Graeme Clark Collection
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemPneumococcal meningitis post-cochlear implantation: preventative measures.(Wiley, 2010-11)OBJECTIVE: Both clinical data and laboratory studies demonstrated the risk of pneumococcal meningitis post-cochlear implantation. This review examines strategies to prevent post-implant meningitis. DATA SOURCES: Medline/PubMed database; English articles after 1980. Search terms: cochlear implants, pneumococcus meningitis, streptococcus pneumonia, immunization, prevention. REVIEW METHODS: Narrative review. All articles relating to post-implant meningitis without any restriction in study designs were assessed and information extracted. RESULTS: The presence of inner ear trauma as a result of surgical technique or cochlear implant electrode array design was associated with a higher risk of post-implant meningitis. Laboratory data demonstrated the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination in preventing meningitis induced via the hematogenous route of infection. Fibrous sealing around the electrode array at the cochleostomy site, and the use of antibiotic-coated electrode array reduced the risk of meningitis induced via an otogenic route. CONCLUSION: The recent scientific data support the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendation of pneumococcal vaccination for the prevention of meningitis in implant recipients. Nontraumatic cochlear implant design, surgical technique, and an adequate fibrous seal around the cochleostomy site further reduce the risk of meningitis.
-
ItemPneumococcal meningitis post-cochlear implantation: potential routes of infection and pathophysiology.(Wiley, 2010-11)OBJECTIVE: This review describes the current concept of pneumococcal meningitis in cochlear implant recipients based on recent laboratory studies. It examines possible routes of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection to the meninges in cochlear implant recipients. It also provides insights into fundamental questions concerning the pathophysiology of pneumococcal meningitis in implant recipients. DATA SOURCES: Medline/PubMed database; English articles after 1960. Search terms: cochlear implants, meningitis, pneumococcus, streptococcus pneumonia. REVIEW METHODS: Narrative review. All articles relating to post-implant meningitis without any restriction in study designs were assessed and information extracted. RESULTS: The incidence of pneumococcal meningitis in cochlear implant recipients is greater than that of an age-matched cohort in the general population. Based on the current clinical literature, it is difficult to determine whether cochlear implantation per se increases the risk of meningitis in subjects with no existing risk factors for acquiring the disease. As this question cannot be answered in humans, the study of implant-related infection must involve the use of laboratory animals in order for the research findings to be applicable to a clinical situation. The laboratory research demonstrated the routes of infection and the effects of the cochlear implant in lowering the threshold for pneumococcal meningitis. CONCLUSION: The laboratory data complement the existing clinical data on the risk of pneumococcal meningitis post-cochlear implantation.
-
ItemPneumococcal meningitis threshold model: a potential tool to assess infectious risk of new or existing inner ear surgical interventions( 2006)Hypothesis: A minimal threshold of Streptococcus pneumoniae is required to induce meningitis in healthy animals for intraperitoneal (hematogenous), middle ear, and inner ear inoculations, and this threshold may be altered via recent inner ear surgery. Background: There has been an increase in the number of reported cases of cochlear implant-related pneumococcal meningitis since 2002. The pathogenesis of pneumococcal meningitis is complex and not completely understood. The bacteria can reach the central nervous system (CNS) from the upper respiratory tract mucosa via either hematogenous route or via the inner ear. The establishment of a threshold model for all potential routes of infection to the CNS in animals without cochlear implantation is an important first step to help us understand the pathogenesis of the disease in animals with cochlear implantation. Methods: Fifty-four otologically normal adult Hooded Wistar rats (27 receiving cochleostomy and 27 controls) were inoculated with different amounts of bacterial counts via three different routes (intraperitoneal, middle ear, and inner ear). Rats were monitored during 5 days for signs of meningitis. Blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and middle ear swabs were taken for bacterial culture, and brains and cochleae were examined for signs of infection. Results: The threshold of bacterial counts required to induce meningitis is lowest in rats receiving direct inner ear inoculation compared with both intraperitoneal and middle ear inoculation. There is no change in threshold between the group of rats with cochleostomy and the control (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05). Conclusion: A minimal threshold of bacteria is required to induce meningitis in healthy animals and is different for three different routes of infection (intraperitoneal, middle ear, and inner ear). Cochleostomy performed 4 weeks before the inoculation did not reduce the threshold of bacteria required for meningitis in all three infectious routes. This threshold model will also serve as a valuable tool, assisting clinicians to quantitatively analyze if the presence of a cochlear implantor other CNS prostheses alter the risk of meningitis.