Graeme Clark Collection

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Contributing factors to improved speech perception in children using the nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis
    Cowan, Robert S. C. ; Galvin, Karyn L. ; KLIEVE, SHARON ; Barker, Elizabeth J. ; Sarant, Julia Z. ; DETTMAN, SHANI ; Hollow, Rod ; RANCE, GARY ; Dowell, Richard C. ; PYMAN, BRIAN ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1997)
    It has been established that use of multiple-channel intracochlear implants can significantly improve speech perception for postlinguistically deafened adults. In the development of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant, there have been significant developments in speech processing strategies, providing additional benefits to speech perception for users. This has recently culminated in the release of the Speak speech processing strategy, developed from research at the University of Melbourne. The Speak strategy employs 20 programmable bandpass filters which are scanned at an adaptive rate, with the largest outputs of these filters presented to up to ten stimulation channels along the electrode array. Comparative studies of the Speak processing strategy (in the Nucleus Spectra-22 speech processor), with the previously-used Multipeak (Multipeak) speech processing strategy (in the Minisystem-22 speech processor), with profoundly deaf adult cochlear implant users have shown that the Speak processing strategy provides a significant benefit to adult users both in quiet situations and particularly in the presence of background noise. Since the first implantation of the Nucleus device in a profoundly hearing-impaired child in Melbourne in 1985, there has been a rapid growth in the number of children using this device. Studies of cochlear implant benefits for children using the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant have also shown that children can obtain significant benefits to speech perception, speech production and language, including open-set understanding of words and sentences using the cochlear implant alone. In evaluating contributing factors to speech perception benefits available for children, four specific factors are important to investigate: (1) earlier implantation -resulting from earlier detection of deafness; (2) improved hardware and surgical techniques -allowing implantation in infants; (3) improved speech processing, and (4) improved habilitation techniques. Results reported previously have been recorded primarily for children using the Multipeak strategy implemented in the MSP speech processor. While it is important to evaluate the factors which might contribute to improvements in speech perception benefits, an important question is the effect of improved speech processing strategy, since this will determine what is perceived through the device. Given that adult patients changing to the Spectra speech processor had also shown improved perception in noisy situations, and the fact that children are in general in noisy environments in the classroom setting for a large proportion of their day, it was of obvious interest to evaluate the potential for benefit in poor signal-to-noise ratios from use of the Speak processing strategy and from specific training in the ability to perceive in background noise. The study was aimed at evaluating whether children who were experienced in use of the Multipeak speech processing strategy would be able to changeover to the new Speak processing strategy, which provides a subjectively different output. Secondly, the study aimed to evaluate the benefits which might accrue to children from use of controlled habilitation in background noise.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing
    Cowan, Robert S. C. ; DelDot, J. ; Barker, J. Z. ; Barker, Elizabeth J. ; Sarant, Julia Z. ; Pegg, P. ; Dettman, S. ; Galvin, K. L. ; Rance, G. ; Hollow, R. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Pyman, B. ; Gibson, W. P. R. ; Clark, Graeme, M. ( 1997)
    Objective: Many reports have established that hearing-impaired children using the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant may show both significant benefits to lipreading and significant scores on open-set words and sentences using electrical stimulation only. These findings have raised questions about whether severely or severely-to-profoundly deaf children should be candidates for cochlear implants. To study this question, postoperative results for implanted children with different levels of preoperative residual hearing were evaluated in terms of speech perception benefits. Study Design/Setting: A retrospective study of the first 117 children, sequentially, to undergo implantation in the Melbourne and Sydney Cochlear Implant Clinics was undertaken. All children had been assessed by and received their implants in a tertiary referral centre. Main Outcome Measures: To assess aided residual hearing, the children were grouped into four categories of hearing on the basis of their aided residual hearing thresholds measured preoperatively. To assess benefits, the scores of children on standard speech perception tests were reviewed. As different tests were used for children with different ages and language skills, children were grouped into categories according to the level of postoperative speech perception benefit. Results: The results showed that children in the higher categories of aided preoperative residual hearing showed significant scores on open-set word and sentence perception tests using the implant alone. For children in lower categories of aided residual hearing, results were variable within the groups. More than 90% of children with implants with aided residual hearing thresholds in the speech range above I kHz achieved open-set understanding of words and sentences. Conclusion: While the results of this preliminary study confirm previous findings of differential outcomes for children with different levels of preoperative residual hearing, they suggest that children with severe to profound hearing impairments should be considered for cochlear implantation.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Introduction
