Graeme Clark Collection

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Contributing factors to improved speech perception in children using the nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis
    Cowan, Robert S. C. ; Galvin, Karyn L. ; KLIEVE, SHARON ; Barker, Elizabeth J. ; Sarant, Julia Z. ; DETTMAN, SHANI ; Hollow, Rod ; RANCE, GARY ; Dowell, Richard C. ; PYMAN, BRIAN ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1997)
    It has been established that use of multiple-channel intracochlear implants can significantly improve speech perception for postlinguistically deafened adults. In the development of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant, there have been significant developments in speech processing strategies, providing additional benefits to speech perception for users. This has recently culminated in the release of the Speak speech processing strategy, developed from research at the University of Melbourne. The Speak strategy employs 20 programmable bandpass filters which are scanned at an adaptive rate, with the largest outputs of these filters presented to up to ten stimulation channels along the electrode array. Comparative studies of the Speak processing strategy (in the Nucleus Spectra-22 speech processor), with the previously-used Multipeak (Multipeak) speech processing strategy (in the Minisystem-22 speech processor), with profoundly deaf adult cochlear implant users have shown that the Speak processing strategy provides a significant benefit to adult users both in quiet situations and particularly in the presence of background noise. Since the first implantation of the Nucleus device in a profoundly hearing-impaired child in Melbourne in 1985, there has been a rapid growth in the number of children using this device. Studies of cochlear implant benefits for children using the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant have also shown that children can obtain significant benefits to speech perception, speech production and language, including open-set understanding of words and sentences using the cochlear implant alone. In evaluating contributing factors to speech perception benefits available for children, four specific factors are important to investigate: (1) earlier implantation -resulting from earlier detection of deafness; (2) improved hardware and surgical techniques -allowing implantation in infants; (3) improved speech processing, and (4) improved habilitation techniques. Results reported previously have been recorded primarily for children using the Multipeak strategy implemented in the MSP speech processor. While it is important to evaluate the factors which might contribute to improvements in speech perception benefits, an important question is the effect of improved speech processing strategy, since this will determine what is perceived through the device. Given that adult patients changing to the Spectra speech processor had also shown improved perception in noisy situations, and the fact that children are in general in noisy environments in the classroom setting for a large proportion of their day, it was of obvious interest to evaluate the potential for benefit in poor signal-to-noise ratios from use of the Speak processing strategy and from specific training in the ability to perceive in background noise. The study was aimed at evaluating whether children who were experienced in use of the Multipeak speech processing strategy would be able to changeover to the new Speak processing strategy, which provides a subjectively different output. Secondly, the study aimed to evaluate the benefits which might accrue to children from use of controlled habilitation in background noise.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing
    Cowan, Robert S. C. ; DelDot, J. ; Barker, J. Z. ; Barker, Elizabeth J. ; Sarant, Julia Z. ; Pegg, P. ; Dettman, S. ; Galvin, K. L. ; Rance, G. ; Hollow, R. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Pyman, B. ; Gibson, W. P. R. ; Clark, Graeme, M. ( 1997)
    Objective: Many reports have established that hearing-impaired children using the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant may show both significant benefits to lipreading and significant scores on open-set words and sentences using electrical stimulation only. These findings have raised questions about whether severely or severely-to-profoundly deaf children should be candidates for cochlear implants. To study this question, postoperative results for implanted children with different levels of preoperative residual hearing were evaluated in terms of speech perception benefits. Study Design/Setting: A retrospective study of the first 117 children, sequentially, to undergo implantation in the Melbourne and Sydney Cochlear Implant Clinics was undertaken. All children had been assessed by and received their implants in a tertiary referral centre. Main Outcome Measures: To assess aided residual hearing, the children were grouped into four categories of hearing on the basis of their aided residual hearing thresholds measured preoperatively. To assess benefits, the scores of children on standard speech perception tests were reviewed. As different tests were used for children with different ages and language skills, children were grouped into categories according to the level of postoperative speech perception benefit. Results: The results showed that children in the higher categories of aided preoperative residual hearing showed significant scores on open-set word and sentence perception tests using the implant alone. For children in lower categories of aided residual hearing, results were variable within the groups. More than 90% of children with implants with aided residual hearing thresholds in the speech range above I kHz achieved open-set understanding of words and sentences. Conclusion: While the results of this preliminary study confirm previous findings of differential outcomes for children with different levels of preoperative residual hearing, they suggest that children with severe to profound hearing impairments should be considered for cochlear implantation.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Surgery
    Clark, Graeme M. ; Pyman, Brian C. ; Webb, Robert L. (Singular Publishing, 1997)
    Cochlear implant surgery should be undertaken only after the cochlear implant team has established that the child is not achieving useful communication with a hearing aid. This can be difficult because of poor language development in deaf children in this age group or because the child is at a preverbal stage and too young for the use of formal assessment tests. The child's unaided and aided thresholds, however, are important for assessment, as are his or her communication skills. These need to be evaluated by an experienced paediatric audiologist.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Preoperative medical evaluation
