Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 33
-
ItemSpatial representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of neonatally deafened kittens following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve [Abstract]( 1995)The orderly tonotopic representation of the cochlea is accurately reproduced within the central auditory system of normal hearing animals. Any degradation of this representation as a result of a neonatal hearing loss or chronic electrical stimulation during development could have important implications for the use of multichannel cochlear implants in young children. In the present study we have used 2-deoxyglucose autoradiography (2-00) to examine the topographic representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus (IC) of neonatally deafened kittens following periods of chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation.
-
ItemControl strategies for neurons modelled by self-exciting point processes [Abstract]( 1995)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemA clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant users( 1995)Objective: The aim was to measure the rate of vocabulary acquisition for cochlear implant users and compare the pre- and postoperative rates with published data for other groups with normal or impaired hearing. The hypothesis was that the postoperative rate would be greater than the preoperative rate. Design: The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) was administered to 32 children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant. Age at implantation ranged from 2 y r 6 mo to 20 yr and implant use ranged from 6 mo to 7 yr 8 mo. Results: The group mean postoperative performance at various postoperative intervals was significantly higher than mean preoperative performance. Single-subject data indicated statistically significant gains over time on this test for 13 of the subjects. The mean postoperative rate of vocabulary acquisition of 1.06 times the rate for normally hearing children was significantly greater than the mean preoperative rate of 0.43. Conclusions: These rates of improvement were in accord with previous reports on smaller numbers of implant users, but could not be attributed unambiguously to use of the implant because no control group was used for this clinical work. Variables such as age at implantation, duration of profound deafness, communication mode, and speech perception skill failed to significantly predict rate of improvement on the PPVT.
-
ItemA clinical report on speech production of cochlear implant users( 1995)Objective: The aim was to assess articulation and speech intelligibility over time in a group of cochlear implant users implanted at 8 yr or over. The hypothesis was that the postoperative speech production performance would be greater than the preoperative performance. Design: A test of intelligibility using sentences and an articulation test measuring non-imitative elicited speech were administered to 11 and 10 subjects, respectively, who were implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant. Nine subjects received both tests. Age at implantation ranged from 8 yr to 20 yr and implant use ranged from 1 yr to 4 yr 5 mo. Results: For both the intelligibility and articulation tests roughly half of the subjects showed significant improvements over time and group mean postoperative performance significantly exceeded preoperative performance. Improvements occurred for front, middle, and back consonants; for stops, fricatives, and glides and for voiceless and voiced consonants. Conclusions: Despite being deprived of acoustic speech information for many childhood years, roughly half of the patients assessed showed significant gains in speech intelligibility and articulation postimplantation. The lack of a control group of non-implanted patients means that we cannot separate out the influence of the implant on speech production from other influences such as training and tactile-kinaesthetic feedback.
-
ItemContinuing improvements in speech processing for adult cochlear implant patients( 1995)The Cochlear 22-channel cochlear implant has employed a succession of improved speech-processing strategies since its first use in an adult patient in Melbourne in 1982. 1 The first patients received the F0F2 coding strategy developed by the University of Melbourne, in the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP). The F0F2 coding scheme presented the implant user with three acoustic features of speech. These were 1) the amplitude of the waveform, presented as the amount of current charge, 2) fundamental frequency (F0) or voice pitch, presented as rate of biphasic pulsatile stimulation, and 3) the spectral range of the second formant frequency (F2), which was represented by varying the site of stimulation along the electrode array.
-
ItemIssues in the development of multichannel tactile devices for hearing-impaired children and adults( 1995)Levitt, Pickett and Houde (1980), in their landmark monograph, noted that the history of tactile aid development has been characterized by periodic bursts of enthusiasm and research, often culminating in identification of new avenues to be explored for improving tactile perception of speech. While several research groups have maintained long-term interest in tactile research (Boothroyd, 1985; Oller, Payne, & Gavin, 1980; Saunders, 1985), there was a marked increase in reports of new multichannel tactile devices during the 1980s (reviewed in McGarr, 1989). This upsurge may have been spurred in part by the rapid increase world-wide in the number of hearing-impaired children and adults using cochlear implants as everyday communication devices, and the perceived need for a non-surgical approach to assisting hearing-impaired children. Despite this increase in tactile research, no tactile device has yet achieved widespread commercial use by the hearing-impaired community. It is, therefore, of interest to question why cochlear implants have been more widely accepted than tactile devices.
-
ItemCochlear implants in children( 1995)Cochlear implants are devices that are used to artificially excite hearing nerves with patterns of stimulation that convey speech information and environmental sounds when a person's inner ear has been destroyed by disease or not developed at birth. In this situation they cannot benefit from the amplification of sound with a hearing aid.
-
ItemAcute effects of high-rate stimulation on auditory nerve function in guinea pigs( 1995)Cochlear implants have been shown to successfully provide profoundly deaf patients with auditory cues for speech discrimination. Furthermore, a number of safety studies using the Melbourne/Cochlear electrode array indicated that chronic electrical stimulation using charge-balanced biphasic current pulses and stimulus rates between 100 and 500 pulses per second (pps) do not result in additional spiral ganglion loss or general cochlear pathology.1-3 However, safe maximum levels for stimulus parameters (stimulus rate, charge per phase, charge density) have not yet been adequately defined.
-
ItemPrecurved electrode array and insertion tool( 1995)Future improvements in the performance of patients using cochlear implants largely depend on improving the electrode array design. In particular, it is necessary to produce an array that would lie in the desired portion of the scala tympani while minimizing insertion trauma to the cochlea.
-
ItemCochlear implants: future research directions( 1995)The future of cochlear implants for profoundly deaf people now seems assured, and further research should improve its benefits. The present benefits of cochlear implants have now been clearly demonstrated. The results have shown that many postlingually deaf adults get significant open-set speech recognition using electrical stimulation alone, and that profoundly deaf children with a cochlear implant get better speech perception than similar children who use hearing aids or tactile vocoders.