- Graeme Clark Collection
Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
20 results
Filters
Reset filtersSettings
Statistics
Citations
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 10 of 20
-
ItemA multiple-channel cochlear implant: an evaluation using nonsense syllablesClark, Graeme M. ; Tong, Yit Chow ; Martin, Lois F. ; Busby, Peter A. ; Dowell, Richard C. ; Seligman, Peter M. ; Patrick, James F. ( 1981)A study using nonsense syllables has shown that a multiple-channel cochlear implant with speech processor is effective in providing information about, voicing and manner and to a lesser extent place distinctions. These distinctions supplement lipreading cues. Furthermore, the average percentage improvements in overall identification scores for multiple-channel electrical stimulation and lipreading compared to lipreading alone were 71% for a laboratory-based speech processor and 122 % for a wearable unit.
-
ItemCurrent distribution measurements within the human cochleaBlack, Raymond C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Patrick, James F. ( 1981)The magnitudes of tile currents returned through each ground electrode line of a multiple-electrode cochlear implant array were determined during surgical implantations on two patients. These were often found to be distributed widely to points far from the stimulus electrode site. Further measurements made in in vitro solutions demonstrated that the distributions were due largely to the ground electrode interface impedances being significantly larger than the fluid-path impedances, and demonstrated that distributions could be changed by modification of the ground electrode interface impedances.
-
ItemSpeech processing for a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesisTong, Y. C. ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Seligman, P. M. ; Patrick, J. F. ( 1980)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemA cochlear implant round window electrode arrayClark, Graeme M. ; Patrick, J. F. ; Bailey, Q. (Cambridge University Press, 1979)One important aspect of cochlear implantation is the placement of a multiple-electrode array close to residual auditory nerve fibres so that discrete groups of fibres can be stimulated electrically according to the place basis of frequency coding. Furthermore, in patients who are postlingually deaf these electrodes should lie in relation to the nerve fibres which are responsible for transmitting the frequencies which are important in speech comprehension, viz. 300-3,000 Hz. The method of electrode insertion should also ensure that there is no significant damage to auditory nerve fibres.
-
ItemA multiple-electrode cochlear implantClark, Graeme M. ; Tong, Y. C. ; Bailey, Q. R. ; Black, R. C. ; Martin, L. F. ; Millar, J. B. ; O'Loughlin B. J. ; Patrick, J. F. ; Pyman, B. C. ( 1978)Interest in artificially stimulating the auditory nerve electrically for sensori-neural deafness was first sparked off by Volta in the 18th century. Count Volta, who was the first to develop the electric battery, connected up a number of his batteries to two metal rods which he inserted into his ears. Having placed the rods in his ears he pressed the switch and received "une secousse dans la tete" and perceived a noise like "the boiling of thick soup".
-
ItemDesign criteria of a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesisClark, Graeme M. ; Black, R. C. ; Forster, I. C. ; Patrick, J. F. ; Tong, Y. C. ( 1978)Abstract not available due to copyright.
-
ItemEngineeringPatrick, James F. ; Seligman, Peter M. ; Clark, Graeme M. (Singular Publishing, 1997)The last two decades have seen major advances in cochlear implants for profoundly deaf people. Implants are now used by severely to profoundly deaf adults and children in almost every phase of daily life. They have become an established treatment, and today's expectations for all aspects of the cochlear implant system are much greater than they were for the experimental devices of the early 1980s. Hardware designs have improved to meet clinical and research demands, technological developments have made the devices smaller and more reliable, and speech processing research has yielded a series of improvements in patient benefit.
-
ItemComparison of current speech coding strategiesWhitford, L. A. ; Seligman, P. M. ; Blamey, Peter J. ; McDermott, H. J. ; Patrick, J. F. ( 1993)This paper reports on two studies carried out at the University of Melbourne jointly with Cochlear Pty Ltd. The studies demonstrated substantial speech perception improvements over the current Multipeak strategy in background noise.
-
ItemThe Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant systemPatrick, James F. ; Clark, Graeme M. ( 1991)Cochlear implants have become the treatment of choice for profoundly deaf adults and children who obtain little or no benefit from conventional amplification. Sounds are translated into small electric currents that stimulate the auditory nerves in the cochlea and generate hearing sensations. The Nucleus cochlear implant is the result of more than 20 yr of research and development, first at the University of Melbourne, Australia and later by Cochlear Proprietary Limited (Sydney, Australia) in collaboration with the University of Melbourne. Today, the cochlear Mini-22 implant system is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in adults and children, and has been implanted in more than 3000 patients worldwide. Although this chapter describes the cochlear implant system and clinical issues related to its use in children, much of the material has been derived from experience with adults. Furthermore, the Nucleus system is not static. It is being continually improved both in performance and ease of use. The purpose of this chapter is to describe developments leading up to and including the present Nucleus cochlear implant system. Other chapters in this issue present results and procedures relating to pediatric applications of the device.
-
ItemImplantation of the Melbourne/Cochlear multiple-electrode extracochlear prosthesisFranz, Burkhard K.-H. G. ; Kuzma, Janusz A. ; Lehnhardt, Ernst ; Clark, Graeme M. ; Patrick, James F. ; Laszig, Roland (Annals Publishing Co., 1989)The Melbourne/Cochlear multiple-electrode extracochlear implant is designed for deaf patients who are unsuited to multiple-electrode intracochlear implantation. The implant consists of a receiver-stimulator package connected via a lead wire assembly to six individual stimulating electrodes. There is a choice of two alternative surgical procedures, both of which are via a combined middle ear approach using anterior and posterior tympanotomies. Four active electrodes shaped into compressible platinum-iridium soft-balls are fed through the mastoid cavity and across the facial recess, and placed into cavities that are made over the cochlear turns that project to the medial wall of the middle ear. One hard-ball active electrode is placed into the round window niche. One hard-ball reference electrode is placed into the hypotympanum. An additional electrode wrapped around the lead wire assembly can be used as an alternative reference electrode. A specially designed insertion needle facilitates the placement and the fixation of the soft-ball electrodes.