL ; Berg, PL ; Beynon, J ; Biondo, S ; Boyle, K ; Bordeianou, L ; Bremers, AB ; Brunner, M ; Buchwald, P ; Bui, A ; Burgess, A ; Burger, JWA ; Burling, D ; Burns, E ; Campain, N ; Carvalhal, S ; Castro, L ; Caycedo-Marulanda, A ; Chan, KKL ; Chang, GJ ; Chew, MH ; Chok, AK ; Chong, P ; Christensen, HK ; Clouston, H ; Codd, M ; Collins, D ; Colquhoun, AJ ; Corr, A ; Coscia, M ; Coyne, PE ; Creavin, B ; Croner, RS ; Damjanovic, L ; Daniels, IR ; Davies, M ; Davies, RJ ; Delaney, CP ; de Wilt, JHW ; Denost, Q ; Deutsch, C ; Dietz, D ; Domingo, S ; Dozois, EJ ; Duff, M ; Eglinton, T ; Enrique-Navascues, JM ; Espin-Basany, E ; Evans, MD ; Fearnhead, NS ; Flatmark, K ; Fleming, F ; Frizelle, FA ; Gallego, MA ; Garcia-Granero, E ; Garcia-Sabrido, JL ; Gentilini, L ; George, ML ; George, V ; Ghouti, L ; Giner, F ; Ginther, N ; Glynn, R ; Golda, T ; Griffiths, B ; Harris, DA ; Hagemans, JAW ; Hanchanale, V ; Harji, DP ; Helewa, RM ; Heriot, AG ; Hochman, D ; Hohenberger, W ; Holm, T ; Hompes, R ; Jenkins, JT ; Kaffenberger, S ; Kandaswamy, GV ; Kapur, S ; Kanemitsu, Y ; Kelley, SR ; Keller, DS ; Khan, MS ; Kiran, RP ; Kim, H ; Kim, HJ ; Koh, CE ; Kok, NFM ; Kokelaar, R ; Kontovounisios, C ; Kristensen, HO ; Kroon, HM ; Kusters, M ; Lago, V ; Larsen, SG ; Larson, DW ; Law, WL ; Laurberg, S ; Lee, PJ ; Limbert, M ; Lydrup, ML ; Lyons, A ; Lynch, AC ; Mantyh, C ; Mathis, KL ; Margues, CFS ; Martling, A ; Meijerink, WJHJ ; Merkel, S ; Mehta, AM ; McArthur, DR ; McDermott, FD ; McGrath, JS ; Malde, S ; Mirnezami, A ; Monson, JRT ; Morton, JR ; Mullaney, TG ; Negoi, I ; Neto, JWM ; Nguyen, B ; Nielsen, MB ; Nieuwenhuijzen, GAP ; Nilsson, PJ ; Oliver, A ; O'Connell, PR ; O'Dwyer, ST ; Palmer, G ; Pappou, E ; Park, J ; Patsouras, D ; Pellino, G ; Peterson, AC ; Poggioli, G ; Proud, D ; Quinn, M ; Quyn, A ; Radwan, RW ; Rasheed, S ; Rasmussen, PC ; Regenbogen, SE ; Renehan, A ; Rocha, R ; Rochester, M ; Rohila, J ; Rothbarth, J ; Rottoli, M ; Roxburgh, C ; Rutten, HJT ; Ryan, EJ ; Safar, B ; Sagar, PM ; Sahai, A ; Saklani, A ; Sammour, T ; Sayyed, R ; Schizas, AMP ; Schwarzkopf, E ; Scripcariu, V ; Selvasekar, C ; Shaikh, I ; Shellawell, G ; Shida, D ; Simpson, A ; Smart, NJ ; Smart, P ; Smith, JJ ; Solbakken, AM ; Solomon, MJ ; Sorensen, MM ; Steele, SR ; Steffens, D ; Stitzenberg, K ; Stocchi, L ; Stylianides, NA ; Swartling, T ; Sumrien, H ; Sutton, PA ; Swartking, T ; Tan, EJ ; Taylor, C ; Tekkis, PP ; Teras, J ; Thurairaja, R ; Toh, EL ; Tsarkov, P ; Tsukada, Y ; Tsukamoto, S ; Tuech, JJ ; Turner, WH ; Tuynman, JB ; van Ramshorst, GH ; van Zoggel, D ; Vasquez-Jimenez, W ; Verhoef, C ; Vizzielli, G ; Voogt, ELK ; Uehara, K ; Wakeman, C ; Warrier, S ; Wasmuth, HH ; Weber, K ; Weiser, MR ; Wheeler, JMD ; Wild, J ; Wilson, M ; Wolthuis, A ; Yano, H ; Yip, B ; Yip, J ; Yoo, RN ; Winter, DC (WILEY, 2020-12)
    AIM: We aim to compare machine learning with neural network performance in predicting R0 resection (R0), length of stay > 14 days (LOS), major complication rates at 30 days postoperatively (COMP) and survival greater than 1 year (SURV) for patients having pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. METHOD: A deep learning computer was built and the programming environment was established. The PelvEx Collaborative database was used which contains anonymized data on patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or locally recurrent colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2014. Logistic regression, a support vector machine and an artificial neural network (ANN) were trained. Twenty per cent of the data were used as a test set for calculating prediction accuracy for R0, LOS, COMP and SURV. Model performance was measured by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). RESULTS: Machine learning models and ANNs were trained on 1147 cases. The AUROC for all outcome predictions ranged from 0.608 to 0.793 indicating modest to moderate predictive ability. The models performed best at predicting LOS > 14 days with an AUROC of 0.793 using preoperative and operative data. Visualized logistic regression model weights indicate a varying impact of variables on the outcome in question. CONCLUSION: This paper highlights the potential for predictive modelling of large international databases. Current data allow moderate predictive ability of both complex ANNs and more classic methods.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery - technical, oncological and patient outcomes from a single institution
    Baker, EJ ; Waters, PS ; Peacock, O ; Narasimhan, V ; Larach, T ; McCormick, J ; Heriot, AG ; Warrier, S ; Lynch, C (WILEY, 2020-10)
    AIM: Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) is gaining traction around the globe as an alternative to laparoscopic conventional TAMIS for local excision of benign and early malignant rectal lesions. The aim was to analyse patient and oncological outcomes of R-TAMIS for consecutive cases in a single centre. METHODS: A prospective analysis of consecutive R-TAMIS procedures over a 12-month period was performed. Data were collated from hospital databases and theatre registers. RESULTS: Eleven patients (six men, five women), mean age 69.81 years (51-92 years), underwent R-TAMIS over 12 months utilizing a da Vinci Xi platform. The mean lesion size was 36 mm (20-60 mm) with a mean distance from the anal verge of 7.5 cm (3-14 cm). Five lesions were posterior in anatomical location, four anterior, one right lateral and one left lateral. All procedures were performed in the lithotomy position using a GelPOINT Path Platform. Mean operative time was 64 min (40-100 min). Complete resection was achieved in 10/11 patients with two patients being upgraded to a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Nine patients were diagnosed with dysplastic lesions. Four patients had a false positive diagnosis of an invasive tumour on MRI. Six patients required suturing for full-thickness resections. One patient had a postoperative bleed requiring repeat endoscopy and clipping. One patient (full-thickness resection of T3 tumour) proceeded to a formal resection without difficulty with no residual disease (T0N0, 0/22). One patient with a fully resected T2 tumour is undergoing a surveillance protocol. The mean length of stay was 1 day with two patients having a length of stay of 2 days and one patient of 4 days. CONCLUSION: R-TAMIS could potentially represent a safe novel approach for local resection of rectal lesions.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection for primary rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: results from the PelvEx Collaborative
