Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 132
-
ItemA multiple-channel cochlear implant: an evaluation using open-set CID sentences( 1981)A multiple-channel cochlear implant and speech processor have been used in two postlingually deaf adult patients with a total hearing loss, to enable them to perceive varying degrees of running speech. The results have been confirmed with open-set CID everyday sentence tests. Using the implant alone, the patients obtained 8% and 14% scores with pre-recorded material, and 34% and 36% scores for "live" presentations. This was equivalent to the perception of 35% of connected discourse. When the implant was used in conjunction with lipreading, improvements of 188% and 386% were obtained over lipreading alone, and the scores were 68% and 98% which were equivalent to the perception of 60% and 95% of connected discourse.
-
ItemSpeech processor design for a multiple-channel cochlear implant( 1980)This paper outlines the strategy adopted for a laboratory-based speech processor used to provide speech information to patients with a multiple-channel cochlear implant It also presents the results of vowel and consonant recognition studies and speech test using open sets of words and sentences.
-
ItemThe surgery for multiple-electrode cochlear implantations(Cambridge University Press, 1979)The multiple-electrode hearing prosthesis designed in the Departments of Otolaryngology and Electrical Engineering (UMDOLEE) at the University of Melbourne (Clark et al., 1977) has been miniaturized with hybrid circuitry so that, if design changes are necessary as a result of initial patient testing, they can be made at minimal cost. This results, however, in increased package dimensions which makes its placement and the design of the surgery more critical. This problem is increased by the fact that we have considered it important to be able to remove the package and replace it with another without disturbing the implanted electrode array, should the first receiver-stimulator fail or an improved design become available. This has meant the design of a special connector (Patrick, 1977; Clark et al., 1978) which adds to the dimensions of the implanted unit. In addition the placement of the coils for transmitting power and information has to be considered. Not only is it desirable to site the coils at a convenient location behind the ear to facilitate the placement and wearing of the external transmitter, but there should also be no relative movement between the coils and the electronic package. These design considerations have led to the sitting of the coils on top of the hermetically-sealed box, and further increased the height of the package. The dimensions of the package shown in Fig. 1 are length 42 mm, width 32 mm, height of connector 8.5 mm, height of receiver-stimulato unit 13 mm. The surgical considerations discussed are the result of a number of temporal bone and cadaver dissections, and the surgical implantation at The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital of the UMDOLEE unit in a specially-selected patient.
-
ItemA cochlear implant round window electrode array(Cambridge University Press, 1979)One important aspect of cochlear implantation is the placement of a multiple-electrode array close to residual auditory nerve fibres so that discrete groups of fibres can be stimulated electrically according to the place basis of frequency coding. Furthermore, in patients who are postlingually deaf these electrodes should lie in relation to the nerve fibres which are responsible for transmitting the frequencies which are important in speech comprehension, viz. 300-3,000 Hz. The method of electrode insertion should also ensure that there is no significant damage to auditory nerve fibres.
-
ItemA multiple-electrode cochlear implant( 1978)Interest in artificially stimulating the auditory nerve electrically for sensori-neural deafness was first sparked off by Volta in the 18th century. Count Volta, who was the first to develop the electric battery, connected up a number of his batteries to two metal rods which he inserted into his ears. Having placed the rods in his ears he pressed the switch and received "une secousse dans la tete" and perceived a noise like "the boiling of thick soup".
-
ItemDesign criteria of a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesis( 1978)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemHearing restoration with the multichannel auditory brainstem implant( 1997)Restoration of useful hearing is now possible in patients with bilateral acoustic neuromas by direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus. Our first experience with the Multichannel Auditory Brainstem Implant is reported. A forty four year old female with bilateral acoustic neuromas and a strong family history of Neurofibromatosis Type II presented with profound bilateral hearing impairment. Translabyrinthine removal of the right tumour was performed with placement of the Nucleus eight electrode Auditory Brainstem Implant. Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response monitoring successfully confirmed placement over the cochlear nucleus. Postoperatively, auditory responses were obtained on stimulation of all electrodes with minimal non-auditory sensations. The patient now receives useful auditory sensations using the "SPEAK" speech processing strategy. Auditory brainstem Implantation should be considered for patients with Neurofibromatosis Type II in whom hearing preservation tumour removal is not possible.