    Clark, Graeme M. ; Pyman, Brian C. (Singular Publishing, 1997)
    The aim of the medical assessment of infants and children is to determine the cause, severity and duration of any hearing loss as well as the presence of any medical conditions that may influence their management with a cochlear implant. There should also be an initial assessment of the child's communication skills and the parental expectations for his or her education.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Continuing improvements in speech processing for adult cochlear implant patients
    Hollow, R. D. ; Dowell, R. C. ; Cowan, R. S. C. ; Skok, M. C. ; Pyman, B. C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1995)
    The Cochlear 22-channel cochlear implant has employed a succession of improved speech-processing strategies since its first use in an adult patient in Melbourne in 1982. 1 The first patients received the F0F2 coding strategy developed by the University of Melbourne, in the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP). The F0F2 coding scheme presented the implant user with three acoustic features of speech. These were 1) the amplitude of the waveform, presented as the amount of current charge, 2) fundamental frequency (F0) or voice pitch, presented as rate of biphasic pulsatile stimulation, and 3) the spectral range of the second formant frequency (F2), which was represented by varying the site of stimulation along the electrode array.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation: a case study
    Kawano, A. ; Seldon, H. L. ; Pyman, B. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1995)
    It is conceivable that the variations of performance of cochlear implant patients can be related to several factors. Shiroma et al 1 investigated which factors contributed to the speech recognition ability of cochlear implant patients; multiple regression analysis showed that postoperative psychophysical percepts such as threshold level (T level), maximum comfortable loudness level (C level), and dynamic ranges (DR) may play an important role in speech recognition ability. In this paper, we focus on determining which intracochlear factors contribute to these postoperative psychophysical percepts of the 22-channel cochlear implant system. We made a three-dimensional (3-D) computer reconstruction 2 from the temporal bone of a cochlear implant patient and measured the following factors: distance between the electrode ring's center and the Rosenthal's canal center (dis); the cross-sectional areas of loose and dense fibrous tissue (lft, dft), their sum, fibrous tissue (ft), and new bone (nb) as inner ear pathologic changes; and the density of residual spiral ganglion cells (sgc). The interrelationship between the postoperative psychophysical percepts and these factors is analyzed and discussed.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Peri-modiolar electrode arrays: a comparison of electrode position n the human temporal bone
    Shepherd, R. K. ; Treaba, C. G. ; Cohen, L. ; Pyman, B. ; Huigen, J. ; Xu, J. ; Clark, Graeme M. (Monduzzi Editore, 1997)
    This paper describes a radiologic evaluation of three types of peri-modiolar arrays, comparing their trajectory within the scala tympani with a standard Mini-22 electrode. All peri-modiolar arrays were found to lie closer to the modiolus for much of their insertion length compared with the standard array. While one design showed evidence for the potential of increased insertion trauma, two designs produced satisfactory results. Although further electrode development, temporal bone and histopathologic studies arE required, it would appear that the benefits of peri-modiolar electrode arrays will be realised clinically.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Siting the receiver-stimulator of the CI-24M model of the Cochlear Limited multiple-channel cochlear implant and fixation of its electrode array
    PYMAN, BRIAN ; Clark, Graeme M. (Monduzzi Editore, 1997)
    The correct siting of the cochlear implant receiver-stimulator package is important. The package should not obtrude significantly above the surface of bone, and should be so that blows to the head do not in damage to the package, skull or brain. The cochlear implant electrode array must be fixed at a site close to the cochlea, so that the electrode will not slide out, or be subject to differential movement with growth changes. Fixation, with Dacron® mesh, platinum-iridium ties, or clips, has been in the region of the posterior root of the zygoma and the floor of the antrum. Our research studies demonstrate that a specially-designed collar around the array can be placed through the cochleostomy and provide the necessary locking to prevent retraction of the array. It has a ceramic surround to encourage union with neighbouring bone, and stress relief to reduce wire fracture at the point where the array leaves the cochlea.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception results for implanted children with different levels of preoperative residual hearing [Abstract]
    Galvin, K.L. ; Rance, G. ; Larratt, M. ; Hollow, R. ; Herridge, S. ; Skok, M. ; Dowell, R.C. ; Pyman, B. ; Gibson, W.P.R. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Cowan, R. S. C. ; DelDot, J. ; Barker, E. J. ; Sarant, J. Z. ; Dettman, S. ; Pegg, P. ( 1996)
    Many reports have established that hearing-impaired children using the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant may show both significant benefits to lipreading, and significant scores on open-set words and sentences using electrical stimulation only. These findings have raised suggestions that severely or severely-to-profoundly deaf children might benefit more from a cochlear implant than conventional amplification.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Speech perception benefits for implanted children with preoperative residual hearing [Abstract]
    Hollow, R. ; Rance, G. ; Dowell, R.C. ; Pyman, B. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Cowan, R. S. C. ; Galvin, K. L. ; Barker, E. J. ; Sarant, J. Z. ; Dettman, S. ( 1995)
    Since the implantation of the first children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear prosthesis in Melbourne in 1985, there has been rapid expansion in the number of implanted children world-wide. Improved surgical technique and experience in paediatric assessment and management have contributed to a trend to implant very young children. At the same time there has also been continuing development of improved speech processing strategies resulting in greater speech perception benefits.