Surgery (St Vincent's) - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8
-
ItemMalignant melanoma of the pleura(WILEY, 2017-03)
-
ItemImpact of sex on prognostic host factors in surgical patients with lung cancer(WILEY, 2017-12)BACKGROUND: Lung cancer has markedly poorer survival in men. Recognized important prognostic factors are divided into host, tumour and environmental factors. Traditional staging systems that use only tumour factors to predict prognosis are of limited accuracy. By examining sex-based patterns of disease-specific survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients, we determined the effect of sex on the prognostic value of additional host factors. METHODS: Two cohorts of patients treated surgically with curative intent between 2000 and 2009 were utilized. The primary cohort was from Melbourne, Australia, with an independent validation set from the American Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate analyses of validated host-related prognostic factors were performed in both cohorts to investigate the differences in survival between men and women. RESULTS: The Melbourne cohort had 605 patients (61% men) and SEER cohort comprised 55 681 patients (51% men). Disease-specific 5-year survival showed men had statistically significant poorer survival in both cohorts (P < 0.001); Melbourne men at 53.2% compared with women at 68.3%, and SEER 53.3% men and 62.0% women were alive at 5 years. Being male was independently prognostic for disease-specific mortality in the Melbourne cohort after adjustment for ethnicity, smoking history, performance status, age, pathological stage and histology (hazard ratio = 1.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.16, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in non-small cell lung cancer are important irrespective of age, ethnicity, smoking, performance status and tumour, node and metastasis stage. Epidemiological findings such as these should be translated into research and clinical paradigms to determine the factors that influence the survival disadvantage experienced by men.
-
ItemOutcomes following resection of non-small cell lung cancer in octogenarians(WILEY, 2018-12)BACKGROUND: The treatment of choice for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgical resection. Little is known about the short- and long-term outcomes among very elderly patients. We sought to determine predictors of short- and long-term survival among octogenarians undergoing curative-intent resection for NSCLC in Victoria, Australia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from all patients aged ≥80 years who underwent curative-intent resection for NSCLC over 12 years (January 2005-December 2016) across five tertiary centres. We examined effect of age, stage of disease, extent of surgery and lung function on short- and long-term survival. RESULTS: Two hundred patients aged ≥80 years underwent curative-intent resections. Mortality at 30 and 120 days was 2.9% and 5.9%, respectively. Increased early mortality was observed among those ≥83 years, at 30 days (6.8% versus 0.8%, P = 0.044) and 120 days (12.2% versus 2.3%, P = 0.0096). Early mortality was highest among patients ≥83 years requiring lobectomy, compared to sub-lobar resection at 120 days (17% versus 3.8%, P = 0.019). Long-term survival was predicted by age and stage of disease. Among patients with Stage I disease aged <83 years, lobectomy was associated with superior 5-year survival, compared to sub-lobar resection (83% versus 61%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In carefully selected elderly patients undergoing curative-intent resection of early stage NSCLC, both short- and long-term outcomes appear consistent with younger historical cohorts. Early mortality was associated with lobectomy in those with advanced age. Older patients undergoing lobectomy appeared to be at highest risk for early mortality, while younger patients with Stage I disease undergoing at least lobectomy appear to have the best long-term survival.
-
ItemPulmonary metastasectomy: analysis of survival and prognostic factors in 243 patients(WILEY, 2018-12)BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastases are a sign of advanced malignant disease. Interdisciplinary management of metastatic cancer mandates the consideration of all treatment options, and in selected patients pulmonary metastasectomy can be performed with curative intent. This study aims to analyze the prognostic factors associated with survival and optimize the selection of surgical candidates. The sarcoma subset analysis aims to examine the role of multiple repeat resections for pulmonary metastatic recurrence. METHODS: A total of 243 patients were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate analyses with log-rank tests and multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazards model were undertaken to determine the independent prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses identified germ cell cancer (P = 0.01) and a disease-free interval of >36 months (P = 0.006) as significant independent prognostic factors for improved survival, whilst synchronous metastases (P = 0.04), multiple metastases (P = 0.005) and incomplete resection (P < 0.001) were identified as significantly poor prognostic factors. Subset analyses identified that ≥2 repeat resections within the sarcoma cohort was associated with an increased median survival of 63.5 months (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In selected patients, pulmonary metastasectomy can be performed with curative intent and have associated long-term survival benefits. Patients presenting with recurrent sarcoma pulmonary metastases should be considered for repeat metastasectomy.