    Kelly, ME ; Aalbers, AGJ ; Aziz, NA ; Abecasis, N ; Abraham-Nordling, M ; Akiyoshi, T ; Alberda, W ; Albert, M ; Andric, M ; Angenete, E ; Antoniou, A ; Auer, R ; Austin, KK ; Aziz, O ; Baker, RP ; Bali, M ; Baseckas, G ; Bebington, B ; Bednarski, BK ; Beets, GL ; Berg, PL ; Beynon, J ; Biondo, S ; Boyle, K ; Bordeianou, L ; Bremers, AB ; Brunner, M ; Buchwald, P ; Bui, A ; Burgess, A ; Burger, JWA ; Burling, D ; Burns, E ; Campain, N ; Carvalhal, S ; Castro, L ; Caycedo-Marulanda, A ; Chan, KKL ; Chew, GJH ; Chong, PC ; Christensen, HK ; Clouston, H ; Codd, M ; Coffins, D ; Colquhoun, AJ ; Corr, A ; Coscia, M ; Coyne, PE ; Creavin, B ; Croner, RS ; Damjanovic, L ; Daniels, R ; Davies, M ; Davies, RJ ; Delaney, CP ; Denost, Q ; Deutsch, C ; Dietz, D ; Domingo, S ; Dozois, EJ ; Duff, M ; Eglinton, T ; Enrique-Navascues, JM ; Espin-Basany, E ; Evans, MD ; Fearnhead, NS ; Flatmark, K ; Fleming, F ; Frizelle, FA ; Gallego, MA ; Garcia-Granero, E ; Garcia-Sabrido, JL ; Gentilini, L ; George, ML ; Ghouti, L ; Giner, F ; Ginther, N ; Glynn, R ; Golda, T ; Griffiths, B ; Harris, DA ; Hagemans, JAW ; Hanchanale, V ; Harji, DP ; Helewa, RM ; Heriot, AG ; Hochman, D ; Hohenberger, W ; Holm, T ; Hompes, R ; Jenkins, JT ; Kaffenberger, S ; Kandaswamy, G ; Kapur, S ; Kanemitsu, Y ; Kelley, SR ; Keller, DS ; Khan, MS ; Kiran, RP ; Kim, H ; Kim, HJ ; Koh, CE ; Kok, NFM ; Kokelaar, R ; Kontovounisios, C ; Kristensen, HO ; Kroon, HM ; Kusters, M ; Lago, V ; Larsen, SG ; Larson, DW ; Law, WL ; Laurberg, S ; Lee, PJ ; Limbert, M ; Lydrup, ML ; Lyons, A ; Lynch, AC ; Mantyh, C ; Mathis, KL ; Margues, CFS ; Martling, A ; Meijerink, WJHJ ; Merkel, S ; Mehta, AM ; McArthur, DR ; McDermott, FD ; McGrath, JS ; Malde, S ; Mimezami, A ; Monson, JRT ; Morton, JR ; Mullaney, TG ; Negoi, I ; Neto, JWM ; Nguyen, B ; Nielsen, MB ; Nieuwenhuijzen, GAP ; Nilsson, PJ ; O'Connell, PR ; O'Dwyer, ST ; Palmer, G ; Pappou, E ; Park, J ; Patsouras, D ; Pellino, G ; Peterson, AC ; Poggioli, G ; Proud, D ; Quinn, M ; Quyn, A ; Radwan, RW ; van Ramshorst, GH ; Rasheed, S ; Rasmussen, PC ; Regenbogen, SE ; Renehan, A ; Rocha, R ; Rochester, M ; Rohila, J ; Rothbarth, J ; Rottoli, M ; Roxburgh, C ; Rutten, HJT ; Ryan, EJ ; Safar, B ; Sagar, PM ; Sahai, A ; Saklani, A ; Sammour, T ; Sayyed, R ; Schizas, AMP ; Schwarzkopf, E ; Scripcariu, V ; Selvasekar, C ; Shaikh, I ; Hellawell, G ; Shida, D ; Simpson, A ; Smart, NJ ; Smart, P ; Smith, JJ ; Solbakken, AM ; Solomon, MJ ; Sorensen, MM ; Steele, SR ; Steffens, D ; Stitzenberg, K ; Stocchi, L ; Stylianides, NA ; Sumrien, H ; Sutton, PA ; Swanking, T ; Taylor, C ; Tekkis, PP ; Teras, J ; Thurairaja, R ; Toh, EL ; Tsarkov, P ; Tsukada, Y ; Tsukamoto, S ; Tuech, JJ ; Turner, WH ; Tuynman, JB ; Vasquez-Jimenez, W ; Verhoef, C ; Vizzielli, G ; Voogt, ELK ; Uehara, K ; Wakeman, C ; Warner, S ; Wasmuth, HH ; Weber, K ; Weiser, MR ; Wheeler, JMD ; Wild, J ; Wilson, M ; de Wilt, JHW ; Wolthuis, A ; Yano, H ; Yip, B ; Yip, J ; Yoo, RN ; van Zoggel, D ; Winter, DC (WILEY, 2020-10)