-
ItemDelayed neurotrophin treatment supports auditory neuron survival in deaf guinea pigs [Abstract]( nd)The cochlear implant provides auditory cues to patients with a severe profound hearing loss by direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. As such, the total number and integrity of the surviving auditory neuron population may govern the benefits that patients can derive from the implants. Therefore, the rescue of auditory neurons from degeneration following the loss of hair cells is of great therapeutic significance. Neurotrophic factors are known to be important for the development and maintenance of the auditory system I, and have also been rep6rted to act as survival factors for auditory neurons in animal models of deafness. However, while studies have demonstrated that the application of neurotrophins into the inner ear shortly following deafening can prevent auditory neuron degeneration2,3, much less is known about the survival effects of delayed neurotrophin treatment, which is a clinically more realistic model. This study therefore examined the effects of delayed neurotrophin treatment on auditory neuron survival following deafening. Specifically, we aimed to determine if any or all of the neurotrophins -BDNF, NT -3, NT-4/5 and NGF -could rescue neurons from degeneration after a period of two weeks of deafuess. Normal hearing guinea pigs were bilaterally deafened J using a combination of the aminoglycoside kanamycin and the loop diuretic frusemide. Two weeks later the left cochleae were implanted with a cannula attached to a mini-osmotic pump, which delivered 10Ilg of neurotrophin over a period of 28 days. The right cochleae acted as deafened and untreated controls. Despite the delayed treatments, each of the four neurotrophins prevented the degeneration of auditory neurons that is normally seen following loss of hair cells. When compared to normal hearing animals, the neuronal survival rates of deafened, neurotrophin-treated animals ranged between 79 87%; in contrast, deafened, untreated controls displayed only 52% neuronal survival. Current work is also investigating the expression patterns of the neurotrophin Trk receptors in relation to these findings, and these results will also be discussed. The results of this study provide further support to the theory that neurotrophic factors may be able to be used as therapeutic agents for the benefit of the hearing impaired community.
-
ItemCochlear implants: a personal scientific journey [Abstract]( 2002)Electrical stimulation of the auditory system to reproduce hearing commenced through academic curiosity, and the hope of helping deaf people. It received direction from neurophysiology, and later psychophysics and speech science. In the 1960s and 1970s there were many questions requiring answers before cochlear implants could become a practical reality. Key concerns were: (1) the cochlea was too complex for electrical stimulation to reproduce the coding of sound; (2) multiple electrodes inserted into the cochlea for the place coding of frequency could damage the auditory nerves to be stimulated; (3) speech was too complex to be reproduced by electrical stimulation; and (4) children born deaf would not develop the appropriate neural connectivity for speech understanding. The first questions were addressed on the experimental animal. Speech research on patients was only possible with the advent of silicon chip technology allowing the development of an implantable receiver-stimulator package. Initial research established proof of principle that connected discourse was possible with multiple electrode stimulation of the auditory nerve in severely and profoundly deaf people. The research has been developed industrially for the benefits to be provided on a widespread basis through clinics worldwide. Further research has resulted in continuing improvements so that the average profoundly deaf person can hear as well as someone with severe hearing loss using a hearing aid. There is still much research required to achieve high fidelity sound, hearing in noise, and totally implantable devices.
-
ItemCochlear implants for adults and children(Martin Dunitz, 2002)Cochlear implants which use multiple-electrode speech-processing strategies are now established clinical entity for children and adults, as a result, preoperative selection and (re)habilitation are key issues. It is hard to realize that it was only in the 1960s and 1970s when many scientists and clinicians said that successful cochlear implants were not possible in the foreseeable future. The questions that had to be addressed by a multi disciplinary research effort are discussed, and the solutions achieved from the University of Melbourne's perspective are presented. However, the main aim of this chapter is to focus on preoperative selection, and (re)habilitation, including the results obtained. These issues are discussed primarily with reference to data from the University of Melbourne's Cochlear Implant Clinic at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital. As this is a book on audiological medicine only, an overview of surgical principles is presented. The surgical management of the patient is, of course, very important, so for more details the reader is referred elsewhere. Cochlear implantation has also been the subject of quite intense ethical debate, particularly over its use for children. For this reason, a discussion of ethical issues is included. Finally, the chapter concludes with a vision of research in the next Millennium.