    Clark, Graeme M. ; Cowan, Robert S. C. ; Dowell, Richard C. (Singular Publishing, 1997)
    From the time single-channel cochlear implants were first implanted in children in the early 1980s in Los Angeles (Laxford et al 1987) closely followed in 1985 by the multiple-channel cochlear implant in Melbourne (Clark et al 1987a, 1987b) there has been a considerable expansion in the work to apply the multiple-channel cochlear implant to infants and young children.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A training program for use with multichannel speech perception/production tactile devices [Abstract]
    GALVIN, KARYN ; COWAN, ROBERT ; Mavrias, Gina ; Moore, Alessandra ; SARANT, JULIA ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1996)
    Over the past ten years, there have been remarkable improvements in both conventional hearing aid technology and in the use of multichannel cochlear prostheses. These developments have resulted in improved speech perception for severely and profoundly hearing impaired adults and children. However, a small number of adults and children remain unable to benefit from either of these prosthetic approaches. This may occur as a result of medical/surgical issues, which render implantation unfeasible, or from a decision by the patient or parents that the device is inappropriate for the individual person. In these cases, use of a supplemental speech perception device employing the intact tactile modality has been advocated. A number of single and multichannel devices have been developed, both commercially and in the laboratory. One of these, the Tickle Talker, a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, has been developed and thoroughly evaluated with both adults and children at the University of Melbourne. Benefits to speech perception have been noted on both closed-set phonemic discrimination tests, and on open-set word and sentence scores, where the device was used to supplement lipreading and/or aided residual hearing. Benefits to articulation have also been noted. Recently, improved speech processing and the design of a new electrode handset have been implemented. While these factors are important to device acceptance, the critical factor in improving speech perception and production appears to be the training program which is employed with the device. The program must be based on the information available through the device, but organised to emphasize the integration of tactually-encoded speech information into open-set understanding of words and sentences if communication is to be improved. The important elements of the program will be discussed. At present, no tactile device is able to provide sufficient information for open-set speech understanding using only the tactile input. While this may be an ultimate goal, significant periods of training may be required to achieve this outcome.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Components of a rehabilitation programme for young children using the multichannel cochlear implant
    DETTMAN, SHANI ; Barker, Elizabeth ; RANCE, GARY ; DOWELL, RICHARD ; GALVIN, KARYN ; SARANT, JULIA ; COWAN, ROBERT ; Skok, Marisa ; Hollow, Rod ; Larratt, Merran ; Clark, Graeme M. (Whurr, 1996)
    Rehabilitation with young hearing-impaired children may be defined as a teaching; learning process where the role of the clinician is to facilitate acquisition of listening, speech and language in a normal developmental order. This is often referred to as habilitation. It differs from rehabilitation for adults, which is the process by which lost communication skills are reacquired. It is worth discussing the role of the cochlear implant as a tool in this process. For the adult with acquired hearing loss, the cochlear implant might be expected, in part, to facilitate rehabilitation by restoring the auditory sense. The aim is to facilitate speech reception and provide the adult with a speech feedback loop. For a child receiving the cochlear implant, the aims are more complex. The device needs to provide speech perception abilities to facilitate the development of the entire linguistic system, to develop a range of speech sounds, to enable speech monitoring via auditory feedback and to access shared knowledge of the world. (From Introduction)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception results for implanted children with different levels of preoperative residual hearing [Abstract]
    Galvin, K.L. ; Rance, G. ; Larratt, M. ; Hollow, R. ; Herridge, S. ; Skok, M. ; Dowell, R.C. ; Pyman, B. ; Gibson, W.P.R. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Cowan, R. S. C. ; DelDot, J. ; Barker, E. J. ; Sarant, J. Z. ; Dettman, S. ; Pegg, P. ( 1996)
    Many reports have established that hearing-impaired children using the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant may show both significant benefits to lipreading, and significant scores on open-set words and sentences using electrical stimulation only. These findings have raised suggestions that severely or severely-to-profoundly deaf children might benefit more from a cochlear implant than conventional amplification.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception results for the nucleus multiple channel cochlear implant in children and adults with residual hearing [Abstract]
    Brimacombe, J.A. ; Arndt, P.L. ; Menapace, C.M. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Cowan, R. S. C. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Shaw, S. ; Gibson, W. P. R. ; Staller, S. ( 1996)
    Speech perception results for profoundly deaf children and adults using advanced speech processing strategies for the Nucleus multiple-channel cochlear implant have continued to improve, and are now better than those reported in research with severely-to-profoundly hearing-impaired people using aided residual hearing.