-
ItemNo Preview AvailableSurgical Management of Chest Wall Sarcomas(Springer, 2021)
-
ItemDieulafoy's disease of the bronchus: a rare cause of massive hemoptysis.(Wiley, 2014-06)We present the case of a 30-year-old non-smoker who presented with unexplained, massive hemoptysis and was diagnosed with a rare vascular malformation.
-
ItemThe Past, Present and Future of Pulmonary Metastasectomy: A Review Article(Int Acad Publishing Co Ltd, 2019)Pulmonary metastases are a sign of advanced malignancy and an omen of poor prognosis. Once primary tumors metastasize, they become notoriously difficult to treat and interdisciplinary management often involves a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. Over the last 25 years, the emerging body of evidence has recognized the curative potential of pulmonary metastasectomy. Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases is now commonly considered for patients with controlled primary disease, absence of widely disseminated extrapulmonary disease, completely resectable lung metastases, sufficient cardiopulmonary reserve, and lack of a better alternative systemic therapy. Since the development of these selection criteria, other prognostic factors have been proposed to better predict survival and optimize the selection of surgical candidates. Disease-free interval (DFI), completeness of resection, surgical approach, number and laterality of lung metastases, and lymph node metastases all play a dynamic role in determining patient outcomes. There is a definite need to continue reviewing these prognosticators to identify patients who will benefit most from pulmonary metastasectomy and those who should avoid unnecessary loss of lung parenchyma. This literature review aims to explore and synthesize the last 25 years of evidence on the long-term survival, prognostic factors, and patient selection process for pulmonary metastasectomy.
-
ItemMapping of actionable mutations to histologic subtype domains in lung adenocarcinoma: implications for precision medicine(Impact Journals, 2014-03-22)Precision medicine depends on the accurate identification of actionable mutations in a tumor sample. It is unknown how heterogeneous the distribution of such mutations can be in a tumor. Morphological (i.e. histopathological) heterogeneity is well described in lung adenocarcinoma and has been specifically recognized in the most recent official clinico-pathological classification. The most predominant subtype present is now used to classify each lung adenocarcinoma. No molecular profile exists to explain the intratumoral differences in lung adenocarcinoma morphology, despite the consistently observed association between specific predominant subtypes and poorer survival. Given a recent proposal stratifying lung adenocarcinoma into subtypes of differing metastatic potential, we questioned the assumption that major mutations are present uniformly throughout tumors; especially those showing discrete different subtypes. We selected formalin-fixed paraffin embedded lung adenocarcinoma specimens that showed discrete areas of different subtypes, extracted subtype DNA samples from those areas and screened for mutations in hotspot regions of the EGFR, KRAS and BRAF genes using high resolution melting. Sanger sequencing was used to confirm all identified mutations. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) was used to identify mutant allele specific imbalances in tumors with EGFR mutations. Interestingly, we found that KRAS and BRAF mutations could be confined to morphological domains of higher grade. On the other hand, EGFR mutations were found through all histological subtypes in each tumor consistent with the driver status of this mutation. Intratumoral heterogeneity has major implications for tumorigenesis, chemoresistance and the role of histopathology in molecular screening for precision medicine. This study not only confirms that intratumoral mutational heterogeneity does occur, but also that it is associated with morphologically distinct regions in some tumors. From a practical perspective, small biopsies may not adequately represent a tumor’s full mutational profile, particularly for later arising but prognostically important mutations such as those in the KRAS and BRAF genes.