Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5
-
ItemThe progress of children using the multichannel cochlear implant in Melbourne( 1995)Multi-channel cochlear implantation in children began in Australia in 1985 and there are now close to 4000 profoundly deaf children and adolescents using the Australian implant system around the world. The aim of the implant procedure is to provide adequate hearing for speech and language development through auditory input. This contrasts with the situation for adults with acquired deafness where the cochlear implant aims to restore hearing for someone with well-developed auditory processing and language skills. As with adults, results vary over a wide range for children using the Multi-channel implant. Many factors have been suggested that may contribute to differences in speech perception for implanted children. In an attempt to better understand these factors, the speech perception results for children implanted in Melbourne were reviewed and subjected to statistical analysis. This has indicated that the amount of experience with the implant and the length of sensory deprivation are strongly correlated with perceptual results. This means that younger children are likely to perform better with an implant and that a number of years of experience are required for children to reach their full potential. The results have also indicated that educational placement and management play a crucial role in children reaching their potential. Overall, 60% of the children and adolescents in the study have reached a level of open-set speech understanding using the cochlear implant without lipreading.
-
ItemChronic middle ear disease and cochlear implantation( 1995)Profound or total hearing loss can occur in the setting of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), either coincidentally or secondary to the disease process. Obviously, inserting a foreign body through a potentially infected field into a space that communicates intracranially presents a challenging management problem. This paper presents the experience from the Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic (CIC) in implanting patients with bilateral CSOM. This is certainly not a common problem, as there have been only 3 cases from 121 implanted adults. However, we feel that it is an important issue with potentially devastating consequences. In addition, there are many countries in which bilateral CSOM is a more common problem and cause of profound or total hearing loss.
-
ItemThe development of the Melbourne/Cochlear multiple-channel cochlear implant for profoundly deaf children( 1992)In 1978-79, a speech processing strategy which extracted the voicing (FO) and second formant (F2) frequencies and presented these as rate and place of stimulation respectively to residual auditory nerve fibres was developed for the University of Melbourne's prototype multiple-channel receiver-stimulator (Clark et aI1977, Clark et a11978, Tong et aI1980). This speech processing strategy was shown to provide post linguistically deaf adults with some open-set speech comprehension using electrical stimulation alone, and considerable help when used in combination with lipreading (Clark et al 1981).
-
ItemSurgical complications with the cochlear multiple-channel intracochlear implant: experience at Hannover and Melbourne( 1991)The surgical complications for the first 153 multi-channel cochlear implant operations carried out at the Medizinische Hochschule in Hannover and the first 100 operations at The University of Melbourne Clinic, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, are presented. In the Hannover experience the major complications were wound breakdown, wound infection, electrode tie erosion through the external auditory canal, electrode slippage, a persistent increase in tinnitus, and facial nerve stimulation. The incidence of wound breakdown requiring removal of the package was 0.6% in Hannover and 1.0% in Melbourne. The complications for the operation at both clinics were at acceptable levels. It was considered that wound breakdown requiring implant removal could be kept to a minimum by making a generous incision and suturing the flap without tension.
-
ItemRevised selection criteria for the multiple-channel cochlear implant( 1991)The criteria of suitability for a cochlear implant have been extended from total deafness to include some individuals with residual hearing. The aim of the initial hearing evaluation is to define whether the speech discrimination is good enough to justify perseverance with a hearing aid. In adults, usually the pure tone audiogram and speech audiometry are accurate and consistent. In children, however, to achieve accuracy, free field testing must be complemented by repeated aided conditioned responses and objective evoked response audiometry. When a child has residual hearing it is more difficult to assess the potential for habilitation using an aid. For both adults and children, it is necessary to make a selection from a battery of tests on the basis of the subjects experience. This development highlights the need for otologists and audiologists to become familiar with the battery of tests used in evaluating severe deafness (Plant 1984) and to review decisions made about the management of people with severe to total deafness. In suitable people, the aim of treatment with the Cochlear multichannel implant and its multipeak speech processor is a significant score for open set speech discrimination tests using hearing alone. This cannot always be achieved but as long as the evaluation protocol has been used to warn patients before the operation, they will be satisfied with a result where the implant complements lip reading resulting in discrimination of running speech and detection of environmental sounds.