Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 54
-
ItemMultichannel auditory brainstem implants: an Australian case study [Abstract]( 1996)The multichannel Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) is an implantable device designed to restore a level of auditory perception in patients with bilateral acoustic neuromas, where the removal of the tumours is expected to result in a total loss of hearing. As with the cochlear implant, the ABI utilises an externally worn speech processor and headset, together with a surgically-placed receiver-stimulator and electrode array. The electrode array, developed through the collaboration of the House Ear Institute in the United States and Cochlear Corporation, consists of eight electrodes on a carrier, which is placed on the surface of the brainstem in the area of the cochlear nucleus.
-
ItemCurrent trends in speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant patients [Abstract]( 1996)In 1994, Cochlear Pty. Ltd. (Now Cochlear Limited) released a new speech processor, the Spectra 22, for use with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. The Spectra 22 speech processor incorporates a new speech processing strategy called SPEAK, which is based upon research conducted by the University of Melbourne. This paper reports post-operative scores on open-set word and sentence materials for adult patients in the Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic who have been started up with the Spectra 22 speech processor.
-
ItemSpeech perception in people with a severe hearing loss: preliminary results [Abstract]( 1996)Recent improvements in multichannel cochlear implants have led to improved speech perception for people with profound hearing impairments. Given this improvement, it has been suggested that some people with severe hearing impairments would be more successful with a cochlear implant than a hearing aid. Unfortunately little research exists to support the suitability of cochlear implants for these individuals. In order to determine this, a detailed investigation of the aided performance of people with severe hearing losses is being conducted at The University of Melbourne (School of Audiology). Severe hearing loss was defined as a pure tone average of greater than 60dBHL, but no worse that 100dBSPL in the better ear. At present, 15 participants have taken part in this study and their results will be discussed. Each participant took part in a standard audiometric assessment which included an audiogram, AB words, tympanometry with acoustic reflexes and an ABR. Each participant’s hearing aids were assessed to make sure that they were optimally aided. Following the hearing aid evaluation the participants took part in a series of traditional speech perception tests which included 24 consonant recognition, 11 vowel recognition, CNC words, CUNY sentences, and the Connected Speech Test (CSTv2). Other tests of speech perception were conducted which looked at the effects of different types of background noise, amounts of reverberation, rates of speech and amount of available context. The aim of this was to better simulate “real-life” listening conditions. Consequently, a range of results for both traditional assessments of speech perception and simulated listening conditions will be presented and compared.
-
ItemSpeech perception for hearing aid users versus cochlear implantees [Abstract]( 1996)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemComponents of a rehabilitation programme for young children using the multichannel cochlear implant(Whurr, 1996)Rehabilitation with young hearing-impaired children may be defined as a teaching; learning process where the role of the clinician is to facilitate acquisition of listening, speech and language in a normal developmental order. This is often referred to as habilitation. It differs from rehabilitation for adults, which is the process by which lost communication skills are reacquired. It is worth discussing the role of the cochlear implant as a tool in this process. For the adult with acquired hearing loss, the cochlear implant might be expected, in part, to facilitate rehabilitation by restoring the auditory sense. The aim is to facilitate speech reception and provide the adult with a speech feedback loop. For a child receiving the cochlear implant, the aims are more complex. The device needs to provide speech perception abilities to facilitate the development of the entire linguistic system, to develop a range of speech sounds, to enable speech monitoring via auditory feedback and to access shared knowledge of the world. (From Introduction)
-
ItemSpeech perception for children with different levels of residual hearing using the cochlear 22-channel cochlear prosthesis [Abstract[( 1996)Over the past 10 years, since the implantation of the first children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis in Melbourne, the number of profoundly deaf children using this implant system has rapidly expanded. Longer-term experience with implanted children has led to improvements in paediatric assessment and management. Speech processing strategies have also been improved, resulting in a series of increases in speech perception benefits. Results of comparative studies of Speak and Multipeak speech processing strategies have shown that open-set word and sentence scores for a group of thirteen children evaluated over a two year period showed an advantage with the Speak speech processing strategy. The increases were noted particularly in speech perception in poor signal-to-noise conditions. Analysis has shown that consonant perception was significantly increased, due to an improved place perception. Given current speech perception scores for implanted children, it has been suggested that severely-to-profoundly deaf children currently using hearing aids could in fact benefit more from a cochlear implant. Preliminary investigation of results for children in the Melbourne and Sydney cochlear implant programs has shown that children with higher levels of preoperative residual hearing as a group do score significantly on open-set word and sentence perception tests using the implant alone. In children with lower levels of residual hearing, results were variable across the group.
