Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9
-
ItemThe perception of electrodes by cochlear implant patients who became deaf early in life [Abstract]( 1994)Two separate studies measuring the perception of differences in site of electrode stimulation were conducted with cochlear implant patients who became deaf early in life. The multiple-electrode prosthesis manufactured by Cochlear Pty. Limited was used. Two of the possible mechanisms for the discrimination of different electrodes are pitch and loudness. The first study measured the discrimination of different electrodes using two procedures which minimised the influences of loudness cues on performance. In the first procedure, the stimulation patterns were symmetric sweeps across electrodes. The reference stimuli were apical-basal trajectories and the comparison stimuli were basal-apical trajectories. The electric stimulation levels were the same in the reference and comparison stimuli because the same electrodes were used in the trajectories. In the second procedure, the stimulation patterns used randomised variations in electric stimulation levels on the different electrodes. By randomly varying the loudness of the stimuli in a discrimination task, the patient is required to listen for more salient cues such as pitch. Both procedures gave comparable results. The second study was concerned with the estimation of order in percepts for stimulation on the different electrodes along the array which was related to the tonotopic order of the cochlea. Approximately half of the early-deafened patients tested revealed a tonotopic order in percepts which was comparable to that obtained from postlinguistically deafened adults.
-
ItemPitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis( 1994)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemCochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception( 1992)A group of 10 children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults were implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Ply Ltd) at the University of Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic and have used the prosthesis for periods from 12 to 65 months. Postoperative performance on the majority of closed-set speech perception tests was significantly greater than chance, and significantly better than preoperative performance for all of the patients. Five of the children have achieved substantial scores on open-set speech tests using hearing without lipreading. Phoneme scores in monosyllabic words ranged from 30% to 72%; word scores in sentences ranged from 26% to 74%. Four of these 5 children were implanted during preadolescence (aged 5:5 to 10:2 years) and the fifth, who had a progressive loss, was implanted during adolescence (aged 14:8 years). The duration of profound deafness before implantation varied from 2 to 8 years. Improvements were also noted over postoperative data collection times for the younger children. The remaining 5 patients who did not demonstrate open-set recognition were implanted after a longer duration of profound deafness (aged 13:11to 20:1 years). The results are discussed with reference to variables that may affect implant performance, such as age at onset of loss, duration of profound loss, age at implantation, and duration of implantation. They are compared with results for similar groups of children using hearing aids and cochlear implants.
-
ItemPerceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills( 1988)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemThe University of Melbourne/Nucleus cochlear prosthesis( 1988)This is a review of research to develop the University of Melbourne/Nucleus cochlear prosthesis for patients with a profound-total hearing loss. A more complete review can be obtained in Clark et al. A prototype receiver-stimulator and multiple-electrode array developed at the University of Melbourne was first implanted in a postlingually deaf adult patient with a profound-total hearing loss on 1 August 1978. A speech processing strategy which could help this patient understand running speech, especially when combined with lipreading was developed in 1978 following initial psychophysical studies. A prototype wearable speech processor was fabricated in 1979, that could provide significant help for the first two patients in understanding running speech when used in combination with lipreading compared with lipreading alone, and it also enabled them to understand some running speech when using electrical stimulation alone. An implantable receiver-stimulator and wearable speech processor embodying the principles of the prototype devices were then produced for clinical trial by the Australian biomedical firm, Nucleus Ltd, and its subsidiaries, Cochlear Pty Ltd and Cochlear Corporation. This cochlear implant was initially clinically trialled on six patients at The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital in 1982, and shown to give similar results to those obtained with the prototype device. In view of these findings a clinical trial was carried out for a Premarket Approval Application to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and extended to a number of centres in the US, Canada, and West Germany. This clinical trial confirmed that patients could understand running speech when electrical stimulation was combined with lipreading, and that some patients could also understand running speech when using electrical stimulation alone. Today, more than 600 patients world-wide are using cochlear implants developed from the research described in this paper.
-
ItemUnderlying structure of auditory-visual consonant perception by hearing-impaired children and the influences of syllabic compression( 1988)The identification of consonants in /a/-C-/a/ nonsense syllables, using a fourteen-alternative forced-choice procedure, was examined in 4 profoundly hearing-impaired children under five conditions: audition alone using hearing aids in free-field (A), vision alone (V), auditory-visual using hearing aids in free-field (AV1), auditory-visual with linear amplification (AV2), and auditory-visual with syllabic compression (AV3). In the AV2 and AV3 conditions, acoustic signals were binaurally presented by magnetic or acoustic coupling to the subjects' hearing aids. The syllabic compressor had a compression ratio of 10:1, and attack and release times were 1.2 ms and 60 ms. The confusion matrices were subjected to two analysis methods: hierarchical clustering and information transmission analysis using articulatory features. The same general conclusions were drawn on the basis of results obtained from either analysis method. The results indicated better performance in the V condition than in the A condition. In the three AV conditions, the subjects predominately combined the acoustic parameter of voicing with the visual signal. No consistent differences were recorded across the three AV conditions. Syllabic compression did not, therefore, appear to have a significant influence on AV perception for these children. A high degree of subject variability was recorded for the A and three AV conditions, but not for the V condition.
-
ItemAudiological assessment of profoundly hearing-impaired children( 1987)The design of an audiological assessment protocol for profoundly hearing-impaired children may be divided into three areas. First, accurate estimation of hearing loss includes the behavioral measures of unaided and aided thresholds and the objective measures of electrocochleography and auditory brain stem response. The reliability of these measures for the accurate diagnosis of a profound to total hearing loss is discussed. Second, speech perception includes the measure of perception in the audition alone, vision alone, and audition plus vision conditions. Test material should include speech features, words, and sentences. Factors influencing the choice of material are the developmental age of the child, the method of educational instruction, speech and language skills, and vocabulary limits. Third, psychophysical properties of residual auditory skills include measures such as frequency, intensity, and duration difference limens. These skills may be compared to those elicited through other sensory channels, such as visual and tactile. Other important factors that should be considered are the psychological well-being of the child and family, family motivations and expectations, and educational requirements.
-
ItemUnderlying dimensions and individual differences in auditory, visual, and auditory-visual vowel perception by hearing-impaired children( 1984)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemResults for the Nucleus multiple-electrode cochlear implant in two children [Abstract]( 1988)Two males, 9 years 10 months (CHILD 1) and 5 years 5 months (CHILD 2) at time of surgery, were implanted with the Nucleus multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Both patients were deafened as a result of meningitis in their third year. Assessments of speech perception, speech production and language skills were undertaken at regular intervals, pre and post operatively. For both patients in the audition alone condition, some speech perception post operative scores were significantly higher than pre operative scores and progressive improvements in scores over successive post operative data collection times were seen. Significant differences between the visual alone and auditory-visual condition scores were also observed for CHILD 1 post operatively. Speech production post operative scores were significantly higher than pre operative scores for both patients. The receptive vocabulary scores for both patients improved at a higher rate than that of age-matched normal children. The acquisition of expressive and receptive language skills for CHILD 2 was at a higher rate than that of age-matched children. Differences in the results between the two patients were seen, and this may be related to age and duration of deafness.