Graeme Clark Collection

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants
    Sarant, JZ ; Blamey, PJ ; Dowell, RC ; Clark, GM ; Gibson, WPR (LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2001-02)
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify common factors affecting speech perception scores in children with cochlear implants. DESIGN: Speech perception data for 167 implanted children were collected at two cochlear implant centres in Melbourne and Sydney. The data comprised audition-alone scores on open-set word and sentence tests. Children were selected on the basis that they had a Nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant. The average age of the children was 5 yr. Information was also collected about 12 factors that may have influenced speech perception scores for each child. Analysis of covariance was used to identify factors that significantly affected speech perception scores. Pearson pairwise correlation coefficients were also calculated for all factors analyzed. RESULTS: The analyses in this study identified factors that accounted for 51%, 34%, and 45% of the variance in phoneme, word and sentence perception scores. Scores decreased by 1.4 to 2.4% per year of profound deafness prior to implantation. Children who normally use oral communication scored significantly higher than children normally using sign or simultaneous oral and sign communication. Children implanted in Sydney scored higher on average than children implanted in Melbourne. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that a significant part of the variation in speech perception scores is systematically related to audiological and environmental factors for each child. The reasons for significant differences between children using different communication modes or from different clinics were not identified.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception in implanted children: effects of speech processing strategy and residual hearing
    Meskin, T. ; Rance, G. ; Cody, K. ; Sarant, J. ; Larratt, M. ; Latus, K. ; Hollow, R. ; Rehn, C. ; Dowell, R.C. ; Pyman, B. ; Gibson, W.P.R. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Cowan, Robert S. C. ; Barker, E. J. ; Pegg, P. ; Dettman, S. ; Rennie, M. ; Galvin, K. (Mendoza Editor, 1997)
    The ability of implanted children to adapt to different speech processing strategies has been demonstrated for the Nucleus implant system. Children previously experienced with the Multipeak speech processing strategy. were able to gain significant improvements in consonant, word and sentence perception using the Speak speech processing strategy. suggesting some degree of neural plasticity in neural-auditory coding. Of 192 implanted children with different degrees of preoperative residual hearing, 65% were found to obtain significant scores on open-set speech materials using electrical stimulation alone. Those children with more residual hearing had a greater probability of achieving open-set understanding and at a minimum level, perceived high frequency consonant information which would not have been available through conventional hearing aids.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception benefits for children using the 22-channel Melbourne/cochlear hearing prosthesis [Abstract]
    Sarant, J.Z. ; Hollow, P.W. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Dowell, Richard C. ; Cowan, Robert S.C. ; Pyman, B. C. ; Dettman, S. J. ; RANCE, GARY ; Barker, Elizabeth J. ( 1993)
    In 1985; the first child was implanted with the Cochlear 22-channel cochlear prosthesis at the University of Melbourne Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital Cochlear Implant Clinic. There are now 42 children who have received the device in Melbourne. Analysis of patient details for these children show a very heterogeneous group, with a wide range in age, hearing thresholds, duration of deafness and aetiology. The major aetiologies found were either a congenital profound deafness.; or a hearing loss due to meningitis. In all but 3 cases, the children are using 15 or more electrodes in the array. Speech perception benefits have been analyzed according to a six-level hierarchical classification scheme. All of-the children achieved a minimum benefit of discrimination of suprasegmental information (Category 2), and 59% of the children achieved open-set understanding of unfamiliar speech material without the aid of lip-reading (Categories 5 & 6). Detailed analysis suggests that the majority of children achieving open-set speech perception benefits had more than one year of experience with their implant. and less than seven years of profound deafness prior to implantation.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Factors associated with open-set speech perception in children using the Cochlear multiple-channel prosthesis [Abstract]
    Yaremko, R. ; Rance, G. ; Sarant, Julia Z. ; Dawson, Pam W. ; Gibson, William P.R. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Dowell, Richard C. ; Cowan, Robert S.C. ; Brown, Catherine D. ; Dettman, Shani J. ; Barker, Jane ; Barker, Elizabeth J. ( 1993)
    Since 1985, nearly 100 children have received the 22-channel cochlear prosthesis from the Melbourne and Sydney cochlear implant clinics. These two clinics account for the bulk of casesin Australia, and have similar management philosophies and selection criteria. The patient population represents a variety of etiologies, and ranges in age from 2 - 18 years of age. Bothcongenital and postlinguistic hearing losses are included. In order to assess benefit to speech perception in such a diverse group, the children's results have been tabulated according to a six level hierarchical scale of speech perception achievement. The scale ranges from category I,detection of sound only, to category 6, which includes significant perception scores for open-setwords and sentences. Analysis of the results shows that the majority of the children are achieving open-set speech perception benefits, and that results continue to improve with additional experience with their devices. There are a number of contributing factors to these open-set speech� perception results which have impact both on selection issues and on habilitation with different age ranges �of patients.