-
ItemContinuing improvements in speech processing for adult cochlear implant patients( 1995)The Cochlear 22-channel cochlear implant has employed a succession of improved speech-processing strategies since its first use in an adult patient in Melbourne in 1982. 1 The first patients received the F0F2 coding strategy developed by the University of Melbourne, in the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP). The F0F2 coding scheme presented the implant user with three acoustic features of speech. These were 1) the amplitude of the waveform, presented as the amount of current charge, 2) fundamental frequency (F0) or voice pitch, presented as rate of biphasic pulsatile stimulation, and 3) the spectral range of the second formant frequency (F2), which was represented by varying the site of stimulation along the electrode array.
-
ItemThe progress of children using the multichannel cochlear implant in Melbourne( 1995)Multi-channel cochlear implantation in children began in Australia in 1985 and there are now close to 4000 profoundly deaf children and adolescents using the Australian implant system around the world. The aim of the implant procedure is to provide adequate hearing for speech and language development through auditory input. This contrasts with the situation for adults with acquired deafness where the cochlear implant aims to restore hearing for someone with well-developed auditory processing and language skills. As with adults, results vary over a wide range for children using the Multi-channel implant. Many factors have been suggested that may contribute to differences in speech perception for implanted children. In an attempt to better understand these factors, the speech perception results for children implanted in Melbourne were reviewed and subjected to statistical analysis. This has indicated that the amount of experience with the implant and the length of sensory deprivation are strongly correlated with perceptual results. This means that younger children are likely to perform better with an implant and that a number of years of experience are required for children to reach their full potential. The results have also indicated that educational placement and management play a crucial role in children reaching their potential. Overall, 60% of the children and adolescents in the study have reached a level of open-set speech understanding using the cochlear implant without lipreading.
-
ItemPotential and limitations of cochlear implants in children( 1995)Multiple-channel cochlear implants have been in use with children and adolescents for 8 years. The speech perception, speech production, and language of many of these children has been investigated in some detail.l-4 There have been many predictions about factors that may affect the performance of children with implants. For instance, it has been suggested that children with a congenital loss of hearing would not have the same potential to benefit from a cochlear implant as those with an acquired loss. Similarly, it has been suggested that younger children are likely to gain more benefit from a cochlear implant because of the effect of various critical ages for language learning.5 As more results have become available, it has been our observation that the performance of any particular child with a cochlear implant does not appear to follow well-defined rules, and that generalizations about the potential of certain groups of children are likely to encounter many exceptions. We now have a large quantity of results for children using cochlear implants, and it may be possible to determine some of the factors that have a significant effect on performance. This paper will attempt to identify some of these factors by reviewing speech perception results for 100 children implanted with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis in Australia and speech perception results for adult patients. This analysis will use an "information processing" model of a child using a cochlear implant. That is, we will assume that a child will benefit from a cochlear implant in terms of speech perception, production, and language development, if he or she receives a maximal amount of auditory information from the environment, and is able to process this information successfully. This model divides potential limiting or predictive factors into those that affect the information presented to the auditory system (eg, implant technology, surviving auditory neurons) and those that affect the processing of this information (eg, development of central auditory pathways, amount and consistency of auditory input).
-
ItemVowel imitation task: results over time for 28 cochlear implant children under the age of eight years( 1995)With increasing numbers of implanted children under the age of 4 years, numerous researchers have reminded us of the need for valid, sensitive, and reliable tests of developing speech perception.1,2 In addition to studies of the efficacy of implanted prostheses, there is a need to investigate the many variables that influence children's communicative performance, such as changes in speech-coding strategy, updated speech-processing systems, the effects of various training regimens, and the selection of educational and communication modes.