    AIM: At presentation, 15-20% of patients with rectal cancer already have synchronous liver metastases. The aim of this study was to determine the surgical and survival outcomes in patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent combined pelvic exenteration and liver (oligometastatic) resection. METHOD: Data from 20 international institutions that performed simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection between 2007 and 2017 were accumulated. Primarily, we examined perioperative outcomes, morbidity and mortality. We also assessed the impact that margin status had on survival. RESULTS: Of 128 patients, 72 (56.2%) were men with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR) 15 years]. The median size of the liver oligometastatic deposits was 2 cm (IQR 1.8 cm). The median duration of surgery was 406 min (IQR 240 min), with a median blood loss of 1090 ml (IQR 2010 ml). A negative resection margin (R0 resection) was achieved in 73.5% of pelvic exenterations and 66.4% of liver resections. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.6%, and 32% of patients had a major postoperative complication. The 5-year overall survival for patients in whom an R0 resection of both primary and metastatic disease was achieved was 54.6% compared with 20% for those with an R1/R2 resection (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection is feasible, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Simultaneous resection should only be performed where an R0 resection of both pelvic and hepatic disease is anticipated.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Management strategies for patients with advanced rectal cancer and liver metastases using modified Delphi methodology: results from the PelvEx Collaborative.
    PelvEx Collaborative, (Wiley, 2020-09)
    AIM: A total of 15-20% of patients with rectal cancer have liver metastases on presentation. The management of these patients is controversial. Heterogeneity in management strategies is considerable, with management often being dependent on local resources and available expertise. METHOD: Members of the PelvEx Collaborative were invited to participate in the generation of a consensus statement on the optimal management of patients with advanced rectal cancer with liver involvement. Fifteen statements were created for topical discussion on diagnostic and management issues. Panellists were asked to vote on statements and anonymous feedback was given. A collaborative meeting was used to discuss any nuances and clarify any obscurity. Consensus was considered when > 85% agreement on a statement was achieved. RESULTS: A total of 135 participants were involved in the final round of the Delphi questionnaire. Nine of the 15 statements reached consensus regarding the management of patients with advanced rectal cancer and oligometastatic liver disease. Routine use of liver MRI was not recommended for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, unless there was concern for metastatic disease on initial computed tomography staging scan. Induction chemotherapy was advocated as first-line treatment in those with synchronous liver metastases in locally advanced rectal cancer. In the presence of symptomatic primary disease, a diverting stoma may be required to facilitate induction chemotherapy. Overall, only one-quarter of the panellists would consider simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection. CONCLUSION: This Delphi process highlights the diverse treatment of advanced rectal cancer with liver metastases and provides recommendations from an experienced international group regarding the multidisciplinary management approach.