Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10
-
ItemInsertion study using new peri-modiolar electrode array designs [Abstract]( 1999)Intracochlear multi-channel cochlear implants have been shown to successfully provide auditory information for profoundly deaf patients by electrically stimulating discrete populations of auditory nerve fibers via a scala tympani (ST) electrode array. Histological and radiological examination of implanted human temporal bones showed that the current straight Nucleus® array is usually positioned against the outer wall of the ST. An electrode array close to the modiolus could be expected to reduce stimulation thresholds and result in a more localized neural excitation pattern.
-
ItemBenefits of pre-curved electrode arrays for the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant [Abstract]( 1998)The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether placement of an electrode closer to the modiolus would provide a more efficient interface with the auditory nerve. A pre-curved, banded 22-electrode array has been developed. Following comprehensive safety studies, the array was inserted in three adult patients. Detailed x-ray analyses have been conducted to specify the positions of the electrode bands. Psychophysical studies have been conducted, within each subject, using electrodes which lie at differing distances from the modiolus. These studies have shown that as the distance from the modiolus decreased, electrode threshold currents decreased and dynamic ranges increased. Thresholds were lower than in a comparison group of standard array users. Forward masking studies showed current spread to be more focused at the electrodes lying closer to the modiolus. Electrode discrimination was also better at electrodes closer to the modiolus. JND for loudness, expressed as a function of dynamic range also decreased in this condition. Thus, a preliminary profile of the parameters of interest, for an improved implant design, suggest that an array which lies closer to the modiolus can result in lower current requirements and a more localised pattern of neural excitation.
-
ItemSpeech perception & indirect benefits for severely hearing impaired children using cochlear implants [Abstract]( 1998)The benefits to speech perception, speech production, communication, and quality of life were investigated for severely hearing impaired children using cochlear implants and hearing aids. For the youngest children, assessments of psychological status, and use of a battery of cognitive and language tests were important factors in determining performance benefits prior to the child developing speech. For older children, the effects of increased one-to-one oral habilitation, and systematic encouragement of parental involvement were also investigated. Results suggested that parental support for consistent device use was an important factor in producing outcomes. Children with residual hearing were more likely to achieve open-set perception. Each child was also assessed for changes in quality of life, through use of a standardized health utility instrument. Results from the group were collated, and teamed with a costing assessment for the procedure, which allowed a complete cost-utility analysis to be completed. Results suggested that indirect benefits, such as the effects on speech production, usual activities, lower concentration, and less distress were ranked as more important than changes to hearing in a number of the children. Costs per QALY were consistent with those reported in the literature, and suggested that the cochlear implant is highly cost-effective as a medical technology.
-
ItemPerformance benefits and costs for children using cochlear implants and hearing aids [Abstract]( 1998)The value of cochlear implants as an established clinical option for profoundly hearing impaired adults and children has been supported by significant research results over a number of years which has clearly established the benefits available (U.S. National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement 1995). Benefit has traditionally been considered as the direct impact of the cochlear implant procedure on speech perception, or in the case of children, on the use of that auditory information to develop understandable speech and to acquire a knowledge of language. As a consequence of continuing research to improve hardware and speech processing strategies, mean scores on open-set tests of monosyllables or sentence materials for implanted adults using the cochlear implant alone without lipreading have continued to show an upwards trend. In response to the increased mean scores in quiet, perception tests in background noise are now being used as a more accurate direct measure of the potential benefits of cochlear implants to severely-to-profoundly hearing-impaired candidates. Consideration should also be given to indirect benefits, such as reduction in the stress of listening and lipreading, improved performance at work, enhanced opportunity to maintain speech, or in children to develop speech which is understandable to the general community, and the social effects of reducing the isolating effects of profound deafness. Measurement of indirect benefit can be combined with an analysis of the costs of the procedure, enabling evaluation of the implant procedure from a cost-utility standpoint, and a comparison of outcomes using other technologies such as hearing aids. This study will present data on direct and indirect benefits for hearing-impaired children using Nucleus cochlear implant systems, and compare this data with benefits shown for similarly hearing impaired children using hearing aids. The significance of these results to cost-effective delivery of services will be discussed.
