Graeme Clark Collection

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Multichannel cochlear implantation in children: a summary of current work at The University of Melbourne
    Dowell, Richard C. ; Dawson, Pam W. ; Dettman, Shani J. ; Shepherd, Robert K. ; Whitford, Lesley A. ; Seligman, Peter M. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1991)
    This paper summarizes research work relating to multichannel cochlear implantation in children at the University of Melbourne. Ongoing safety studies relating to the implantation of young children are discussed. Results of these studies suggest that special design considerations are necessary for a prosthesis to be implanted in children under the age of 2 years. Results of clinical assessment of implanted children and adolescents are also discussed in terms of speech perception, speech production, and language development, and some possible predictive factors are suggested. Preliminary data suggests that a high proportion of young children can achieve open-set speech perception with the cochlear implant given appropriate training and support. Initial results with adults using new speech processing hardware and a new coding scheme are also presented. These suggest that improved speech perception in quiet and competing noise is possible with the new system.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The University of Melbourne/Nucleus cochlear prosthesis
    Clark, Graeme M. ; Blamey, P. J. ; Brown, A. M. ; Busby, P. A. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Franz, B. K-H. ; Millar, J. B. ; Pyman, B. C. ; Shepherd, R. K. ; Tong, Y. C. ; Webb, R. L. ; Brimacombe, J. A. ; Hirshorn, M. S. ; Kuzma, J. ; Mecklenburg, D. J. ; Money, D. K. ; Patrick, J. F. ; Seligman, P. M. ( 1988)
    This is a review of research to develop the University of Melbourne/Nucleus cochlear prosthesis for patients with a profound-total hearing loss. A more complete review can be obtained in Clark et al. A prototype receiver-stimulator and multiple-electrode array developed at the University of Melbourne was first implanted in a postlingually deaf adult patient with a profound-total hearing loss on 1 August 1978. A speech processing strategy which could help this patient understand running speech, especially when combined with lipreading was developed in 1978 following initial psychophysical studies. A prototype wearable speech processor was fabricated in 1979, that could provide significant help for the first two patients in understanding running speech when used in combination with lipreading compared with lipreading alone, and it also enabled them to understand some running speech when using electrical stimulation alone. An implantable receiver-stimulator and wearable speech processor embodying the principles of the prototype devices were then produced for clinical trial by the Australian biomedical firm, Nucleus Ltd, and its subsidiaries, Cochlear Pty Ltd and Cochlear Corporation. This cochlear implant was initially clinically trialled on six patients at The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital in 1982, and shown to give similar results to those obtained with the prototype device. In view of these findings a clinical trial was carried out for a Premarket Approval Application to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and extended to a number of centres in the US, Canada, and West Germany. This clinical trial confirmed that patients could understand running speech when electrical stimulation was combined with lipreading, and that some patients could also understand running speech when using electrical stimulation alone. Today, more than 600 patients world-wide are using cochlear implants developed from the research described in this paper.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The auditory cortex and auditory deprivation: experience with cochlear implants in the congenitally deaf [Abstract]
    Shepherd, R. K. ; Hartmann, R. ; Heid, S. ; Klinke, R. ; Blamey, P. J. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Clarke, Graeme M. ( 1995)
    The primary auditory cortex (AI) exhibits a topographic representation of the organ of Corti in normal hearing animals. Plasticity studies have shown that this orderly representation of frequency can be modified following a restricted hearing loss or by behavioural trainingl,2. Little is known, however, of the effects of a profound hearing loss on AI, although a number of early studies have suggested an enhancement of activity from other modalities3. Knowledge of the functional status of the central auditory pathway in the profoundly deaf, and the ability of these structures to undergo reorganization particularly following long periods of auditory deprivation - are important issues for the clinical management of cochlear implant patients. In this paper we review our recent clinical and experimental experience with cochlear implants in the congenitally deaf.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Multichannel cochlear implants in children: an overview of experimental and clinical results [Abstract]
    Shepherd, Robert K. ; Dowell, Richard C. ; Xu, Shi-Ang ; Clark, Graeme M. ; McDermott, Hugh J. ; McKay, Colette M. ( 1991)
    During the last decade there has been great progress in the clinical management of profound, postlinguistically deafened adults through the use of multichannel cochlear implants. The device developed by Cochlear Pty. Ltd. in association with the University of Melbourne, electrically stimulates selective regions of the residual auditory nerve using an array of 22 Pt electrodes located within the scala tympani. A speech processing strategy has been developed to provide patients with both voice pitch, and first and second formant information. Following experimental safety studies and successful clinical trials, this device was approved for use in adults by the United States FDA in 1985. In 1990, following further miniaturization of the implant, the FDA approved the device for use in profoundly deafened children above the age of two years. The present paper presents an overview of our recent biological safety studies and clinical experience with cochlear implants in children, and discusses the likely future development of these devices. Our biological safety studies were designed to evaluate the safety and design requirements of cochlear implantation in children, and more recently has focussed on issues for implantation in very young children (< 2 years old). These studies included the measurement of growth in the human temporal bone and the development of lead wires that can accommodate such growth, the development of an electrode fixation technique close to the cochlea, the effect of cochlear implantation on skull growth, the effect of long-term electrical stimulation on the maturing auditory system and the stimulating electrodes, and the effect of middle ear infection on cochlear implantation. Our clinical experience is based on twenty-five children that have now been implanted in our clinic. They include (i) postlinguistically deafened children; (ii) congenitally or early-deafened young children; and (iii) congenitally or early deafened adolescents. Clinical testing has shown improvements in speech perception, speech production and language in all three groups. Postlinguistically deafened children show similar speech perception results to postlinguistically deafened adults. For the congenitally deaf, younger children tend to show better results than the adolescents. Significantly, these clinical results are consistent with results from 142 children obtained from clinics throughout the world. These experimental and clinical results support the use of cochlear implants in young children. Further clinical improvements can be expected in the future with advances in both hardware and speech processing strategies.