-
ItemEvaluation of direct and indirect benefits in the selection of cochlear implant candidates [Abstract]( 1998)The value of cochlear implants as an established clinical option for profoundly hearing-impaired adults and children has been supported by significant research results over a number of years which clearly established the benefits available (U.S. National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement 1995). Benefit has traditionally been considered as the impact of the cochlear implant procedure on hearing, and in the case of children, on the use of that hearing to develop speech and language. However, as a result of continuing research, improvements have been realised both in hardware and speech processing. As a direct consequence of these improvements, the mean open-set implant-alone speech perception scores for implanted adults have continued to increase. In response to the increased mean scores shown by adult cochlear implant users in quiet, perception tests in background noise are now being used as a direct measure of the potential benefits of cochlear implants available to severely-to-profoundly hearing-impaired candidates. In addition, consideration in candidature should also be given to indirect benefits, such as reduction in the stress. of listening and lipreading, improved performance at work, enhanced opportunity to maintain or in children to develop speech which is understandable to the general community, and the social effects of reducing the isolating effects of profound deafness. Measurement of indirect benefit can be combined with a costing study, enabling evaluation of the implant procedure from a cost-utility standpoint, and comparison of outcomes using other technologies such as hearing aids. The use of new approaches to candidature, including new measures of direct and indirect benefit is reported using data from the Melbourne cochlear implant program.
-
ItemResults of multichannel cochlear implantation in very young children [Abstract]( 1995)Most researchers and clinicians working in the cochlear implant field have assumed that profoundly deaf children will have a better prognosis in terms of speech perception, speech production and language development, implanted at as young an age as possible. However, it has been difficult to gather direct evidence for this hypothesis due to the problems in assessing children under the age of five years with formal tests.
-
ItemSpeech perception results for implanted children with different levels of preoperative residual hearing [Abstract]( 1996)Many reports have established that hearing-impaired children using the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant may show both significant benefits to lipreading, and significant scores on open-set words and sentences using electrical stimulation only. These findings have raised suggestions that severely or severely-to-profoundly deaf children might benefit more from a cochlear implant than conventional amplification.
-
ItemSpeech perception results for the nucleus multiple channel cochlear implant in children and adults with residual hearing [Abstract]( 1996)Speech perception results for profoundly deaf children and adults using advanced speech processing strategies for the Nucleus multiple-channel cochlear implant have continued to improve, and are now better than those reported in research with severely-to-profoundly hearing-impaired people using aided residual hearing.
-
ItemSpeech perception benefits for implanted children with preoperative residual hearing [Abstract]( 1995)Since the implantation of the first children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis in Melbourne in 1985, there has been rapid expansion in the number of implanted children world-wide. Improved surgical technique and experience in paediatric assessment and management have contributed to a trend to implant very young children. At the same time there has also been continuing development of improved speech processing strategies resulting in greater speech perception benefits.
-
ItemComparative performance of children using the cochlear 22-channel implant and 8-channel 'Tickle Talker'( 1992)Direct comparison of "Tickle Talker" and Cochlear Implant users is problematic, due to difficulties in matching groups of children for hearing loss, age, duration of deafness, speech perception and language skills, and educational placement. However, two studies were undertaken to compare and contrast potential benefits available from these two devices. In the first study, a number of children from one educational setting were evaluated over a six month period. Half of the children used the multiple channel cochlear implant, while the other half used the multiple channel "Tickle Talker". The number of training sessions, clinicians involved, type of training provided, and overall management philosophy were identical for both devices. Comparison of progress of these two groups of children demonstrates that both devices are effective in improving' communication. However, differences were found with the tactile device being more limited in information provided and speech perception benefits. In the second study, two children who have used both devices were evaluated. These two children initially used the ''Tickle Talker" for periods up to two years, and subsequently had a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Similar habilitation was provided to these children with both devices, and measures of speech perception were taken at similar time periods. Results for one of the children, a prelinguistically deafened adolescent, already show similar benefits in terms of supplementation of lipreading for both devices. However, this patient has also shown some open-set word and sentence perception using the implant-alone. To date, this level of performance has not been achieved with the ''Tickle Talker". The results of these studies suggest a role for a multiple channel tactile device in a cochlear implant clinic as a training device for evaluating the ability of adults or children to integrate speech information presented through different sensory modalities. This could facilitate pre-implant evaluation of the potential for children to benefit from added speech information, which is often difficult to evaluate in congenitally deaf children.